Re: ice dance - I , too, am finding this very odd. If H-M/C have retired,we haven't heard..if they have, surely they should have earned
one spot. I was happy for them because they would have regained funding last year, after falling out of that circle the year before. Correct me if I'm wrong , but doesn't SC funding..and international assignments.. go to the top 5 at Nats ?
As for P/I , the only thought that comes to mind is that with I/K moving up, SC may not want to let P/I fall behind, so to speak, and be perceived as part of a " younger " group going into the next O cycle..maybe they're betting that P/I 's phenomenal progress in their first year will continue exponentially in their second...
( I just know that I get very nervous when SC tries to make the smart play. They've been known to outwit themselves in the past.)
If anyone can allay my fears , talk me down ,or whatever , please do. Unless and until this is explained, I'm going to feel somewhat uncomfortable about this , as I did in the past few years over some of the marks W/P received ( or didn't receive) at the national level..
I like
all these couples ,I'd be happy to just let the chips fall where they may , but I confess to the occasional suspicion that one coaching team may be looked on slightly..and I stress
slightly..more favourably than another.
I hate to feel that way , so can anyone offer some reassurance ?

Bookmarks