Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Detailed PCS Scores?

  1. #1
    Tripping on the Podium
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Dover, NH
    Posts
    63

    Detailed PCS Scores?

    Does anybody know where to find the detailed results with the PCS scores? I easily found the list of the total scores, but I want to see the PCS scores in detail.

  2. #2
    Custom User Title CDMM1991's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    1,220
    www.nbcolympics.com

    Click Results/Schedules in the top left hand corner.

  3. #3
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Uppsala, Sweden
    Posts
    207
    looking at the detailed score..I/B got 6.3 for their throw 3axel..didn't she fall quite bad on that one?

  4. #4
    Sexy, smart and sterilized! childfreegirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    722
    Quote Originally Posted by Engwaciriel
    looking at the detailed score..I/B got 6.3 for their throw 3axel..didn't she fall quite bad on that one?
    Not in the short. She fell on the one in the long.

  5. #5
    Custom Title antmanb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    UK - Manchester
    Posts
    4,913

    Fall on Th3A

    No no they got 6.30 for the fall on the throw 3A...

    It is a little bit suspicious that it was marked so highly...a throw triple axel has a base value of 7.5. Very curious because the reduction of base value for

    -1 GOE = 0.7
    -2 GOE = 1.4
    -3 GOE = 2

    So what exactly was the reduction taken? A fall is fall no? Should it have received the full -2 reduction shoul dhave been taken to give it a mark of 5.5.

    The only explanation i can try to give is that i think i remember reading somwhere that you mark each phase of the jump and then look at any - GOE characteristics but that a flawed element can never be scored higher than base value.

    So maybe some judges thought the entrance was difficult (but i think it was a straight cross overs set up), that the jump was particularly high or long which would have made them mark it +2 but with the fall (-3) it all came out at -1??

    I'm stabbing in the dark here but without the actual detail up ni the protocol its tough to see and looks quite fishy to me.

    Ant

  6. #6
    Sexy, smart and sterilized! childfreegirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    722
    Whoops. I was looking at the mark for the pair combo spin. Sorry!

  7. #7
    Sexy, smart and sterilized! childfreegirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    722
    But it was after the halfway point, so they would've gotten a 10% bonus. I'm not the greatest with numbers, so I don't know if that was factored in or not. It's way too early and I haven't had any coffee yet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •