Are the old-school Russian pairs all gone now? | Golden Skate

Are the old-school Russian pairs all gone now?

Spirit

On the Ice
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
I don't know Petrova & Tikhonov's history or where they were trained, but watching them skate, I couldn't help but think, They just look Russian. I don't know enough about skating to put it into words, but they just seemed to have a certain style that looked like old-school Russian, to me.

Now they have retired, and T&M have retired. Oleg Vasiliev and Tamara Moskvina are still coaching, but they don't have the resources and environment like they used to.

Will we see a pair with an old-school style of Russian skating again? I'm not talking about whether we'll see Russian pair skaters again, I'm wondering about an old-fashioned style and perfection. It seems like a huge statement to say that an era has come to a close, but is that the case?
 

Ptichka

Forum translator
Record Breaker
Joined
Jul 28, 2003
Spirit, I think that unfortunately the era is indeed over. The system was based too much on kids who really had no other chance to get ahead other than through sport. They lived in a very cacooned world. It was good for the sport, but perhaps not so good for the society.
 

JonnyCoop

Record Breaker
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
I won't even pretend to be nearly as knowledgable about Russian culture as Ptichka is, but to my mind, we could see that style again in the future. I did notice a rather "retro Russian" look to Totmiannina & Maranin's Oly LP, and as they are coached by Oleg Vasiliev, seems to me he might bring this style to the skating of a pair he might coach in the future.
 

hockeyfan228

Record Breaker
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Borzenkova/Chuvulaev have more than a bit of Russian style, and I hope they get the third spot next year, but I suspect Sheshtakova/Lebedev will after working with Vassiliev.
 
Joined
Jul 11, 2003
As long as there are Russian teaches and coaches in any part of the world, there will be the Russian style of Pairs.

What I think is missing in Russia is the easy life these skaters had under the USSR. That, I think this has had the difficulty in finding new talent.

I watched Arina Martinova in Calgary. She has much talent, but I don't know if any great coach is interested in guiding her along the way. I'm sure the great Russian coaches charge quite a bit now (and why not?).

Joe
 
Last edited:

rjulie510

Rinkside
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
For me personally Berezhnaya/Sikharulidze was the last great Russian pair. Petrova/Tikonov was a good pair but I wouldn't put them on the list next to all the other great ones. For awhile I thought Yulia Obertas had a potential to join this list if she finds the righ partner, but Obertas/Slanov isn't going anywhere.
 

hockeyfan228

Record Breaker
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Joesitz said:
I watched Arina Martinova in Calgary. She has much talent, but I don't know if any great coach is interested in guiding her along the way. I'm sure the great Russian coaches charge quite a bit now (and why not?).
Russian coaches have subsidized the skating of their students, either with free ice time or through "paying" skaters or by having a wealthy husband, like Gedevanishvili's coach, Elena (Vodorezova) Buianova (who was the first or one of the first Russian women to win a European and Worlds medal, and said in an interview that she was lucky her husband was a successful businessman and she could continue to coach and make "hobby" wages.)
 

Vash01

Medalist
Joined
Jul 31, 2003
Petrova-Tikhnov' style belongs in the old school Russian pairs. I don't see any logical reason why Moskvina et al. could not coach more talented pairs in the years to come. However, I see that pairs skating/judging has changed to suit the chinese style. Gone are the finesse moves- unison, edges, positions and lines, 'two shall skate as one'. Pairs skating is a 'circus on ice' now. The chinese win medals by throwing their partners high up in the air or far across the ice. Those moves are impressive but to me it is not true pairs skating unless they are combined with the other skills. I see that the judges reward the circus more than the skating. Zhang & Zhang and Pang-Tong both beat a clean performance by Petrova-Tikhonov, when both chinese pairs had one fall each. Any Russian pair that sticks with the classical style is not likely to win a competition at this point. I think that is the reason the old school Russian pairs skating my disappear.

T&M won the Olympics by skating clean and by doing difficult sbs jumps which was their strength. In pairs moves they don't compare with the great pairs of the past- B&S, G&G, M&D. I like them a lot but i don't see them as classical Russian pairs skaters. The era of Russian dominance is certainly over but I will not be surprised if new pairs emerged in a few years from a very proud culture.

I don't see Mukhartova & Trankov going anywhere even though they won the junior worlds last year. Their body lines are very different, and they may do better with different partners (JMO). They have already switched partners to form this pair, so I don't know if they will do that again. Borzenkova-Chuvilaev have difficulty with sbs jumps (he in particular is very tall, although he does not use his height as an excuse for missing jumps), so they may not do well.

Vash
 

anything_for_skating

Final Flight
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
HEY, what's wrong with all of you?!?!?!
In four years time, Moskvina will turn Obertas/Slavnon into real champions!:
:rock:
 
Last edited:

antmanb

Record Breaker
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
rjulie510 said:
For me personally Berezhnaya/Sikharulidze was the last great Russian pair. Petrova/Tikonov was a good pair but I wouldn't put them on the list next to all the other great ones. For awhile I thought Yulia Obertas had a potential to join this list if she finds the righ partner, but Obertas/Slanov isn't going anywhere.

And actually after watching worlds i no longer think its him that's the problem. This pair has always been touted as the pair where she is so strong and beautiful and a natural pairs skater. As far as i can see she has sat around stagnating while he's worked his b******s off to become a better pairs skater - his jumps have improved, his footwork in the lifts has certainly improved (he's not the best but he was pretty scary a couple of seasons ago so the improvement is great), his presentation has become more polished and i don't think she's done very much to improve at all. I think her jumps have gotten weaker - partly exacerbated by the fact she clearly can't land a double axel to save her life and has been forced to put it in the program this year because of the rule change for pairs SBS jumps. I think Julia needs to start improving fast to keep up with Slavnov.

Ant
 

hockeyfan228

Record Breaker
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
antmanb said:
And actually after watching worlds i no longer think its him that's the problem. This pair has always been touted as the pair where she is so strong and beautiful and a natural pairs skater. As far as i can see she has sat around stagnating while he's worked his b******s off to become a better pairs skater - his jumps have improved, his footwork in the lifts has certainly improved (he's not the best but he was pretty scary a couple of seasons ago so the improvement is great), his presentation has become more polished and i don't think she's done very much to improve at all. I think her jumps have gotten weaker - partly exacerbated by the fact she clearly can't land a double axel to save her life and has been forced to put it in the program this year because of the rule change for pairs SBS jumps. I think Julia needs to start improving fast to keep up with Slavnov.
Ant
I quoted your whole post because ITA with everything you said. He has worked very hard, especially on his posture and trying to match her line, and has matured into quite a nice partner. (I think much better than Trankov or Lebedev.) Obertas is lucky to have him.

Given the number of points awarded to a 3A (3.5) vs. a 2T (1.3), and given the deductions she has on the Axel, I think they'd be better off trying another (toe) double for their second jump. I know there's a macho factor involved that transcends the point values -- i.e. if you want to be at the top of the podium, you can't do junior elements -- but they gain so much else on other levels, being one of the few teams to do the Throw 3Flip (and if they'd put back their 4Tw, they'd get back macho points).
 

attyfan

Custom Title
Medalist
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Ptichka said:
Spirit, I think that unfortunately the era is indeed over. The system was based too much on kids who really had no other chance to get ahead other than through sport. They lived in a very cacooned world. It was good for the sport, but perhaps not so good for the society.

From the fluffs, it seems that the Chinese pairs skaters seem to live in a cocooned world, also, totally isolated from the rest of the world -- and the government picking up the expenses. Could the next team with that "old school Russian style" be Chinese?
 

antmanb

Record Breaker
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
hockeyfan228 said:
I quoted your whole post because ITA with everything you said. He has worked very hard, especially on his posture and trying to match her line, and has matured into quite a nice partner. (I think much better than Trankov or Lebedev.) Obertas is lucky to have him.

Given the number of points awarded to a 3A (3.5) vs. a 2T (1.3), and given the deductions she has on the Axel, I think they'd be better off trying another (toe) double for their second jump. I know there's a macho factor involved that transcends the point values -- i.e. if you want to be at the top of the podium, you can't do junior elements -- but they gain so much else on other levels, being one of the few teams to do the Throw 3Flip (and if they'd put back their 4Tw, they'd get back macho points).

I agree or even a good 2/2 like 2Lz/2lp and do it in combination instead of sequence and it would be good.

Ant
 

Vash01

Medalist
Joined
Jul 31, 2003
antmanb said:
And actually after watching worlds i no longer think its him that's the problem. This pair has always been touted as the pair where she is so strong and beautiful and a natural pairs skater. As far as i can see she has sat around stagnating while he's worked his b******s off to become a better pairs skater - his jumps have improved, his footwork in the lifts has certainly improved (he's not the best but he was pretty scary a couple of seasons ago so the improvement is great), his presentation has become more polished and i don't think she's done very much to improve at all. I think her jumps have gotten weaker - partly exacerbated by the fact she clearly can't land a double axel to save her life and has been forced to put it in the program this year because of the rule change for pairs SBS jumps. I think Julia needs to start improving fast to keep up with Slavnov.

Ant

I had exactly the same impression at these worlds. Up to this point I was thinking that Julia was the talented one and Sergei had to catch up. I was fairly impressed with Sergei at worlds; he has improved his posture and his overall presentation. He seems to almost always land the jumps. He may never become Sikharulidze or Dmitriev but he can be a very solid partner. Julia on the other hand did not impress me at all. She no longer appears like that incredibly talented skater. I wonder if Tamara could bring in a jumps coach for her? Her mistakes are killing any chances this pair may have of making it to the podium. I also heard that Julia is tough to get along with. That's a bad combination. Unless she starts fixing her technical problems this pair is not going anywhere. Afterall, Tamara can only do so much.

Another question is- why are they not going for the quad twist?

Vash
 

76olympics

On the Ice
Joined
Mar 4, 2004
G and G actually did a quad twist-but few noticed it! Katia said it was too much energy for too little reward in the marks--so they dropped it. Their triple twist was so huge that I wasn't surprised at all.
 

Vash01

Medalist
Joined
Jul 31, 2003
76olympics said:
G and G actually did a quad twist-but few noticed it! Katia said it was too much energy for too little reward in the marks--so they dropped it. Their triple twist was so huge that I wasn't surprised at all.

Yes, I had read about it. Another pair had done it before them, so there have been at least one before them and two after them (Z&Z and O&S). Under the COP it definitely would collect more points if completed. So O&S would benefit from it, although it seems from another post that Sergei had hurt his hand so they are not doing it.

Vash
 

anything_for_skating

Final Flight
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
rjulie510 said:
For me personally Berezhnaya/Sikharulidze was the last great Russian pair. Petrova/Tikonov was a good pair but I wouldn't put them on the list next to all the other great ones. For awhile I thought Yulia Obertas had a potential to join this list if she finds the righ partner, but Obertas/Slanov isn't going anywhere.


Bereznaya and Sikharulidze are the greatest pair ever!!!

But hey, Petrova and Tkhonov are one of the greatest also!!!


And in four years time, Moskvina will turn Obertas/Slavnov into real champions!
 
Top