Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Thoughts, Musings and Predictions for the GPF

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,609

    Thoughts, Musings and Predictions for the GPF

    Dance
    At NHK, janetfan complained that ice dance didn’t have the sense of surprise that the other disciplines had. Knowing who was likely to win didn’t make it much of a contest. Looking back, we’ve had a couple upsets (C/P and B/S defeating the Kerrs and F/S respectively) and a lot of interesting stories emerging (especially from Russia, where the menagerie of talent means that anyone could emerge as the top contenders for the National title). The big story, of course, has been the rise of P/B and the difficulties D/W have had. Realistically, I think expecting people like Meryl and Charlie to just let this one go is somewhat misguided. They’ve always been driven people and insanely hard workers. Remember, they went from the closest medal loss in COP history to five straight victories. Yes, maybe they’ve bitten off more than they can chew, but let’s not throw out the baby with the bathwater here – these two programs have room to grow, and give them credit for exploring other arenas besides pure dynamic power (but I don’t think they’re getting rid of that for a second). For P/B fans, these past two seasons have been rather agonizing. Narrowly missing out on the Euros podium (2009 and 2010), then seeing their early season scores diminish with the return of Delobel/Schoenfelder, and then winning the FD at worlds but being too far behind to medal. You’ve gotta look at this season as a benediction for them. The other two top European teams struggling with content and injury, posting scores that yes – can challenge D/W for those titles. Credit to their hard work as well– they went to those early competitions and got the feedback they needed, and regardless of my feelings, they have two largely acclaimed programs. So clearly, these are the top two

    Then you’ve got the next two. Two tales here. C/P went from Olympics to Worlds with one goal and that was to improve massively over their skaters in Vancouver. They succeeded. B/S, on the other hand, didn’t improve nearly to the same degree from those two competitions, seeing a smaller rise. C/P knew they were the second Canadian team heading into this season, regardless of whether V/M competed (aka, their number one position has to be in asterixed). B/S have no idea how the politicking will play out. But both have come first and second in their two events. Both defeated top teams to do so. And both have posted scores that come perilously close to the podium, and to each other. I thought we’d have another USA vs Canada battle with C/P and Samuelson/Bates, but with Worlds and the subsequent injury, I think S/B have been displaced by B/S. C/P’s situation reminds me of Khoklova/Novitski in 2008 – they were able to take advantage of retirements, injuries, mistakes and a local vacuum to sneak through to bronze at worlds. I’d hesitate in drawing major conclusions (after all, F/S could come back strong), but it’s worth noting.

    If one of the above err, I think these next two could come through. Weaver/Poje need to give a performance that definitively states that they shouldn’t be shunted aside. Time and time again in the past, they’ve just barely hung on (SC 2009) or just barely missed (Nationals 2010). They have a raggedness that makes it difficult for judges to give them the PCS or GOEs many want to see. Hoffman/Zavosin are definitely right-place/right-time, like C/P last season. Anything higher than sixth place would be a huge thing for them, and put in play the idea that top five at Euros is a plausible goal.

    1. Davis/White (will win SD on the strength of PCS and good GOES; will win F/D in both)
    2. Pechalat/Bourzat (Win TES in the SD, second on everything else)
    3. Crone/Poirier (Good GOES will give them the bronze, base value and PCS will be too close for comfort)
    4. Bobrova/Soloviev
    5. Weaver/Poje (cannot make any errors or the judges will hammer them for it)
    6. Hoffman/Zavosin (they just want two good dances to reaffirm their place as a top ten team)

    (writing up the rest now)

  2. #2
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,703
    I wonder how far Tomas Verner's "regress for success" strategy and copying of the Olympic champions jump layout will serve him here! Last year the winner was quadless and none of the medalists did quads but it seems this year is not so ultra ultra conservative because 1-it is not the Olympic year and 2-the rule changes. Then you also have Amodio quadless but that is not a "regress for success" strategy because he has rarely ever done quads at all. Will they be five and six? Are they both hoping for mistakes so their ultra-conservatism pays off like it did last season in the Olympics? You can't write off the quadless though!

    Will Chan have both a quad and his triple axel? Hopefully Takahashi does not go from first in the short to fifth in the long again! Will it be all Japanese with Takahashi-Kozuka-Oda all winning medals?

  3. #3
    Custom Title Joesitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    20,185
    If I understand that Skating Skills is a test of on ice turns, stroking, and speed, then I think Chan has these requirements. However, I believe Skating Skills as such are a Technical test, and also deserve a credit in the PC scores since there are no plus GoEs.

