I think you're method of giving bonuses if there have to be bonuses is much better than what is going on right now in free skates. I don't think the authors of COP realised just how much the focus would be on that halfway mark. It is not just a bonus period. It is a higher level of free skate. It is a free skate worth much more than the other free skate. Free skate from zero to two minutes or zero to two and a half minutes is like a second short program rather than being a part of the free skate. I know for a while there were two free skates. At the 2003 grand prix final the second free skate was worth 50% of the total. Now they have taken that and brought it under one free skate which I don't think makes any sense.
THE LONG PROGRAM - why it needs variety and what CoP can do.
- Thread starter Blades of Passion
- Start date
I think you're method of giving bonuses if there have to be bonuses is much better than what is going on right now in free skates. I don't think the authors of COP realised just how much the focus would be on that halfway mark. It is not just a bonus period. It is a higher level of free skate. It is a free skate worth much more than the other free skate. Free skate from zero to two minutes or zero to two and a half minutes is like a second short program rather than being a part of the free skate. I know for a while there were two free skates. At the 2003 grand prix final the second free skate was worth 50% of the total. Now they have taken that and brought it under one free skate which I don't think makes any sense.
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
^ Although, in a way it has always been like that. The free program used to be three programs in one, each completely separate and often performed to completely different and unrelated music.
The skater started out with a bang and did as many jumps as possible till she ran out of steam. Then there was the slow part (imaginatively called the "slow part"
), where she rested. posed, waved her arms languidly, and maybe did a spin or two.
Then after she had caught her breath she went for the final flurry and big big ta-da finish. :yes:
The skater started out with a bang and did as many jumps as possible till she ran out of steam. Then there was the slow part (imaginatively called the "slow part"
), where she rested. posed, waved her arms languidly, and maybe did a spin or two.Then after she had caught her breath she went for the final flurry and big big ta-da finish. :yes:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2009
But I thought the whole point of it was to give skaters more options to showcase a wider range of talents, in a way that befits whatever piece of music or theme they've chosen. If they don't do it optimally, then isn't it better for it to be up to the judges to mark down Choreography or Interpretation or GoE of the element itself?
So the only way for Mao to be able to do her two 3Axels and two 3Flips is if she has Plushenko-like ability to do a 3Axel-halfloop-3Flip?
Mean! Especially considering you're letting skaters like Laura Lepisto get away with doing two 3Loops + two 3Toeloops and no 3Flip or 3Salchow. (See below for reply to ImaginaryPogue.)I like the idea of a complete-set bonus much better than the implementation of this Zayak addendum. And if you really want, maybe every repeated jump has a 4.0 base value, regardless of the type?
Yeah, I'm sorry this is one of the more boring topics to be discussing, but it's just the most immediate problem that popped out at me.
I like it.
That's a nice program! I really like it from 1:39-1:52. It's too bad her face isn't a little more expressive...and she doesn't seem very happy in the K&C.
I did this too
and conversely, Rachel Flatt actually does do a complete set of triples. Someone who fulfills BoP's restrictions on repeated triples, Lepisto (as I said above), is only doing three types of triples. So, I don't see how the proposed Zayak addition would encourage greater roundedness in jumps, nor do I see a strict need for it based on the fact that Flatt who "violates" it actually does show well-rounded jumping ability.I kinda like that idea, too. Although I recall Joesitz calling for no music, no choreo, nothing...just a straight skills demonstration. I think you can compromise a little here. The only problem I see with this suggestion is that if a quad is still more valued over a triple, there is still some (technical score) incentive to do it in the FS.
I think some skaters aren't interested in showing a "softer side."Many quad attempts by men are like this. I guess the idea is that if they already showed that they can do a quad in the technical program, then they could show their softer side in the free and do a gorgeous triple Axel instead.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
prettykeys said:
AP never looked happy. The scuttlebutt on this rising star was that she never wanted to be a figure skater at all, but her mother made her.
As soon as she was old enough to defy her mom and quit, she did. At last report (a couple of years ago now) she was living it up as a devil-may-care young bachelorette in New York.
- Joined
- May 15, 2009
Here is a link to an article about Ann. She was a very talented skater but it seemed like it was her mom's dream and not hers..
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4191/is_20060224/ai_n16181555/?tag=content;col1
Back to the topic (regarding more interesting programs) - what about the second half jump bonus? Fans of the frontloaders hate this rule but wasn't it created to try make programs more interesting?
Is this rule being abused and making programs dull? Dai takes advantage of the rule and his program was my favorite last season.
I think the rule has been abused to make programs dull and predictable. NBC rain this timer on some skaters and said now it's halfway and jumps will begin. I found it to be like the first half of the program was meaningless.
^ Although, in a way it has always been like that. The free program used to be three programs in one, each completely separate and often performed to completely different and unrelated music.
The skater started out with a bang and did as many jumps as possible till she ran out of steam. Then there was the slow part (imaginatively called the "slow part"
Then after she had caught her breath she went for the final flurry and big big ta-da finish. :yes:
This is true but I find it is actually preferable than to what is going on now! I'd rather a middle section be a rest period than the whole first half be a rest period.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2008
If a program has 3 jumps in the beginning and 5 in the end back to back and a skater killing time in between, then it is as much interesting as a frontloaded program.
So there are the frontloders and the others we call them backloaders?It sounds like Ghostbusters!
Nice thread, Im trying to read from the start now!
How much did Dai take advantage last year of the second half rule?:scratch:
So there are the frontloders and the others we call them backloaders?
It sounds like Ghostbusters!Nice thread, Im trying to read from the start now!
How much did Dai take advantage last year of the second half rule?:scratch:
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2010
I think the simplest way to correct this is to maintain the 10% bonus in the second half but limit it to no more than the last 4 jump passes (or 5 for the men). For example, if a lady does 6 of her 7 jump passes in the second-half, then only the last 4 jump passes get the bonus. This way, they'll be encouraged neither to front load or back load a program. And if the program/music calls for it they can back load their jumps, but they won't get an inordinate amount of bonuses for it.
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
At the Olympics he attempted
4T
3A+2T
3Lo
-------------------
3F+3T*
3S*
3A*
3Lz*
3Lz+2T+2Lo*
If he had been smart he would have put the 2T on the second triple Axel instead of the first. That would have gained him an extra thirteen hundredths of a point.
- Joined
- May 15, 2009
Thanx Mm, I really didnt remember it that way from Worlds,i think with Dai time passes fast and you dont realize he is in the second half already
I think I see what you mean - Dai's program really has a nice flow.
Here he is from Worlds - and he does three jumping passes in the first half and five in the second.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_srq33rKW2I&p=EBCF2FFFB7E3756B&playnext=1&index=29
In skating they try to give the harder jumps more points. Jumps done after the halfway point when skaters are not as fresh are considered harder and thus the 10% bonus.
I think Dai's program was the nicest, best paced and most interesting and creative LP of the year. It had a sense of freedom to it and he used the changing moods of the music extremely well.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
I don't know why I looked this up, but I did. 
Here is the breakdown of first and second half jumps of all the men in LP at the Olympics.
Lysacek 3-5
Plushenko 5-3
Takahashi 3-5
Lambiel 4-4
Chan 3-5
Weir 4-4
Oda 3-5
Kozuka 3-5
Abbott 4-4
Brezina 3-5
Dennis Ten 6-2
Amodio 3-5
Brezina 5-3
Fernadez 3-5
Schultheiss 6-2
Joubert 5-3
Van der Perren 3-5
Contesti 3-5
Verner 3-5
Bacchini 3-5
Pfeifer 4-4
Lindemann 4-4
Chipeur 4-4 (He got eight hundredths of a point more for his single Axel in the second half than for his single axel in the first half.)
