Originally Posted by Mathman
LOL!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
Originally Posted by Mathman
LOL!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
I totally agree with this...to win on your own without 'help' the guys need quads...but i do just absolutley love the 'only' triple jumpers with beautiful choreography...and for the sake of MY enjoyment, wouldn't mind if the were quadless but exquisite (at least once a season).Originally Posted by Doggygirl
OT: DG, i'm a dog lover too!
Originally Posted by skatingfan5
haha! wierd name to call your own dog. "My son". wonder why i never caught on cause one can't envision johnny having a son right now...or anytime for that matter. well, i guess it's technically feasible, LOL.![]()
Nicely put, Emma -Originally Posted by emma
It is always nice to see beautiful skating from a lady or a gentleman, but there was always the dispute between the difficulty of the technical versus the elegant grace of figure skating.
The Technical lovers have won with the CoP. The bigger the tricks the more points and subliminely, it affects the PCS scores. So be it for now, but someday they will get around to Mathman's suggestion of having two sets of judges - one for the tech and one for the performance. It makes sense.
Joe
And not less weird to address the coach "Krasavitza" ("Beauty").Originally Posted by gracefulswan
![]()
Me too.Originally Posted by emma
Though it seems to me it's the 3A that causes most falls. I don't have enough statictics at hand but it looks like that those few guys who have quads are rather consistent with them (except for the latest Worlds but it's a different story LOL).
But overall, I would definitely prefer a quadless but a clean and beautifully choreographed program.
I've heard lots of pet people call their pets "kids" or "son" or names like that.Originally Posted by gracefulswan
Count me in that group!! My dogs ARE my kids.Originally Posted by sk8er1964
![]()
DG
Another point about the quad. Now that the ISU has clarified the point that a quad counts as a different jump from the corresponding triple, if you can do a quad then you can do extra triples later in the program without a Zayak violation.
For instance, if I am reading the rules correctly, you can do a quad toe - triple toe combo [/i]and[/i] a solo triple toe, whereas if you only do a triple toe - triple toe then you can't do another triple toe.
Mathman
That has always been the case. Jumps that can't be repeated (that is, can only be performed twice, one of them being in combination) are the jumps of the same type, with the same amount of revolutions. This only applies to triples or quads, there's no limit for doubles.
Agreed ... and I think he might have to branch out from the unitards at some point.Originally Posted by mmscfdcsu
![]()
I actually really liked his 2004 short program costume, though I liked last year's too.
http://p203.ezboard.com/fjohnnyweirm...icID=589.topic
New pictures at this link. Should stay up for a few days at least.
How in the world did I miss THIS the first time around in this thread???? Maybe it's time to start a Doggy Lover thred in the Cafe so we can all update each other with new dog pics, or even re-hash some old dog pics (for those of us who never tire of looking at dog pics!)Originally Posted by emma
DG
Bookmarks