I wouldn't start counting Alyssa's GPF chances just yet. If she has one of her usual "Alyssa" freeskates she could finish OTP. Then she's out for good.
I wouldn't start counting Alyssa's GPF chances just yet. If she has one of her usual "Alyssa" freeskates she could finish OTP. Then she's out for good.
I have never been a huge fan of Joannie. To me, she looked too athletic, too stiff, and seemed to lack artistry. But When I saw her in China weeks ago, I fell in love with her tango (and her costume) even though she made mistakes and got low score. Who choreograghed her SP? Isn't it perhaps Shae-Lynn? It looks like her style. Whoever choreograghed it, he/she did a terrific job and seems to have made considerable efforts for it to look good on Joannie.
When I first heard of Joannie's music choice months ago, I knew it will sell (and I actually said here that she was very smart in choosing her music!) Who wouldn't like Tango? It is a very smart move to choose popular, emotional, audience-apealing music (e.g. tango, gypsy, flamenco, etc.) especially in Olympic season. Good job, Joannie!
It's so sad that Akiko got so low score. I wish her all the best tomorrow! Of course, best wishes to my Alissa (and Mirai) too!
Last edited by zartian; 11-20-2009 at 03:49 PM.
who cares about the number anyway. Much as people like to compare, scores really aren't that comparible from event to event. Different callers as well as different panels of judges might make different calls or dole out different GOE's. If she got 75 points or 55 points, i would say something is off, but it seems to be in about the correct range for her skating.
At the end of the day, she is several points superior to Alissa and that is what she received. Whether it was 66 vs 70 or 60 vs 64 or 68 vs 72 it does't make all that much difference.
1 Joannie CAN 70.00 38.40 31.60 7.85 7.50 8.05 8.00 8.10 0.00 #11
2 Alissa USA 63.52 36.60 26.92 7.15 6.05 7.05 6.55 6.85 0.00 #7
3 Mirai USA 56.34 32.30 24.04 6.35 5.50 6.25 6.05 5.90 0.00 #3
4 Laura FIN 55.74 29.14 26.60 6.95 6.20 6.65 6.75 6.70 0.00 #10
5 Cynthia CAN 55.58 31.10 24.48 6.45 5.40 6.40 6.05 6.30 0.00 #2
6 Amelie CAN 55.10 32.70 22.40 5.95 5.15 5.85 5.50 5.55 0.00 #1
7 Caroline USA 54.58 31.58 23.00 6.20 5.20 5.85 5.80 5.70 0.00 #9
8 Akiko JPN 53.10 29.90 23.20 6.40 5.00 6.05 5.90 5.65 0.00 #8
9 Jenna GBR 47.48 26.92 20.56 5.55 4.50 5.40 5.20 5.05 0.00 #5
10 Sarah GER 45.50 25.70 19.80 5.30 4.25 5.35 5.00 4.85 0.00 #6
11 Joshi SWE 40.48 22.08 19.40 5.25 4.25 5.10 4.95 4.70 1.00 #4
I'm not a judge, but I can't really really understand between
Joannie's pcs 31.60 and Alissa's 26.92 and Akiko's 23.20
especially Akiko was a champion in COR, joannie 3rd though.
what makes a difference between 31.60 and 23.20 ???
Last edited by Layfan; 11-20-2009 at 03:52 PM. Reason: typo
I know we all don't like to admit home country advantage, but come on! How else can you explain Lacoste and Phaneuf over Suzuki? No, seriously. Can anyone explain this to me for any other reason than because Suzuki isn't Canadian?
And if 6 points is going to be the only difference, then COP needs to start rewarding the 3-3 more.
Wait a minute...Rochette didn't do a 3-3??
and she scored 70???
HUH?!![]()
Well Suzuki had two mistakes in her program (toe axel and a flip out). I would imagine her spins also did not have the highest levels. Audience reaction does have an influence on the marks and I would say the audience reacted more to the two Canadians (naturally).
It does no good to compare scores from different competitions. So we really shouldn't be even bringing Yu-Na Kim into this conversation. She isn't here.
Bookmarks