she'll win, too... oy. idiots always strike it rich these days.
She was bitter nobody came to help her or ask if she was okay, but then she also said she hoped nobody saw her fall in. What a contradiction.
There didn't seem to be many people around her & she didn't look as tho she needed any help getting out of the water. Her own fault.
This morning on Good Morning America they said that she had a nice long criminal record. Personally, I think it's funny!! She walked right into that fountain.
I am sick of people playing the victim and then trying to profit off it. Fox News ripped a hole into her over it.
They would. But they wouldn't be right, IMO. If someone can take a picture of you making an *** of yourself, and then publishes it without your permission, then they deserve to pay you a piece of the profits, at the very least. It doesn't matter if you were stupid or did something wrong earlier in your life. If you read the posting agreement on youtube that you sign before they put ads on your vid, you signed that you had the permission of all the people in the vids, owned all rights to any music, etc. So I think the vid poster is caught dead to rights.
^ I don't agree. No one can tell from the video who the person is. If she did not want to be embarrassed all she had to do was nothing.
Instead she went on national TV and said, yup, that's me, don't I look like an idiot for not looking where I was going?
The other thing is, according to the television coverage she is suing the mall because "she might have been hurt and the security guard didn't help her."
I think the guard has an adequate reply, if she had been hurt I would have helped her. As it was, she required no help from mall security personnel.
I don't think she has a case against the mall; the case is against the youtuber, because they signed an agreement that they lied on. They did not have her agreement, and they said they did. The cause of action would be only partially for her embarassment; it would also be for a share of the profits. And in fact, the news outlets that ran this "story" also without her permission, relied on the youtuber to have had her agreement, and he didn't have it.
You are simply not allowed to put ordinary people on youtube or in the papers or on TV without their OK. That's why they give you a release to sign before they film you.
It doesn't matter whether you can tell who it is or not. No release, you're in doo doo-however the amount of damage in this case is debatable. She's certainly entitled to the ad proceeds of the viral video. Maybe triple them because of the lying on the youtube form.
Youtubers, being amateurs, often regard that check box as a formality, but it isn't. And they check it twice; once at upload, and once when ads are put on the vid.
Which is why I don't have ads on any of my skating videos
actually the law is clear on this matter. if it's a public place, it doesn't matter, it's free use... I, as a photographer, do not need your permission ot publish or sell a photo of you in it if it's a public location. I would do it out of courtesy, but the law is on my side.
I have many photos of people from Iditarod and what not (not the mushers/handlers/partcipants just the onlookers) that I can publish without permission of any sort, teh same applies to stupid mall lady.
I wonder what the legal situation is in England where there is a cottage industry of sneaking up on celebrities and snapping unflattering and embarrassing pictures to sell to the tabloids.
There's more to the story: she says on the video that she and the lawyer believe a security official allowed a friend to record it with his/her cell phone and that person uploaded it to YouTube. If she can prove that the video(s) came from the Mall's security video system, then she probably has a case for a lawsuit against the Mall. One of the camera angles (showing the escalator and the janitor) does look like security camera footage.
I agree that she should have just kept her mouth shut, but she says that she's a mall employee. The video was probably being passed via cell phones and she heard about it through the grapevine, which is why she called security and asked for them to be discreet. It was already too late. She was bound to be recognized, especially after interacting with a nearby store manager.
The mall must agree with her because the security guard who took the cell phone video form the monitor has since been fired....that is a big no-no!
I do think that lady was right in once sense...if that were an old person or a child who happen to lose their balance, would they not help? Would they still be laughing? Sure, she was texting and even admitted she was stupid but that doesn't mean she didn't get hurt and making sure she was okay should have been a priority to them. Not to mention the mess she created could have been a safety hazard to others.
Karma is a 'you know what'!!!!