- Joined
- Jun 5, 2014
I swear that I sometimes question her existence....like how?!? :eeking:
https://twitter.com/seungnyangi/status/699772812353875969
My gosh, she is not of this world... :shocked: :luv17:
I swear that I sometimes question her existence....like how?!? :eeking:
https://twitter.com/seungnyangi/status/699772812353875969
I swear that I sometimes question her existence....like how?!? :eeking:
https://twitter.com/seungnyangi/status/699772812353875969
There was this question(s) I had wanted to ask for quite sometime but every time I thought I'd post here, I'd later forget to do so. So I'm laying all down here to see if I can find my answers.
Lately, I've looked at score sheets where the Judgement by the tech caller doesn't make sense to me. Like the moment where Yuzuzu did a 3Lz-1Loop-3Sal in Olympics, but was only recognised with 3Lz-1Loop-SEQ (Meaning lesser marks)
But since this is a Yuna thread (even though I would be glad if someone could give me an explanation for the Olympic example above), I'm typing here to give two examples of Yuna's deductions that I simply didn't get from the technical caller (which doesn't involve the edge calls on flip that one might consider unfair or the step sequence level at Sochi LP). So here it goes:-
1) The Spiral Sequence from World's 2008 SP. https://youtu.be/dqrrk1xxZBA?t=1m10s
The edge change seems to be there. The positions and the speed seem to be there. And the time of the position held seem to be all right. So I don't understand how this Sequence got a Level 1.
2) and this one was a truly confounding one.... https://youtu.be/aUPli-YWzWw?t=4m49s
I think she got marked for an invalidated position on the last combination spin, which equated to 0 points for the last spin combination. At first I thought, it was because she had done the canonball position twice. But then I realised she had done the same for Vancouver and was granted points. It's not even a case of using the same leg twice for both cannonball. So I was wondering if someone had picked on why she got penalised for it.
I don't know about 1), but about 2), I remember reading that the spin had to have flying entrance. Up until GPF, she indeed did flying camel spin and had no level problem. For some reason she didn't do so at the Worlds. It seemed intended, because she also did it without flying during practice session.
But in the end, that was the historic competition where she broke 200 barrier for the first time and nobody seemed to care about that minor(?) hiccup.
Lately, I've looked at score sheets where the Judgement by the tech caller doesn't make sense to me. Like the moment where Yuzuzu did a 3Lz-1Loop-3Sal in Olympics, but was only recognised with 3Lz-1Loop-SEQ (Meaning lesser marks)
I don't really get this video from Olympics but Yuna is there https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhioK3-CVv0
Also http://www.olympic.org/news/kjetil-jansrud-and-yuna-kim-give-star-studded-start-to-lillehammer-2016/248302
I swear that I sometimes question her existence....like how?!? :eeking:
https://twitter.com/seungnyangi/status/699772812353875969
I looked at the 3Lz-1Loop-3Sal jump pass you mentioned carefully. After the middle 1Loop, Yuzuru ran out of energy, so his free was touching the ice for a while before he starts the 3Sal. In such a case, it's considered as a step, which breaks down the combination. There should be no step between the jumps in a jump-combination.
Thanks. The way the skaters usually take off, I assumed that skaters used their free leg to do the take off for the Salchow; that is until you pointed it out. Had to do some slow play on youtube to get a better look of how the salchow is supposed to take off.
I don't really get this video from Olympics but Yuna is there https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhioK3-CVv0
Also http://www.olympic.org/news/kjetil-jansrud-and-yuna-kim-give-star-studded-start-to-lillehammer-2016/248302
I don't know about 1), but about 2), I remember reading that the spin had to have flying entrance. Up until GPF, she indeed did flying camel spin and had no level problem. For some reason she didn't do so at the Worlds. It seemed intended, because she also did it without flying during practice session. My guess is someone on her team who was in charge of those technical stuff didn't double-check and made a mistake in figuring out and distributing level features.
But in the end, that was the historic competition where she broke 200 barrier for the first time and nobody seemed to care about that minor(?) hiccup.
I checked on that too. Unless they changed the rules after Worlds 2009 (which I don't know about), from the look of Vancouver, the final spin didn't need a flying entry, since she didn't do it in 2010 Olympics.
And amen to the last part.
Wow!! I love this version with piano:luv17:It'S SKIN TV commercials
30s version
15s version
http://gall.dcinside.com/board/view/?id=yeona&no=661768&page=1
http://gall.dcinside.com/board/view/?id=yeona&no=661769&page=1
http://gall.dcinside.com/board/view/?id=yeona&no=661770&page=1
http://gall.dcinside.com/board/view/?id=yeona&no=661751&page=1
It was because she didn't have a flying entrance to her first combination spin in 2009, it invalidated her final spin because it was also a combination spin, if you do 2 combination spins in the FS one should be a flying combination spin, she had hip problems practicing the flying entrance so she was forgoing it in practice but would do it when it came to competition time so ensure that she would not be injured while practicing but she accidentally forgot it and her team forgot to follow up, everyone blamed themselves after but she was just so far ahead of the pack, didn't matter. She performs the spin with the flying entrance at the Olympics so she got all the points.
And about that spiral question, I'm not really sure =P