Unsuccessful material | Page 2 | Golden Skate

Unsuccessful material

JonnyCoop

Record Breaker
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Because of its unusual musical structure, I feel "Bolero" is impossible to properly skate to anyway, I DON'T CARE WHO IS DOING IT. With the exception of Torvill & Dean, who somehow by some miracle and the genius of Christopher Dean, DID manage to pull it off, every single program I have seen of this music (Abt, Plushenko [it's an especially bad idea for a short program], Michelle, Chait/Sakhnovsky) has just fallen absolutely completely flat.
 

Lanie

On the Ice
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
It probably doesn't help that Michelle's Bolero had potential but removed all the Dean choreogaphy, probably even prior to Campbells.
 

##Lara##

Spectator
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
hey everyone...my first time here..

Kwan - Bolere, Belbin/Agosto..I love them but.. thats entertainmente was terrible, Evan - Grease
 

silver.blades

Medalist
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Country
Canada
Because of its unusual musical structure, I feel "Bolero" is impossible to properly skate to anyway, I DON'T CARE WHO IS DOING IT. With the exception of Torvill & Dean, who somehow by some miracle and the genius of Christopher Dean, DID manage to pull it off, every single program I have seen of this music

I agree. I've never figured out how T&D managed to create a great program to that. Some music is just unskatable.

Add Joubert's Riverdance program to the list of bad programs. It was just plain awful.
 
Joined
Jul 11, 2003
It's difficult for a card carrying Michelle Fan, and I am one, to admit that Bolero was devoid a of her normal technical, such as the loop jump, and camel spins, BUT it was. Other than her trade mark change edge spiral and finger movements, I am sure it was not Christopher Dean's concept of a solo Bolero.

Despite the medal awards, her Sheherezade and Tosca were not any better. She was at this point from 2006 to be extremely cautious of what she tweaked. There was no faults of the choreographers, imo.

(She kept the image going though, and made beaucoup d'argent on her love for competition in cheesefests.)

Joe
 

Tinymavy15

Sinnerman for the win
Record Breaker
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Because of its unusual musical structure, I feel "Bolero" is impossible to properly skate to anyway, I DON'T CARE WHO IS DOING IT. With the exception of Torvill & Dean, who somehow by some miracle and the genius of Christopher Dean, DID manage to pull it off, every single program I have seen of this music (Abt, Plushenko [it's an especially bad idea for a short program], Michelle, Chait/Sakhnovsky) has just fallen absolutely completely flat.

:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::clap:

i am not saying Bolero os bad music. It is masterpeice. but like Chopin's prelude ( which i simply adore) it is nearly impossible to pull off a skating program.
 

JonnyCoop

Record Breaker
Joined
Dec 28, 2003
Despite the medal awards, her Sheherezade and Tosca were not any better. She was at this point from 2006 to be extremely cautious of what she tweaked. There was no faults of the choreographers, imo.

Joe

I thought the Michelle/Scheherezade combination was going to be absolutely incredible, and ITA that it fell flat, but I do actually blame the choreographer. I think if Lori Nichol had choreographed this one, it WOULD have been great, but I saw nothing, choreography-wise, in that program that was even remotely memorable, and I don't feel it had much to do with Michelle being cautious (which with her tended to show up more in the jumps anyway.).
 

GoldMedalist

Match Penalty
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
I liked her Scheherezade. It was perhaps disappointing because it wasn't a "6.0" program, but all of the elements went well with the music and the program did build to a satisfying conclusion.
 

Tinymavy15

Sinnerman for the win
Record Breaker
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
I thought the Michelle/Scheherezade combination was going to be absolutely incredible, and ITA that it fell flat, but I do actually blame the choreographer. I think if Lori Nichol had choreographed this one, it WOULD have been great, but I saw nothing, choreography-wise, in that program that was even remotely memorable, and I don't feel it had much to do with Michelle being cautious (which with her tended to show up more in the jumps anyway.).

I think that Michelle could have made Scherherzade her signiture program.... but it just didin't seem to be her year. she left Frank and i guess really was just focusing on lnading clean jumps... she was even practicing a triple lutz, triple loop so i guess the chreography just got sidlined. too bad. so much potienal.
 

