kyla2 said:I completely disagree that B & S were robotic in their skating. We will have to disagree there. I think they were superior than S & P despite their mistakes. But I won't fight that battle again. It's over. But calling her "skate in the head" is outrageous, cruel etc. I am glad to see that you were quoting a comment in a book, even though it was better left in a book (the writer should be very proud of that; a real Shakespeare). I would hate to think you came up with such a mean spirited comment. Her abusive partnership was with a previous partner, not Anton who essentially rescued her from it.
You needn't be so reasonable!Mathman said:Icenine, thanks for the nice story.
Erica Lee said:Let me get one fact straight here at least - the Silver medals were NOT changed into Gold ones. They did show a 'making of the new gold' fluff piece, but it was from scratch, not a conversion.
As for who should have won, who deserved to win, who was better, who was cheating, heck, whether or not the spectator in row F was picking their nose... we have all long ago made up our minds. I don't know why we insist of rehashing it all, when people who don't agree with us aren't even open to the possibilities. (And I'm talking about both sides of the argument here)
julietvalcouer said:Yes, I'm American. And I'm tired of the Russian robotic style in pairs. *You* may find it artistic, I find it utterly disconnected from the audience, which defeats the purpose of an artistic presentation. If this were just a tricks competition, fine. But giving them higher presentation marks? Absurd. B/S are not as bad as T/M, but they're not much better, either. I also didn't make up "Skate-in-the-Head" (check out the book "The Second Mark.") I'm not going to give her a pass on what I consider uninspired skating because she got kicked in the head by her ex-partner (or because she was apparently in an abusive relationship with said ex-partner.) That's unfortunate, Totmianina getting tossed down the ice is unfortunate, but feeling sorry for them doesn't mean proclaiming them magnificent artists when they're not, no matter how much sports reporters like a good underdog story. They strike me as wooden. YMMV. As far as I'm concerned, they weren't particularly great--no spark, no interest, no real artistry beyond precision. I don't watch either of those pairs and buy that they are emotionally involved in the least.
And again--the judges cheated. There is no quesiton about that. S/P *were* judged unfairly because it was already set that they would not win. They had a great deal to complain about, as do, frankly, a lot of ice dancers over the years (for the record I'm not including Torvill/Dean '94 in that--where I was sitting, Usova/Zhulin were the ones who should have won but that was a rare case where it really could have gone any which way.)
And the beat goes on. Skating started in the Netherlands; ballet started in Italy; motion pictures started in France.curious said:Yes,I know many people here are tired of the Russian's DOMINANCE in a sport they have DOMINATED for CENTURIES lol! To call B&S's one of the most ARTISTIC pairs of all time ROBOTIC is a JOKE
curious said:Yes,I know many people here are tired of the Russian's DOMINANCE in a sport they have DOMINATED for CENTURIES lol! To call B&S's one of the most ARTISTIC pairs of all time ROBOTIC is a JOKE
SkateFan4Life said:This is totally ridiculous, in my view. Duh - Sale and Pelletier originally won the silver medal at Salt Lake, then thanks to the huge bruhaha over the judging, they were awarded the gold medal. They even had a dual medal ceremony with B & S with both national anthems.
Why on earth would they want the silver? Do they honestly think they deserve two medals? Give me a break. Frankly, I've never been a fan of this team, and I think they were overrated for years in terms of artistry, but I'm not a judge, so my opinion doesn't carry any weight in these matters.
Maybe people were just misinformed. After all, the title of the thread is, "Sale wants the SLC silver medal back."Tonichelle said:the only people who said they wanted both medals.. were people responding to this article on message boards...
Jamie said she felt more connected to her silver medal because it was hers. She earned it. the other one was given to her because of a scandal. She didn't necceserily earn it. She "inherited" it.
Don't go re-writing her words just because you don't like the outcome of a 4 year old competition.
That is a good idea, Rgirl. Human nature being what it is, there will always be more people who want to comment on an article than there are people who are willing actually to read it.Rgirl said:Maybe people were just misinformed. After all, the title of the thread is, "Sale wants the SLC silver medal back."
If the information is wrong, can't the mods work with the person who started the thread to change the title, preferably early on before "forum rumors" get started?
Tonichelle said:the only people who said they wanted both medals.. were people responding to this article on message boards...
Jamie said she felt more connected to her silver medal because it was hers. She earned it. the other one was given to her because of a scandal. She didn't necceserily earn it. She "inherited" it.
Don't go re-writing her words just because you don't like the outcome of a 4 year old competition.