03-06-2010, 02:16 PM
lol did you look at NBC slow mo? It is clear that her second 3A was NOT clearly rotated and
Originally Posted by miki88
it was more than 1/4 UR. You can hear the commentators questioning it as well.
Tech was just generous to her because she 's the only one to land it. If it was a
men's comp where everybody does 3A it was definitely a downgrade. Also, her 2T is UR as well
(more than 3A actually) but she gets a free pass on that one. It's a joke that people are
complaining about low GOE on her 3A combo. No speed, no distance, no creative
entry/exit, no flow, no impact, not synced with music, no ease...
it just doesn't meet any criteria for GOE. In fact, she's lucky she didn't get negative GOE.
03-06-2010, 02:18 PM
Everyone was overscored that night. If Mao can get away with 130 with that performance I don't think Yuna deserve any less than 150. Also, according to you, almost every single commentators around the world are uber/super Yuna fans then.
Originally Posted by rtureck
03-06-2010, 02:26 PM
Um I did watch the NBC broadcast, but I do not remember the commentators saying it was UR though. The commentators all said that she made history with the 3 3As. GOE is another story altogether but she did rotate her axels. Anyways, according to you who are basing your assumptions on commentators, yet I don't remember hearing any commentator say that Mao did not deserve her score though.
Originally Posted by Johnnnn
03-06-2010, 03:26 PM