Kovaleski 5-3
Here is the breakdown of first and second half jumps of all the men in LP at the Olympics.Lysacek 3-5
Plushenko 5-3
Takahashi 3-5
Lambiel 4-4
Chan 3-5
Weir 4-4
Oda 3-5
Kozuka 3-5
Abbott 4-4
Brezina 3-5
Dennis Ten 6-2
Amodio 3-5
Brezina 5-3
Fernadez 3-5
Schultheiss 6-2
Joubert 5-3
Van der Perren 3-5
Contesti 3-5
Verner 3-5
Bacchini 3-5
Pfeifer 4-4
Lindemann 4-4
Chipeur 4-4 (He got eight hundredths of a point more for his single Axel in the second half than for his single axel in the first half.)
Kovaleski 5-3
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2009
Contesti and Verner should consider changing the 5-3 format, they both have a tendency to run out of steam at the end of the FS.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
- Country
-
RE: The extended Zayak rule for female programs
It has admittedly become less common than it used to be, but it still happens and skaters often do it because they are leaving out other jumps. Even when female skaters aren't leaving out other jumps, like Flatt, I still think it's excessive. Don't forget how much she gets criticized for her artistry, and also how several of those Lutz/Flip attempts got downgraded at Olympics/Worlds last season. Her programs would look better, and thus she would gain more points, if she focused less on repeating one of those jumps yet again. She's trying to do a 3Loop as the second part of a combination this season, which means she took out the solo 3Loop in order to keep doing two Lutzes and two Flips. Her program would look better if she took out one Lutz or one Flip, which have the most similar entrances among any two scored jumps in the sport, and instead repeated the 3Loop.
Darn it, you found one.
Okay, so one program from a Junior skater before CoP. Make note that the program would have been better off with a 3Toe rather than a 3Flip at the end. Ann Patrice takes off from the wrong edge on her Flip, so it's not likely that she would have been able to incorporate that jump as seamlessly if she had to focus harder to take off from a better edge.
I don't see the rule as "taking away options" in a bad way. The Zayak rule is a necessary one and this would just be a slightly further extension of it. I feel that programs would look better 99.999% of the time if female skaters who attempted to repeat multiple jumps from the *3Axel/3Lutz/3Flip* group would instead change one of those jumps to an "easier" jump. If a female skater wants to flaunt their mastery of both the 3Lutz and 3Flip, I think the best way to do it is by putting a 3Toe (or 3Loop, or half-loop+3Sal) on the end of those jumps. I would almost always rather see a 3Lutz+3Toe, 3Lutz, 3Flip+3Toe female program than a 3Lutz, 3Lutz, 3Flip, 3Flip female program (given equally good execution for both programs).
Using only the Olympics as the bar isn't enough. A lot of really good skaters don't get to go to the Olympics because of the depth in their countries. Many of those skaters are the ones I'm talking about who repeat both the Lutz and Flip. YUKARI NAKANO only started trying to repeat both the Lutz and Flip because she couldn't get any credit for her 3Axel attempts under the old rules but, assuming she was having problems with the 3Axel and took it out for the season anyway, it's not good that the rules promote female skaters choreographing 4 jumping passes to start with a 3Lutz or 3Flip. Look at her program:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijr4vc6noRk
The first 4 jumping passes are all a Lutz or Flip. It's too static. She is an inventive skater and there is some good choreography in this program, but it's dragged down by so many CoP rules that detract from the flow and look of the whole program. In addition to the "too many Lutzes/Flips" issue, she has that ungainly +2Toe+2Toe combination. Her footwork takes up too much time and doesn't match the character of the program because she's so worried about simply trying to attain Level 3 rather than interpreting the music and moving across with speed and flair.
I don't think females repeating these jumps multiple times showcases a "wider range" of talents, though. As I said in reply to gkelly, trying to do the jumps as part of difficult combinations shows more skill and looks better than simply repeating one of them yet again. It's less of a problem for male programs because they have an additional jumping pass and are also simply better at jumping (generally), so it doesn't look as laborious and the issue of purposefully leaving out certain Triples isn't nearly as common.