    Falls for me, show poor skating skills and I can not change that look. It does not mean a skater can or can not do a program without Falls, but in the competition he/she did . Figure Skating has far too much pampering in the partial credit scheme to add a meaningles automatic deduction of 1 point as a penalty.

  4. #4
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    675
    Quote Originally Posted by gmyers View Post
    Will Chan have both a quad and his triple axel? Hopefully Takahashi does not go from first in the short to fifth in the long again! Will it be all Japanese with Takahashi-Kozuka-Oda all winning medals?
    I hope not. Taka-Dai-Oda sweaping the podium will put too much pressure for themself, and the expectation from the fans and Japanese media will be too much for them in Tokyo world. I think 2 out of 3 is reasonable and at least one person will push harder them the rest.

  5. #5
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    15,948
    IP, interesting post.

    One correction: D&W won the FD at Worlds 2010. V&M were second. P&B were third over F&S, but slipped to fourth, based on their poorer showing in that part of the competition.

    And another thought. Especially in the SD, the technical committees have been more variable than in the past, particularly on calling the GW segments. TEB was particularly generous. I am going here not so much that P&B got a level 4 on the second GW segment (something that no team got in any previous GP event, including them), but that Chock & Zuerlein also scored two level 4 GW segments, and so did Cannuscio & Lorello who had two Level 1's at Cup of China. Granted C&L and C&Z improved, but not that much, on their cascade in the 2nd segment.

    So it depends on which panel arrives at the GPF: if it's the April Sargent panel from TEB, both D&W and P&B will get level 4 for both GW segments. If it's the stingy panel from CoC, P&B and D&W will both get some hit on segment 2.

    The NHK panel was stingy on the GW, but generous on the midline step. D&W got level 4 on it.

    I would make no predictions on the SD tech scores-and have been unwilling to make any such predictions all season.

    D&W are markedly faster than P&B, even today. Since you haven't seen them head to head, and since D&W have been a little slower than last year due to the importance of getting the levels in the SD GW segments, and due to the close holds and transitions of their tango FD, that hasn't been as evident, but I expect D&W to be more in shape at the GPF, for sure.

  6. #6
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,609
    doris, I'm not sure what you're correcting. This comment here

    Remember, they went from the closest medal loss in COP history to five straight victories.

    Was in reference to their Worlds 09 loss, where they lost the bronze medal by 0.04 points. THe five victories were Nebelhorn, CoR, NHK, GPF and Nationals.

  7. #7
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,609
    Nevermind, I see it now. I was grouping the European teams at World separately from the Canton quartet. My bad

    Ladies
    Oh, woe is this field! A lack of participants (Rochette, Kim, Lepisto, Meier), weakness in many of the top skaters, boring programs, injuries... the spectrum of disappointment. Very few skaters look like they want to be out there. For all her raggedness and junior persona, Murakami looks like she’s having a ball on the ice, and that’s gotta be a boon for her, but overall, this field is extremely disappointing. On the other hand, there’s really no set narrative for who could win here. In fact, the exciting this about this group is that anyone can pull it off.

    1. Miki Ando: Smart money’s on her, and for good reason. She’s won both her events (no one else has). She’s a stalwart. She did well in the last post-Olympic season, and she also came back from a disappointing 2008 season as well. I don’t really want her to win, but I think she’s got it in the bag.
    2. Alissa Czisny: My gut feeling. I could be wrong, but I’ll be wrong gloriously (as Czisny can be). Okay, the short version is that the new rules somewhat help her. The highest GOE-earning element of the season is her spiral sequence. I think she’ll benefit from the limitations of a couple of skaters and sneak through with a medal. But mainly because I feel like predicting it.
    3. Akiko Suzuki: She’s gotta go for it, and I think she can.
    4. Racheal Flatt: Injury leading to URs, and with her big weapon with the jumps gone, she doesn’t have a whole hell of a lot to fall back on. Shame, because I’m still rather rooting for her.
    5. Kanako Murakami: She knows this is her first shot to guarantee herself a spot on the Worlds team, and I think that’ll get to her.
    6. Carolina Kostner: Her technical limitations mean she’s last. If she’s attempting the harder jumps now, I think she’ll revert back to form and make too many mistakes.
    Last edited by ImaginaryPogue; 11-29-2010 at 11:54 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •