...And how do you feel about any 2 judges liking a skater's program exactly the same? Those two '9s guys', the Russian and the Ukrainian judge, were in perfect sync on all the 5 program fs components of a certain skater: 8.75 and 8.75 for SS, 7.75 and 7.75 for TR, 9.00 and 9.00 on PE, 8.50 and 8.50 on CH, and finally 9.00 and 9.00 for IN.
What do stats say about chances of two great minds thinking alike?
Now I cant what til cup of china becuase in the past two gps the world medalist has not beem on the podium ; and a 2nd tier(Adam;Artem) has snuck in for the bronze if the patter follows Evan will end up 4th nock on wood
My statistical analysis says these two judges are outright crooks. A 9 in interpretation? Interpretation?!
im curious about that too; Even if the ISU knew who the judges were can you fire volunteers; or is there a judging boot camp
The worst Evan can place in this field is second. Seriously. Same goes for Skate America. He has got the easiest fields in the entire GP.
The worst Evan can place in this field is second. Seriously. Same goes for Skate America. He has got the easiest fields in the entire GP.
Lol, I loved how he pointed his #1 finger at the crowd after his 3/3 sequence & then at the end at the judges. What nerve, what guts, what passion, what verve!
A 9 in interpretation? Interpretation?!
i think only few including plush could do this and get away..i also suspect he wouldn do it if grand prix was not in russiaAnd if Patrick Chan did the same, it would be "What a jerk!".
i think only few including plush could do this and get away
i totally enjoyed him, he looked so happy he came back, my only regret, i was so close to the ice, i could have given him a haircut by accident
Frankly, he didn't get away with it imo. He looked like a complete prat...especially when he gyrated.
Oh, there's a lot more to it than what I wrote. But it was so OT, I figured I'd spare the rest of you...It's very tricky. We are trying to apply statistical methods to qualitites rather than to quantities. The question is -- what exactly do we want to measure?
In studies like the ones you describe, yes, we can measure the degree of agreement among the judges. And when we finish our analysis, that is what we have learned. That this panel of judges was in more substantial agreement than was that panel of judges. Or that there was substantial agreement among judges that Kozuka's skating skills were superior to Van der Perren's, but that there was less agreement on the question of whether Weir's transitions were better than Mroz's.
And if Patrick Chan did the same, it would be "What a jerk!".
i totally enjoyed him, he looked so happy he came back, my only regret, i was so close to the ice, i could have given him a haircut by accident
A 9 in interpretation? Interpretation?!
Is he trying to make himself throw up?On second thought, maybe it should have been 10.
http://img.beta.rian.ru/images/19040/63/190406352.jpg