As for the Choreography/Interpretation score...yes judges can and SHOULD always do that to buffer against poor choreography that is transparently trying to gain points. I think a proactive rule is good, though. It's like when a dog pees a little on a tile floor. Yeah, it can be cleaned up, but wouldn't we have rather not seen the piss in the first place?
(this topic is the least important one in my manifesto and yet so much talk about it - LOL!)
It has admittedly become less common than it used to be, but it still happens and skaters often do it because they are leaving out other jumps. Even when female skaters aren't leaving out other jumps, like Flatt, I still think it's excessive. Don't forget how much she gets criticized for her artistry, and also how several of those Lutz/Flip attempts got downgraded at Olympics/Worlds last season. Her programs would look better, and thus she would gain more points, if she focused less on repeating one of those jumps yet again. She's trying to do a 3Loop as the second part of a combination this season, which means she took out the solo 3Loop in order to keep doing two Lutzes and two Flips. Her program would look better if she took out one Lutz or one Flip, which have the most similar entrances among any two scored jumps in the sport, and instead repeated the 3Loop.
Darn it, you found one.
Okay, so one program from a Junior skater before CoP. Make note that the program would have been better off with a 3Toe rather than a 3Flip at the end. Ann Patrice takes off from the wrong edge on her Flip, so it's not likely that she would have been able to incorporate that jump as seamlessly if she had to focus harder to take off from a better edge.
I don't see the rule as "taking away options" in a bad way. The Zayak rule is a necessary one and this would just be a slightly further extension of it. I feel that programs would look better 99.999% of the time if female skaters who attempted to repeat multiple jumps from the *3Axel/3Lutz/3Flip* group would instead change one of those jumps to an "easier" jump. If a female skater wants to flaunt their mastery of both the 3Lutz and 3Flip, I think the best way to do it is by putting a 3Toe (or 3Loop, or half-loop+3Sal) on the end of those jumps. I would almost always rather see a 3Lutz+3Toe, 3Lutz, 3Flip+3Toe female program than a 3Lutz, 3Lutz, 3Flip, 3Flip female program (given equally good execution for both programs).
Using only the Olympics as the bar isn't enough. A lot of really good skaters don't get to go to the Olympics because of the depth in their countries. Many of those skaters are the ones I'm talking about who repeat both the Lutz and Flip. YUKARI NAKANO only started trying to repeat both the Lutz and Flip because she couldn't get any credit for her 3Axel attempts under the old rules but, assuming she was having problems with the 3Axel and took it out for the season anyway, it's not good that the rules promote female skaters choreographing 4 jumping passes to start with a 3Lutz or 3Flip. Look at her program:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijr4vc6noRk
The first 4 jumping passes are all a Lutz or Flip. It's too static. She is an inventive skater and there is some good choreography in this program, but it's dragged down by so many CoP rules that detract from the flow and look of the whole program. In addition to the "too many Lutzes/Flips" issue, she has that ungainly +2Toe+2Toe combination. Her footwork takes up too much time and doesn't match the character of the program because she's so worried about simply trying to attain Level 3 rather than interpreting the music and moving across with speed and flair.
I don't think females repeating these jumps multiple times showcases a "wider range" of talents, though. As I said in reply to gkelly, trying to do the jumps as part of difficult combinations shows more skill and looks better than simply repeating one of them yet again. It's less of a problem for male programs because they have an additional jumping pass and are also simply better at jumping (generally), so it doesn't look as laborious and the issue of purposefully leaving out certain Triples isn't nearly as common.
As for the Choreography/Interpretation score...yes judges can and SHOULD always do that to buffer against poor choreography that is transparently trying to gain points. I think a proactive rule is good, though. It's like when a dog pees a little on a tile floor. Yeah, it can be cleaned up, but wouldn't we have rather not seen the piss in the first place?
(this topic is the least important one in my manifesto and yet so much talk about it - LOL!)
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
- Country
-
Now the other topics
Dai didn't take advantage of it like many of the other 3-5 layouts do. He put a Triple Axel in the second half of the program after already having done a 3-3 combination and a 3Sal. That's much more difficult, but he didn't get extra credit for it.
It's the same for Kozuka. He put a Triple Axel in the second half after doing a 3Sal-2Toe-2Loop and a Spin in the second half.
These skaters actually choreographed their programs to BUILD and create emotion rather than just sequencing everything to take advantage of the CoP rules. In addition to their awesome skating skills and excellent performances, that is why they deserved the highest PCS at the Olympics.
Yeah, I HATE the timer that some broadcasts have used at times to show when the second half of the LP begins. It breaks the feeling of the program because we are pulled out of the performance and start thinking about real-time. That's one of the reasons why watching a film (without checking your watch/phone/DvD menu) is different than reading a book - you can physically feel and see how much of the book is remaining while you read, whereas in a film you aren't quite sure exactly how much time is left (given ideal viewing conditions). It's the same for an ice skating performance - you want to be lost in the moment and feel like time is moving differently.
So, yes, I do think moving the bonus section back to 60% is best. That makes it more difficult to cram in jumps - the skater will be more tired at that point and the bonus will be more deserved. I'll have to consider the exact bonuses that should be given out. Doing more difficult Triples (and Quads) and 3-3 combinations should be given a significantly bigger bonus. That way you wouldn't just see people doing their very hardest jumps earlier and then saving everything else for the 60% mark to get a bonus.
Lysacek's LP last season (shouldn't have been called Level 4 anyway because he didn't have enough quick turns in both directions).
Samuel Contesti's SP - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQ2TIvOhV_c
Mao Asada, Carolina Kostner, and Miki Ando all attempt Level 4 footwork, but it pretty much always just gets called as Level 3. Still, look at how much time is wasted and how convoluted the patterns become:
Carolina Kostner
Miki Ando
Mao Asada - Asada is better at this kind of footwork than the other Ladies but it's too convoluted and time consuming nonetheless. Clock the amount of time it took to finish that step sequence - 37 seconds for one technical element.
And plenty of others I can't think of off the top of the head. It's frequent that skaters try to get Level 4, though, and can't do it well enough and only get Level 3. They should instead be focusing on doing a really good Level 3 or Level 2 footwork sequence, rather than putting in all kinds of unnecessary and ungainly steps and turns in an attempt to get Level 4.
Dai didn't take advantage of it like many of the other 3-5 layouts do. He put a Triple Axel in the second half of the program after already having done a 3-3 combination and a 3Sal. That's much more difficult, but he didn't get extra credit for it.
It's the same for Kozuka. He put a Triple Axel in the second half after doing a 3Sal-2Toe-2Loop and a Spin in the second half.
These skaters actually choreographed their programs to BUILD and create emotion rather than just sequencing everything to take advantage of the CoP rules. In addition to their awesome skating skills and excellent performances, that is why they deserved the highest PCS at the Olympics.
Yeah, I HATE the timer that some broadcasts have used at times to show when the second half of the LP begins. It breaks the feeling of the program because we are pulled out of the performance and start thinking about real-time. That's one of the reasons why watching a film (without checking your watch/phone/DvD menu) is different than reading a book - you can physically feel and see how much of the book is remaining while you read, whereas in a film you aren't quite sure exactly how much time is left (given ideal viewing conditions). It's the same for an ice skating performance - you want to be lost in the moment and feel like time is moving differently.
So, yes, I do think moving the bonus section back to 60% is best. That makes it more difficult to cram in jumps - the skater will be more tired at that point and the bonus will be more deserved. I'll have to consider the exact bonuses that should be given out. Doing more difficult Triples (and Quads) and 3-3 combinations should be given a significantly bigger bonus. That way you wouldn't just see people doing their very hardest jumps earlier and then saving everything else for the 60% mark to get a bonus.
Lysacek's LP last season (shouldn't have been called Level 4 anyway because he didn't have enough quick turns in both directions).
