- Joined
- Feb 23, 2010
... go!
Can we just close this thread before it even gets of the ground?
Ant
Agreed.
Michelle is Michelle and Yuna is Yuna.
End of discussion.
Why do people manage to bring Kwan into every thread?
Yuna has a 3-3 and Michelle never did...
I agree with most of the things you said. The only reason we may not want to compare yuna and mao is that we didn't actually see them compete, though.
It's too bad "the lark ascending" was never delivered to its full potential. The program itself had the BEST choreography. I wished that she used lark ascending for her olympics lp. or just use it again in competetive season sometime.. (highly unlikely since she said in public she doesn't like any birds in general )
Um...This is a Kwan thread.
I don't know how many triple-triples Yu-na has done in major competitions, but Michelle did it eleven times in her career. :yes:
Pretty sure Yuna has done it more times. But I thought toward the end of her career Michelle didn't do 3-3s anymore? Anyways, because Michelle skated under 6.0 I think it's hard to tell how she'd score under 2010 CoP.
Who said it would have to be under 2010 CoP?
Why not under 1990 era 6.0?
And who said it would have to be Michelle at the end of her career? I think the premise was if they competed in their prime. That doesn't mean 30 year Michelle vs 19 year old Yuna.
Is that how you saw it in one of your dreams?
How about this? We take Yuna, Michelle, and Mao and put them against 1976 Dorothy Hamill.
There would be school figures and no triple jumps.
How much would Dorothy win by?
Dorothy would win by a whole lot