ETA:
IMO, Johnny Weir is simply not a good enough skater to have landed on the podium in 2010. He lacks speed, power, transitions, and choreography. Even so, he was rewarded for his long program at the Olympics as he got a PB of 156.77. He has usually scored in the 140-152 range on the international scene for the past two years. During his two GPs this year - both times in the FS he scored below 140. Even when he got 3rd at Worlds in 2008 (and was the second ranked American man coming out of Nationals) he only scored a 141.05 in the FS.
Evan Lysacek finished third at the 2005 and 2009 US Championships yet he managed to win a World bronze medal and a World Championship those same years. Why was he not held down if this "third skater syndrome" is indeed true?
Yes, and the judges got it right, as technically Weir did outskate Lambiel, Chan and Takahashi:
but definetely not in PCS and that is Weir´s own fault and for the combined results (his 6th place freeskate finish) he should not blame anyone else but his easy (except jumps of course) and empty freeskate programme.
I feel it is sad that Weir does not understand better the sport where he has been competing.
The problem is not so much that his marks were too low as it is that other competitors' marks were too high. Stephane Lambiel received the highest PCS of the night for an incredibly tepid performance and a program that is far from his best.
Or maybe Johnny, as "I love to Skate" pointed out simply does not show the speed and power or CoP choreo needed to beat some of the top skaters. Come to think of it - when in the past has Weir ever won a notable title?
His US titles were mostly before the CoP era and even in 2006, the last time Johnny won the CoP was much different.
I think the argument that Weir deserved to be on the podium in Vancouver is weak and without merit. It is not only weak but silly to think US Skating tried to hold him back. That argument could hold weight at US Natls - where all of the judges are from the US Skating federation.
It was actually Takahashi who got the highest PCS:
http://www.isuresults.com/results/owg2010/SEG002.HTM
The numbers are meaningless. Johnny didn't skate nearly as well at any of those other competitions as he did at Nationals. And, again, if one more person says Johnny's program "had no transitions" I am going to scream. That's completely a lie.
Kozuka received the LOWEST score for skating skills out of the top competitors, despite being among the best in that regard. It's all wrong.
Where exactly are all these transitions you are talking about? Please show me. He does back double threes into a triple loop, a spread eagle after the loop, and an ina bauer into a triple salchow. He does cross cuts in between his elements for the most part, except occasionally when he will do a three turn or a mohawk. The majority of his jumps are telegraphed and then he will do some posing on the ice - such as where he will put his hands to his face and throw back his head. Really, it is absolutely a choreographically empty program. I can't see how you would say otherwise.
Kozuka has good skating skills but they are not among the best in the World.
I went back to review the protocols of the men's competition and Weir's scores on all PCS segments were comparatively lower than the men above him. He had 7's for all the segments while the other 5 above him had mostly 8's. I think he at least deseved 8's for performance/execution and interpretation.
Oh, you did not just pull that crap. Johnny should have won 2008 Nationals by a very safe margin over Lysacek.
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
You don't seem to understand the power individual federations have over their own skaters. You should also read up on political lobbying (like, in the WORLD in general). If a federation tells the judges to consider one of their skaters above another one of their skaters, the judges WILL score the event accordingly. Only big mistakes by "the chosen skater" will allow the other skater to pull ahead.
.
You just named 3 transitions, darling.
As for the choreography, if arm movements and "posing" interpret the music and create emotions then what is wrong with that. I fail to see how a boring transition that doesn't intepret the music is better. If you look at Michelle Kwan's "Tosca" there wasn't complex choreography going on either. Just a lot of "simple" movements that brilliantly reflected the music and had a ton of heart and emotion. Ditto for her "Lyra Angelica". Those two programs are remembered as classics these days.
Yes they are and you're not looking properly if you say otherwise. Look at the ease with which he builds speed, changes feet/direction, comes to stops, and the depth of his edges. He is so much better than Lysacek and his program was far more difficult and emotionally satisfying as well.
One does not deserve high performance/execution scores for something that is simple.
Wow, three whole transitions in a program! That definitely belongs on the podium...
That comes down to 6.0 vs COP. Choreography standards have changed over the years. I don't think Tosca is a classic - her performance at Nationals is what was remembered, not the choreography of the program. Lyra Angelica is much more than arm movements and posing - that program was a masterpiece. The way she switches her front foot on her ina bauer sequence is one of my most favourite moments in skating.
Kozuka is one of my favourites - but no his skills are not World class yet.
well plushenko had less than 3 and was on the podiumWow, three whole transitions in a program! That definitely belongs on the podium...
Kozuka has good skating skills but they are not among the best in the World.
You're being willfully ignorant. His spread eagles are 100x better than Lysacek's. His turns and ability to change edges are 100x better. His ability to gain speed without pumping into the ice is 100x better. His blade control all around is so much more superior. If you critically examine the performances objectively you would see these things and also recognize that Lysacek has the WEAKEST skating skills out of any of the top competitors (aside from Oda maybe). His edges and flow over the ice are distinctly inferior. Just because he does transitions and has ice presence and the name of "Frank Carroll" behind him, that doesn't mean he is an excellent basic skater.
Get a grip Blades!
'08 Natls may have been disputable - but I never before heard anyone claim that Johnny should have won "by a very safe margin." Such an "opinion" seems out of touch with the way skating is judged.
As to the influence of federations - hmmmm, can we assume that in '98 the US federation was lobbying behind the scenes for Tara? :sheesh:
Or is it known that the USA judge placed Michelle first? Since Michelle was our Natl champion and skated pretty well in Nagano how do you explain Tara's win?
I guess that is just another example of me not understanding how National federations controll the outcome of international events.
Did I ever say that Evan has World class skating skills??? I believe I listed Chan, Dai, and Lambiel as my examples. I made no mention of Evan (by the way, I don't think he has world class SS). I find that you continue to drag Evan down no matter what. Just like he was the one who made untruthful and juvenile remarks - yet Johnny's remarks were truthful and not juvenile, right? :disapp: Perhaps you are the ignorant one...
he is not??? thats indeed news flash for menot that I care much, but I didnt know honestly:think:But hey, NEWS FLASH, Tom Cruise is straight and his relationships with Nicole Kidman, Penelope Cruz, and Katie Holmes have all been real and not setup by his management.
Oh, wait....
whenever you cannot find "a link" , you can always "link" to your own post as a reliable source, I ll start doing itYes better we better not talk about it because there is no "link" to prove it. Things in the World are only real if there is an internet link talking about it. :sheesh: