Isnt Reynolds young? And still lands it sometimes? I think he should keep trying, it is an important jump. Lambiel first of all had the 3axel before he paused in 2008, sometimes it wasnt there but he hadnt abandoned it. And it was not like he left it out in his comeback afterwards for no reason. It was clear he coudlnt even rotate it.
But he could afford to take it off because of a list of things that Reynolds doenst have.
I wanted to reply yesterday to Nadine and I postponed it for today, so I am glad I am seeing your reply here. I completely disagree with the idea that Reynolds should take out his 3a, especially from his SP.
It would bring his base mark way down, leaving him with 2 very high risk elements which he would need to nail and we have seen how consistent he is (NOT) on those. He often underrotates at least one and the chances to miss at least one are quite high. And yes, Lambiel could afford to drop his 3a, as he was the BEST as far as spins and one of the best in artistry, while Kevin is work in progress there and he probably never come anywhere close to Lambiel in spins and footwork.
In the LP, there is a way to compensate a missing triple axel, with a combo like Sawyer does for example late in his LP (2a/2t/2l) or a 2a/3t, but in the SP there will be no room for error as far as succeding on the two other quad jumps.