because it was a repeated spin... I want to say combination spin...
I hope someone posts more detail about this, because I wondered about it, too. The new rule says (rather awkwardly) that each spin must have "different letters" in its description -- in other words, you can't do the the same kind of spin twice.
According to the protocols, Kim did a FSSp4 (flying sitspin), a CoSp4 (combination spin), and her last element was listed as a CCoSp4 (change-foot combination spin). I don't see why these aren't three different spins. Unless maybe she did not do enough revolutions on each foot to get the credit for the extra "C" on the last spin.
The same happened to rachael Flatt. Her spins were FCSp4 (flying camel), CoSp4 and CCoSp4. The last one didn't count.
Maybe someone should skate their SP with an added piece at the end for the their LP one year?
Ant
Without rules, anything would go. And then how would the winner be determined?
You sorta want the rules to make sense though.
There's no need to restrict spins so much for the LP ("freeskate"). The requirement of doing different spin types was enough. Why must we HAVE to do a flying spin?
There's no need to restrict spins so much for the LP ("freeskate"). The requirement of doing different spin types was enough. Why must we HAVE to do a flying spin?