
Originally Posted by
Buttercup
Well, I suppose that was in reference to my post here and elsewhere on the forum. What a strange interpretation of my comments, and posts written by other people. I did not suggest that Evan Lysacek was overmarked as part of some vast conspiracy to make him appear a superior skater to, say, Daisuke Takahashi. And nobody suggested that he isn't the rightful leader after the SP; in fact, I specifically pointed out that I did not watch the SP, and asked others for their opinion.
An event in the US, with the reigning American world champion gainst a mostly subpar field... who doesn't expect a bit of a bonus? And with Florent Amodio being an (inconsistent) up and coming skater, I can't imagine anyone expected sky high PCS for him. But considering the content in Lysacek's performance - quadless, with a cheated 3A - that score seems very generous, especially as Evan doesn't have the best technique and isn't known for amazing choreography and musical interpretation. Apparently it's the highest PCS score of the season; I seriously doubt there was no better performance all season on that mark. Evan Lysacek is not the Yu-Na Kim of men's skating.
Established top skaters are often helped on PCS. It's nothing new, though in this case it does appear somewhat excessive. But there is a huge difference between the judges getting overexcited about a skater, which is not really unusual, compared with actually conspiring to keep the scores of certain skaters down, and I should think that would be obvious to anyone.
Janetfan, I realize you have been a skating fan for many years, that you support American skaters, and that by your own admission, you have something of a cold war mentality about it. But if you seriously think the American skaters are the only ones earning their scores fair and square while everyone else is cheating, which is basically what Carroll said, then I don't think there's any point in having a discussion.
Bookmarks