Mafke

Medalist
Joined
Mar 22, 2004
Part of what made Kwan so special is that she kept re-inventing herself, in broad terms her eligible career can be divided into three periods.

1. little jumping bean
2. exquisite young artist
3. mature power skater

Salome was the bridge between the first two periods and Scherezade was the bridge between the last two. It comes between the ultimate lyricism of Dream of the black swan 98-2001 and the tougher more athletic style she developed 2003-05.

Pre-Scherezade : She was slower (not slow per se, but not as fast as she got later) and had lots of inbetweens and lots of subdued difficulty. The jumps weren't especially high but they got the job done.

Scherezade: I think she was getting sick of doing "Michelle Kwan" programs and wanted to shake things up. The single most significant part of Scherezade was the 'beheading' at the end. She was determined to confound people's preconceptions about what she could and couldn't do. I think the choreography was completely up to what the program was designed to do (which was not be a Lori Nichols program).

Post-Scherezade: She gained speed and attitude at the expense of inbetweens and choreographic intricacy. After working with Artunian she also gained a lot more height on her jumps. Sadly, injury (partly brought about by the loathesome spin requirements of COP?) ended her career before she could morph again...

Bolero is another story entirely, as the injuries were starting to kick in and she never was able to lay down a definitive performance of the program. If her body had help up a little better it might be remembered a lot differently.
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Scherezade: I think she was getting sick of doing "Michelle Kwan" programs and wanted to shake things up. The single most significant part of Scherezade was the 'beheading' at the end. She was determined to confound people's preconceptions about what she could and couldn't do. I think the choreography was completely up to what the program was designed to do (which was not be a Lori Nichols program).
Very interesting perspective.

Michelle did say at the time that the entertainer that she admired most was Madonna. For the reason that Madonna was continually reinventing herself -- just when you thought you had her all figured out, she raised the bar and took off in a new direction.

The only justification Michelle ever offered for parting with Lori Nichol and Frank Carroll was that she "wanted to take control of her own skating." Scheherezade could have been a blockbuster if Michelle had just been able to deliver the technical content that she planned.

At Skate Canada, for instance (her first competition without Frank), she intended something like 3T+3T, 3Lz+3Lo, 2A, 3F, 3S, 3Lz, and two more jumps (she was doing 8 jumping passes then), probably including solo 3Lo. She did do a solo 3Lo in each of her other performances, Skate America, the Grand Prix Final, and the Olympics. (I'm not sure what the Zayak rules allowed back then.)

At the time I was disappointed in the choice of music. Left to her own preferences, rather than Nichol's, she went with the standard late-romantic Russian war horse concept (Tchaikovsky, Rimsky-Korsakov, Rachmaninov). A stark contrast -- "taking control" -- with the out-of-the-way gems that Nichol had found for her (Lyra Angelica, Red Violin, Song of the Black Swan)

Looked at as the bridge to the "new Michelle" of Aranjuez and Tosca, however, this all makes sense.

(BTW, Michelle was ahead of her time. With just a little tweaking that jump layout would be at a maximum under CoP. Somehting like 3F+3T, 3Lz+3Lo, 2A, 3F*, 3S*, 3Lz*, 2A+2Lo+2Lo* = 48.75 base points on jump elements. Only a triple Axel could give her more.)
 
Last edited:

GoldMedalist

Match Penalty
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
At Skate Canada, for instance (her first competition without Frank), she intended something like 3T+3T, 3Lz+3Lo

AFAIK she was planning 3T+3Lo and 3Lz+3Lo.

I hope she never tries doing 3Loops in combination ever again. Her 3Lo off the 3Lz was horribly underrotated and then of course she fell. It's more important that she get a 3F+3T or 3Lz+3T consistent if she comes back. Those are within her abilities.
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
I wouldn't want her to give up on a jump just because she tried it once and missed.

But I do want her to give it up because it's bad for her hip.

Anyway, Public Policy Envoys, college students, corporate spokespeople, and future TV commentators don't need to do triple loops. :cool:
 

Mafke

Medalist
Joined
Mar 22, 2004
There's also the Scherezade curse for ladies.

I can think of three reigning world champions who lost their titles while skating lp's to Scherezade.

Fratianne (78, lost to Poetzsch)
Ito (90, lost to Trenary)
Kwan (02, lost to Slutskaya)

Has any ladies reigning world champion skated to Scherezade and _not_ lost the title?

