Hah! Bring him on. I'll throw my Iron Lotus at him (base value, 25.6 points)
What no one seems to be considering is the possibility that coaching teams -- who eat, live, and breathe competitive figure skating --
do know the rules. I think all skaters do whatever they can to maximize their scoring potential.
Plushenko front loaded his jumps because that gave him a better chance of landing them before fatigue set in. He did not do transitions between his biggest elements because if he had he might not have been able to complete the jumps. He intended to put a double loop on the end of his 4T/3T combo because he had read the rule book and knew that it was worth an extra point and a half -- but in the execurion it didn't work out.
Plushenko worked on his spins and footwork to try to attain higher levels and stronger GOE. And indeed, he did OK in these categories, but others were a little better.
Takahashi attempted the quad because, having read the manual, he knew that quads are the highest scoring elements. A successful quad was his best strategy to win the gold medal. (As it turned out, this was not such a big risk after all because even with a fall he still won the bronze.)
Evan added up his strengths and weaknesses and designed his program accordingly. I do not think there will be an asterisk beside his name in the Almanac saying, "not a true champion."
Everyone did what he could. They all left points on the table for the things they couldn't do. It turned out how it turned out. (Weir was robbed -- should have been fourth.

)
Bookmarks