
Originally Posted by
Poodlepal
The US girls have nothing to be ashamed of.
The person who won, Yu Na, was unbeatable, deserved to win, and was overmarked to boot. Nobody was getting ahead of her.
The person who came in 2nd broke the triple axel record. An exceptional performance
The person who came in 3rd was from the home country that had several people overmarked throughout the competition (although in her case, it was not egregious as it was in the men's and pairs as she did quite well), and was a sentimental favorite. She would be kept on the podium barring a total breakdown, which she did not have.
Nobody from any country was going to dislodge a clean-skating YuNa, Mao or Joannie. They had been around a long time and had the judge's respect and PCS points.
The US sent two borderline unknowns, who were several years younger than the medalists. Both finished in the top 7 and one was ONE SPOT OFF THE PODIUM. I believe Rachael was undermarked in case there was a meltdown from one of the favorites. Had she skated after them, she may have been higher, although probably not on the podium. She does have some weaknesses in her skating, and her program was boring. But she could have been somewhere around 4-5, certainly higher than Miki, whose artistry is worse.
If Joannie wasn't from Canada and didn't have such a sad tale, maybe Mirai would have gotten the bronze. Mirai made fewer mistakes than Joannie in the lp, at least to the naked eye.
The real question about US skating is not "Why didn't these two teenagers finish higher?" but "Where was our experienced adult skater with years of experience who had won the judges' respect during the quadrennial?"
The answer to that is: A--completely imploded and vanished (World Champion Kimmie) B--Fell Splat on the Ice (Alissa) or C--gave it up to go to Harvard, then made a halfhearted comeback attempt (Emily). D--Still around, but in a terrible slump (Former GPF short program winner Caroline)
Bookmarks