- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
Joesitz said:Perhaps Skategirl45's suggestion of replacing the SP with a separate Technical Competition, could also be considered. I think allowing the skater to select 5 jumps with ISU factors would reveal more of the skater's technical prowess, and when properly judged as to technique, the results would show the greater the sportsperson. (Spins and footwork should be included also.)
The present system of the SP is for me, quite wishy washy.
I like Skatergirl's idea, too, especially the part about the PCS-only part of the triad.
But I do like short programs. Wishy-washy or not, what is cool to me is that the choreographer has to work within a tightly restricted structure, yet is still expected to produce something af artistic substance. I look at it like a sonnet, as opposed to free verse. You have exactly so many lines of closely prescibed meter to work with. But many skaters are able to do at least a little bit of something with it, and once in a while you get a real gem!
In fact, truth be known, I like short programs better than long. Four or four-and-a-half minutes tests my attention span.
Not to mention, some choreographers use the short and long programs together as act one and act two, in contrasting moods. :Like what Michelle planned for the 2006 Olympics, but never got to perform. An SP to a fast and fantastical dance of the dead, followed by an introspective LP contemplating death's solemnity. That is the fun of skating, to me.
I am just afraid that if the ISU held a contest of technical skills only, no one would come except the parents of the competitors.
Last edited: