Pairs long - placements 2-4
So everyone has ideas on what placements 2 - 4 should have been. Some believe S&S were held up, others that M&T were held down... Let's bring the discussion "in" a bit. The link here is to a table comparing specific elements and components of those three teams: http://ptichkafs.livejournal.com/48286.html. Underlined elements are the ones performed with that 2nd half bonus. Which SPECIFIC marks do you disagree with? Which SPECIFIC levels you think were too high/ too low? Where do you think the CoP levels are unfair?
Last edited by Ptichka; 03-25-2010 at 03:06 PM.