(I think Carmen might be sort of cursed for ladies too, Fratianne and Thomas lost at the olympics with it and Witt held on by the skin of her teeth with her weakest long program since ...1981?)
 

GoldMedalist

Match Penalty
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
(I think Carmen might be sort of cursed for ladies too, Fratianne and Thomas lost at the olympics with it and Witt held on by the skin of her teeth with her weakest long program since ...1981?)

Witt's 1988 Olympic performance was better than her 1984 Olympic performance.

Or do you mean at Worlds, where she doubled one of her Salchows (in addition to doubling the Loop)?

1988 Worlds really sucked. Witt, Manley, and Ito all dropped down from how well they did at the Olympics and Thomas remained just as Blah.
 

Mafke

Medalist
Joined
Mar 22, 2004
Witt's 1988 Olympic performance was better than her 1984 Olympic performance.
Or do you mean at Worlds, where she doubled one of her Salchows (in addition to doubling the Loop)?

In absolute terms, maybe Witt in Calgary was better (more mature) than in Sarajevo, but in relative terms she was worse (in that she lost the lp for the first time in many years). I agree that ladies at 88 worlds was kind of blah (though Witt won the lp there with an even weaker performance than in Calgary because none of the other ladies were able to step up to the plate).
 

rtureck

Final Flight
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Part of what made Kwan so special is that she kept re-inventing herself, in broad terms her eligible career can be divided into three periods.

1. little jumping bean
2. exquisite young artist
3. mature power skater

Nice analysis. I think MK's reinventing herself is secondary in part to how the judges were treating her. She started as a little jumping bean, just skated for the sheer joy of it. In 95, she landed 7 triples + 2 double axels, received the only standing O, and the judges left her off the podiuim. When she had the jumps the judges wanted art.

Her 97 programs, both sp and lp were probably the most packed with inbetweens among all Kwan programs. Unfortunately, she sacrificed the jump accuracy for that. So she had to invent herself for the artistry/ presentation for the olympic year 98. By 98, she had the art, the judges wanted jumps. So she had to invent herself with jumps, sacrifice the inbetweens, and added nuiances of a head roll here and a flick of the wrist there. (Song of Black Swan showed her off nicely in those areas). Then she had to invent herself again, because the judges loved Irina's power. (WAs it GPF 00 or 01? MK landed more triple jumps and presented her programs in a more sophisticated way, but the judges rewarded Irina for her power?). Then MK invent herself with power.

I am most definitely not saying that MK WUZ robbed. (maybe in 95). But that is the world of sport, and a skater does not stay on top for 10 years without having the discipline to reinvent herself.

Bolero is impossible to skate to. I wish she had stayed with Lori. Lori is good at finding obscure classical pieces (at least for MK). Skating to obscure pieces is not risk free, but IMO carries less risk and potentially may gain more reward than skating to overused top 100 classical. Bolero is a piece that is impossible to skate to.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 11, 2003
Part of what made Kwan so special is that she kept re-inventing herself, in broad terms her eligible career can be divided into three periods.

1. little jumping bean
2. exquisite young artist
3. mature power skater

I can't argue with your grouping. I do believe artists get better as they age if they stay with their art.

However, imo, Kwan had a problem in the era just before Nagano. We were told it was a bruised toe but I believe now, that it was the beginning of the hip problem. She took the chance of leaving out her 3Tx3T but Tara with her 3Rx3R took over. She then left out her 3x3 combo in all future competitions, I believe (to save the hip from getting worse)., and then she disappeared from the GP series. Later, of course, elements began to disappear at Worlds.

Kwan's maturity was super and imo, the best ever of a female skater but as a competitor she faltered badly and without Tara and Irina, got through the 2003 Worlds with a brilliant performance but not much in the Technical. The CoP was going to get her!!!

Joe
 
Last edited:

GoldMedalist

Match Penalty
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Kwan's maturity was super and imo, the best ever of a female skater but as a competitor she faltered badly and without Tara and Irina, got through the 2003 Worlds with a brilliant performance but not much in the Technical.

6 Triples, a gorgeous Spiral, and a gorgeous Footwork sequence is "not much in the Technical"???
 
Top