The MEN (also worth getting excited about). | Page 2 | Golden Skate

The MEN (also worth getting excited about).

gmyers

Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Petrenko had mistakes but so did Wylie. He had little flaws on a lot of the jumps he did. I think that is why some judges could put him 5th. The Japanee and Italian judges had him third. You see a lot of the judges were working for their skaters. The Czech judge placed him fifth because of Barna and the Canadian judge was Wylie, Browning, Petrenko. The ex soviet judge was nicer than the Czech judge and placed Wylie 4th. I was prepared to see a great program but there were flaws all over. Much better performance in a free skate than Hamilton gave in 1984 but not as good as Boitano's in 88-which amazingly is still the abolute Gold Standard (no pun intended) of American Mens performances at an Olympics!!! When will America produce someone as good as Boitano?!?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
The Czech judges placed him fifth because of Barna and the Canadian judge was Wylie, Browning, Petrenko. The ex soviet judge was nice than the Czech judge and placed Wylie 4th.

This is quite depressing, actually. What a bunch of crooks.

This was the same Olympics that featured the Yuri Balkov - Jean Senft affair
 
Joined
Jul 11, 2003
As I said above the competition was during Soviet times. How many Russian skaters of today can compare with the results of the Soviets during that era?
 

gmyers

Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Are you saying 1992 was Soviet Times because of the Unified team? When did Soviet times end in your view? 1994 because there was no Unified team anymore? Right now it is a fact that many judges from ex-soviet countries live in Russia-and maybe some from Eastern Europe too! Wylie was just so surprising and out of nowhere and he wouldn't win even now!
 

Tonichelle

Idita-Rock-n-Roll
Record Breaker
Joined
Jun 27, 2003
In his pro skating, Viktor used gimmick after gimmic and never did a serious skate as a pro.

actually he did have a few. He's just remembered more for his more humorous programs.

and Paul gets "Paul Who?" just as often as Viktor. When I heard him speak in 2006 the people around me thought he was Brian Boitano :laugh:
 
Last edited:

gkelly

Record Breaker
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
This [1992] was the same Olympics that featured the Yuri Balkov - Jean Senft affair [1998]

No it wasn't.

actually he did have a few. He's just remembered more for his more humorous programs.

For example:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czp9uOf_fPc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MnSGPdgrms
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-2YJ0wlQwQ

Looks like for pro competitions he would choose a more serious program for the "technical" portion and more lighthearted for the "artistic" portion.
 
Joined
Jul 11, 2003
Back on Topic

There will be, imho, and upset in Men's competition. (probably Ladies too). How will the Select Committee handle it?
 

mskater93

Record Breaker
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Back on Topic

There will be, imho, and upset in Men's competition. (probably Ladies too). How will the Select Committee handle it?

Pick the top 2 or top 3 depending on if it's ladies or men...

unless they are ineligible for some reason (age)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 11, 2003
Pick the top 2 or top 3 depending on if it's ladies or men...

unless they are ineligible for some reason (age)
Since they have an official right to select the World Team and they automatically select the Nats results, there is no need to have a Select Committee except for a non top skater who is seriously injured but expected to survive in six weeks with or without practice.

Should not an Orthopedist be part of that Committee? I think Kwan had a doctor on call who said she could skate and the Oly practice session proved that her private audition with the Committee was wrong as was her doctor. No?
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Should not an Orthopedist be part of that Committee? I think Kwan had a doctor on call who said she could skate and the Oly practice session proved that her private audition with the Committee was wrong as was her doctor. No?

Yes, the Committee was wrong.
 

Sylvia

Record Breaker
Joined
Aug 25, 2003
If people really want to rehash what happened in 2006 re. Kwan, can a separate thread be started elsewhere? (From what I recall, the 2? journalists present seemed to indicate that Kwan may have skated well enough in that private monitoring session to justify the committee's decision to send her to Torino.)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
From what I recall, the 2? journalists present seemed to indicate that Kwan may have skated well enough in that private monitoring session to justify the committee's decision to send her to Torino.

Well, it's always easy to see what to do after the fact. Now we know that Michelle was never in any shape to skate competitively, no matter that she managed to bite back the pain and do a double Axel or whatever in her test skate.

So, yes, in retrospect the Committee made a mistake. But at the time, I agreed with the Committee. In the first place, this was Michelle Kwan. The same Mivchelle kwan who carried U.S. figure skating on her back for ten years. If Michelle wants to go to Torino, Michelle goes to Torino. :laugh:

Secondly, I think the USFSA was under a certain amount of pressure from NBC. I remenber the interview Sasha Cohen did with Katy Curic, in which all Curic wanted to talk about was Michelle Kwan, and Sasha was like, what am I, chopped liver?

Well, yes. In terms of NBC's hyping the Olympics, everyone else except Michelle was chopped liver.

So it all worked out for the best after all. Michelle put in a token appearance for the TV cameras and Emily Hughes (who knew enough about the situation to keep on training) got the Olympic experience that she earned.
 

Tonichelle

Idita-Rock-n-Roll
Record Breaker
Joined
Jun 27, 2003
Well, it's always easy to see what to do after the fact. Now we know that Michelle was never in any shape to skate competitively, no matter that she managed to bite back the pain and do a double Axel or whatever in her test skate.

*I* said it at the time that she wasn't ready... but everyone just chalked it up to me being a nonfan lol
 

gmyers

Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
The Kwan example is like the only one I can ever think of (except also the Kerrigan situation) in which someone who did not participate in nationals was sent somewhere-worlds or Olympics. It's always the top 2 or 3 finishers depending on spots and who are age eligible of course. Nagasu was too young to be sent one year. I also am reading Johnny Weirs book and he states without names that should have been sent instead of Mroz in 2009 because he was a first year senior (when many are still called juniors!) - and I guess Ryan Bradley as well as he was 4th but whatever.
 

Tonichelle

Idita-Rock-n-Roll
Record Breaker
Joined
Jun 27, 2003
The Kwan example is like the only one I can ever think of (except also the Kerrigan situation) in which someone who did not participate in nationals was sent somewhere-worlds or Olympics. It's always the top 2 or 3 finishers depending on spots and who are age eligible of course. Nagasu was too young to be sent one year. I also am reading Johnny Weirs book and he states without names that should have been sent instead of Mroz in 2009 because he was a first year senior (when many are still called juniors!) - and I guess Ryan Bradley as well as he was 4th but whatever.

IMO the Kerrigan going to the Olys without nationals was fair, MK not so much. They were riding on the hope of ratings more than anything else, she was so not ready to compete and everyone knew it.
 
Joined
Jul 11, 2003
*I* said it at the time that she wasn't ready... but everyone just chalked it up to me being a nonfan lol
I said she wasn't ready since 2004 when she began to tweek new programs by leaving out elements which would harm her injured back. The made lots of money, though, and it paid for Danny's rink.
 
Top