Personally to me, the main issue is not whether or not Yu-na would win at short, but whether the technical specialist downgraded the 3-3 jumps which should not be downgraded, and whether there was any intention even an inch, (ex, lower her scores and stop her dominance in short). If Yu-na couldn't win but the judge was fair, it's ok.
The issue of who should have won at short could be next. I still I think Yu-na should. She singled the flip, but her 3-3 was great. Even after (unfairly) downgraded (3-2), there is no way it is comparable with Miki's 3-2. She was a little shaky in 3-2 and the second jump should have been downgraded if Yuna's 3-3 should have beenn downgraded. It means (Yuna 3-2 and Miki 3-1 or even 2-1 when as strict as Yu-na's was judged). "..is it really ok to let someone who completely skipped a jump...win?" I think yes, depending on the other skaters' performances. You know skating is not all about jumps.
You said it's Tokyo, so we should accept the inflation or generous judge that Miki might receive. Well...I worry that many people think that way. Ok, then let's accept inflactions or generous judging on Canadian skaters that may happen at the Olympics. It's a kind of serious issue. That's why it seems that figure skating is becoming the sport of only a few countries. Do we still need this sport at the Olympics--the festival of the worlds?



Reply With Quote
. Please, be here when it does not happen and admit that you were wrong 


Bookmarks