Samuel Contesti's SP - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQ2TIvOhV_c
Mao Asada, Carolina Kostner, and Miki Ando all attempt Level 4 footwork, but it pretty much always just gets called as Level 3. Still, look at how much time is wasted and how convoluted the patterns become:
Carolina Kostner
Miki Ando
Mao Asada - Asada is better at this kind of footwork than the other Ladies but it's too convoluted and time consuming nonetheless. Clock the amount of time it took to finish that step sequence - 37 seconds for one technical element.
And plenty of others I can't think of off the top of the head. It's frequent that skaters try to get Level 4, though, and can't do it well enough and only get Level 3. They should instead be focusing on doing a really good Level 3 or Level 2 footwork sequence, rather than putting in all kinds of unnecessary and ungainly steps and turns in an attempt to get Level 4.
Last edited:
And pretty much all her triples were cheated and would have been downgraded by last year's rules -- by this year's most might get the 70% value. So how would her whole strategy have been different if she knew that she had to work harder on getting full rotation for it to be worth including the triples at all.
Also triple toe was always her worst triple, which she doubled in that performance.
One size does not fit all. Different skaters have different strengths and weaknesses. It's unusual for 3T to be the worst triple, but for a real-life skater who can't do it reliably, repeating it would not be a good idea even if BoP thinks it would look better in general on an ideal hypothetical skater.
And looking better to you is not a good reason for instituting a restriction
A good reason for restricting certain options would be if those options gave some skaters an unfair advantage. But all skaters have the same opportunities to choose which jumps to repeat. Each skater is going to make that choice based on what she can do best.
A good reason would be if choosing that option requires skaters to leave out skills that are considered fundamental (e.g., the recent requirement of "an axel-type jump").
A good reason might be to prevent overuse of skills that are known to have an especially high risk of serious injury.
Restrictions should be made for the good of the sport and the good of the skaters.
If the rules give plenty of options with which each skater can maximize her own scoring potential, you'll see a variety of different program layouts. Some will be more interesting or more aesthetically pleasing than others to you. Other observers may have different preferences or may not care much about the specific choice of jump repeats.
If the rules restrict potential jump layouts, then skaters who are able to do all the jumps with equal reliability will choose whatever distribution of jumps maximizes their points within those restrictions. And you'll see a lot more skaters doing the same layout you thought you would like better, until you get tired of that one too.
What if she's not capable of putting another triple jump on the back of a combination? What if her "mastery" of the flip and lutz that she wants to flaunt is the fact that she makes very clear distinctions between the inside and outside edge takeoffs, she's capable of doing each with interesting preceding steps or other moves, and she is capable of putting those jumps at the end of the program? There are different ways to make repeated jumps interesting, and you're only allowing some of them. There are also lots of ways to make repeated jumps boring, and no matter what restrictions you put in, there are going to be lots of boring programs. Better to penalize the boring ones for their boringness in the PCS and reward the rarer skaters who do the exact same jumps in interesting ways.
Using only the Olympics as the bar isn't enough. A lot of really good skaters don't get to go to the Olympics because of the depth in their countries. Many of those skaters are the ones I'm talking about who repeat both the Lutz and Flip. YUKARI NAKANO only started trying to repeat both the Lutz and Flip because she couldn't get any credit for her 3Axel attempts under the old rules but, assuming she was having problems with the 3Axel and took it out for the season anyway, it's not good that the rules promote female skaters choreographing 4 jumping passes to start with a 3Lutz or 3Flip. Look at her program:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijr4vc6noRk
The first 4 jumping passes are all a Lutz or Flip. It's too static. She is an inventive skater and there is some good choreography in this program, but it's dragged down by so many CoP rules that detract from the flow and look of the whole program. In addition to the "too many Lutzes/Flips" issue, she has that ungainly +2Toe+2Toe combination. Her footwork takes up too much time and doesn't match the character of the program because she's so worried about simply trying to attain Level 3 rather than interpreting the music and moving across with speed and flair.
I don't think females repeating these jumps multiple times showcases a "wider range" of talents, though. As I said in reply to gkelly, trying to do the jumps as part of difficult combinations shows more skill and looks better than simply repeating one of them yet again. It's less of a problem for male programs because they have an additional jumping pass and are also simply better at jumping (generally), so it doesn't look as laborious and the issue of purposefully leaving out certain Triples isn't nearly as common.
As for the Choreography/Interpretation score...yes judges can and SHOULD always do that to buffer against poor choreography that is transparently trying to gain points. I think a proactive rule is good, though. It's like when a dog pees a little on a tile floor. Yeah, it can be cleaned up, but wouldn't we have rather not seen the piss in the first place?
(this topic is the least important one in my manifesto and yet so much talk about it - LOL!)[/QUOTE]
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2010
ITA. While BoP's modified Zayak rule may prevent boring/unappealing repetitions of lutzes and flips, it does not prevent bad repetitions of 3T, 3S or 3L. I think it's a rather arbitrary and unnecessary restriction with a very weak justification. We might as well ban boringness from programs.
By the way, Blades of Passion hasn't even talked about how he would modify the program components part of the judging system, which is critical since it accounts for about 50% of a skater's scores.
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2010
It has admittedly become less common than it used to be, but it still happens and skaters often do it because they are leaving out other jumps. Even when female skaters aren't leaving out other jumps, like Flatt, I still think it's excessive. Don't forget how much she gets criticized for her artistry, and also how several of those Lutz/Flip attempts got downgraded at Olympics/Worlds last season. Her programs would look better, and thus she would gain more points, if she focused less on repeating one of those jumps yet again. She's trying to do a 3Loop as the second part of a combination this season, which means she took out the solo 3Loop in order to keep doing two Lutzes and two Flips. Her program would look better if she took out one Lutz or one Flip, which have the most similar entrances among any two scored jumps in the sport, and instead repeated the 3Loop.
Darn it, you found one.
Okay, so one program from a Junior skater before CoP. Make note that the program would have been better off with a 3Toe rather than a 3Flip at the end. Ann Patrice takes off from the wrong edge on her Flip, so it's not likely that she would have been able to incorporate that jump as seamlessly if she had to focus harder to take off from a better edge.
I don't see the rule as "taking away options" in a bad way. The Zayak rule is a necessary one and this would just be a slightly further extension of it. I feel that programs would look better 99.999% of the time if female skaters who attempted to repeat multiple jumps from the *3Axel/3Lutz/3Flip* group would instead change one of those jumps to an "easier" jump. If a female skater wants to flaunt their mastery of both the 3Lutz and 3Flip, I think the best way to do it is by putting a 3Toe (or 3Loop, or half-loop+3Sal) on the end of those jumps. I would almost always rather see a 3Lutz+3Toe, 3Lutz, 3Flip+3Toe female program than a 3Lutz, 3Lutz, 3Flip, 3Flip female program (given equally good execution for both programs).
Using only the Olympics as the bar isn't enough. A lot of really good skaters don't get to go to the Olympics because of the depth in their countries. Many of those skaters are the ones I'm talking about who repeat both the Lutz and Flip. YUKARI NAKANO only started trying to repeat both the Lutz and Flip because she couldn't get any credit for her 3Axel attempts under the old rules but, assuming she was having problems with the 3Axel and took it out for the season anyway, it's not good that the rules promote female skaters choreographing 4 jumping passes to start with a 3Lutz or 3Flip. Look at her program:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijr4vc6noRk
The first 4 jumping passes are all a Lutz or Flip. It's too static. She is an inventive skater and there is some good choreography in this program, but it's dragged down by so many CoP rules that detract from the flow and look of the whole program. In addition to the "too many Lutzes/Flips" issue, she has that ungainly +2Toe+2Toe combination. Her footwork takes up too much time and doesn't match the character of the program because she's so worried about simply trying to attain Level 3 rather than interpreting the music and moving across with speed and flair.
I don't think females repeating these jumps multiple times showcases a "wider range" of talents, though. As I said in reply to gkelly, trying to do the jumps as part of difficult combinations shows more skill and looks better than simply repeating one of them yet again. It's less of a problem for male programs because they have an additional jumping pass and are also simply better at jumping (generally), so it doesn't look as laborious and the issue of purposefully leaving out certain Triples isn't nearly as common.
(this topic is the least important one in my manifesto and yet so much talk about it - LOL!)
My question for you is the justification for this rule (and perhaps even the overall philosophy of your proposed IJS version 2): what is a good justification for a rule and what is not?
Your whole argument seems to be that it would be better, and while I might agree with you, is that sufficient justification for making it a rule? There are a lot of ways each skater could improve their programs. Which of these ideals should be enforced on a skater and which should be left to their choice?
Take the base value of jumps, as an example. The justification behind the increasing scale of values is two-fold: 1) More difficult jumps should as a matter of fairness receive greater reward for their successful execution, and 2) Skaters should be encouraged to attempt technically difficult elements since a skating program should showcase the skater's technical skills and mastery of the technical elements of figure skating.
I agree with you on the overall reason for changing Code of Points: the long program should be less restricted to allow for a greater variety in its structure and components. This would enable more artistic freedom and consequently, better programs.
However, you seem to want to go beyond that: not just allow for more creativity and variety, but to enforce "good" creativity and "better" variety. I say this is not a good justification. Let the judges decide and score a program accordingly whether the elements chosen and executed constitute a good, well-balanced variety and contribute to the artistic interpretation of the music. So if a skater repeats both the lutz and the flip, the judges will either reward or punish such repetition depending on its impact on the overall program and the way in which they were repeated.
This is one of the main reasons why we have GOE for technical elements: we try to separate the objective consideration (base value) from the good/bad evaluations. We don't ban the flutz, the lip or the toe-axel, incorrect and unpleasant as they may be. Instead, poor technique is given its own separate evaluation apart from the jump itself, which has a fixed objective value.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
- Country
-
None of Ann Patrice's Triples deserved to be downgraded. Some of them were sketchy but they weren't more than 1/4, taking into account where she left the ice. Her second 3Lutz was actually wonderful.
She wouldn't have to repeat the Triple Toe under the rules I've put forth. She could repeat the Loop or Salchow. Or she could *gasp* only attempt a total of 6 Triples and do another element instead of attempting 7 Triples. Since the Triple Toe is in fact a difficult jump for her, it's likely that she would attempt 2 Lutzes and 2 Flips and leave out the Triple Toe altogether if there wasn't a rule preventing it...it's the EXACT problem I've been talking about. Skaters only focusing on trying to repeat the "most difficult" Triples twice because they are worth the most points, while completely ignoring trying to train other Triple jumps.
Yes it is. Why do you think the Zayak rule was instituted in the first place? People were thinking "wow, we can't just let Figure Skating become about repeating the same Triple jump over and over and over." My rule is just a slightly further extension of why the Zayak rule was created in the first place. It's simply more desirable to only see 1 repeat of the 3Axel or 3Lutz or 3Flip in a female program.
Your logic here isn't sound. Every skater during Elaine Zayak's time had the same opportunity to try and do a ton of Triple Toeloops as well. Nobody was as good at doing that one specific jump as she was, though. She DID have an unfair advantage over other competitors and the issue of females repeating the Triple Lutz + Triple Flip is a similar situation. Why should a female who is capable of doing all 5 Triples receive less points for a 6-Triple program that displays all of the different techniques in comparison to a 6-Triple program from someone who isn't able to do the Loop, Salchow, or Toeloop very consistently and, instead of having to deal with that problem, simply repeated the Lutz + Flip twice?
That's what's happening. Skaters are getting more points for doing something repetitive, while leaving out other types of jumps. Do you also disagree with the new rule that only allows 2 Double Axels in a program? I certainly don't.