Page 16 of 70 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 66 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 240 of 1044

Thread: Japanese Earthquake, Tsunami, and Nuclear Reactors

  1. #226
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    6,649
    You know that I'm following with interest, Doris! I'm happy to have your expertise available. If you ever start getting tired of doing this, I'll understand, of course. This is a grueling event, never seeming to resolve itself, continuing to endanger people. At some point, if you face burnout, feel free to bow out. Until then, your reports are making it easier for me both to process the crisis and to keep the people of that region in my thoughts.

    They said today that the workers in the facility are "bathing" with wipes and sleeping on mats on the floor, and they're eating only twice a day, but their morale is good. People like that ought to be thought of regularly, and your posts are helping me keep them front and center.

  2. #227
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    11,538
    They are remarkable people. I hate to hear them talked down, as I have heard from time to time on US media. & They have done remarkable things.

    And we should also think of the crews of the 13 fire engines who have been at Daiichi through most of this crisis.

  3. #228
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    2,787
    Doris...you're doing an incredible job of finding information and reports. Please continue as I'm learning a lot. It's nice to have someone with a science-oriented background who has the time to ferret out all these reports and post the fact from the fiction...and do it without sensationalism, lol.

    The one problem I have with the reports from TEPCO is their previous background for covering up what has gone on in the past with their reactor sites; they don't have the greatest reputation for truthfulness. It's kind of hard to believe they are providing the whole truth now. In my readings around the Internet I put far more stock in what the American and French nuclear experts are saying about the situation at the Fukushima plant than I do about what the Japanese are dissemenating.

  4. #229
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    11,538
    Blue Bead, Thanks for reading!

    It depends on what you call an expert. If you call American experts the people at NRC and NEI, whom I have been quoting liberally, I have a great deal of value for what they say (and most because I am sure that I am not getting a "lost in translation" effect). And if the French experts are from Areva, then they are truly experts indeed. And the IAEA people are very reliable.

    However if you're talking about people from the "Union of Concerned Scientists," which you too can join if you send them the yearly dues, since they don't check whether you are a scientist or not, then no. All too many people have been paraded across the TV screen here in the US, and introduced as experts, who made false factual and false scientific claims during this incident. Reporting has been particularly bad in New York, and particularly about Indian Point. Indian Point has two PWR reactors, not BWR as in Daiichi, and its spent fuel pool is in the reactor building which used to house Unit 1. It has no rooftop spent fuel pools, but you'd think it was identical to Daiichi. The same for Millstone in CT-it has two PWR reactors.

    I did not know that TEPCO has a history of hiding stuff.

    But the important thing is to read all their reports. The initial reports always seem to contain the 'bad' stuff. (based on this incident and the situation at Daini) It's the later ones, where it is rephrased, or where it might disappear while they are trying to figure out what went wrong.

  5. #230
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    11,538
    mot, I read the stuff on Monju, and it is not a commercial reactor. It is an experimental fast breeder reactor, and is sodium cooled. I have always had my doubts about cooling stuff with an inherently corrosive substance that explodes into flames on contract with air or water. I am assuming that this article is correct, and it was restarted last May.

    http://www.japantoday.com/category/t...start-on-may-6

    TSURUGA —
    The Japan Atomic Energy Agency said Friday it will restart the prototype fast-breeder reactor Monju on May 6 after more than 14 years of suspension, after getting the green light Wednesday from local governments.

    The reactor, located in Tsuruga, Fukui Prefecture, was suspended in December 1995 due to a sodium coolant leak and a resultant fire there. The resumption has since been postponed several times because of delays in repairs. Although the Monju reactor suffered a temporary glitch in a coolant leakage sensor Monday, the government-affiliated agency said it should be able to clarify the cause.

    Unlike regular light-water reactors that run on uranium, this reactor uses an oxide mix of plutonium and uranium and is designed to generate more plutonium than it burns.
    I can understand why people would have concerns about it, since it has such a troubled past.

    Fortunately, it was not in the area most affected by the earthquake.

    http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/...ow/7798202.cms

    India has been in the forefront of fast breeder reactor construction, and they are having doubts about the sodium cooling as well, but are pushing ahead, since it allows them to use their huge resource of thorium.

    If I lived near the Monju plant, I'd want to see some presentation of their safety procedures and backup plans. As the Indian article points out, you can't dump seawater on a sodium-cooled fast breeder reactor in the case of an accident.

  6. #231
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    11,538

    NEI 6:30 PM March 29th Report.

    I was exhausted yesterday, and did not do a late night report, so I missed this NEI update. I think though, that I covered all the stuff in here:

    UPDATE AS OF 6:30 P.M. EDT, TUESDAY, MARCH 29:
    Tokyo Electric Power Co. said that cooling water is being added to the spent storage fuel pools at reactors 2 and 3. Reactor 2 was using a temporary motor-driven pump and reactor 3 was using a truck to pump the freshwater into the fuel storage pools. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said that plans are being made to begin pumping freshwater into the fuel storage pool at reactor 4 starting today.

    IAEA said that 63 food samples taken March 24-29 in eight prefectures (Chiba, Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Miyagi, Niigata, Tochigi and Yamagata) were below regulatory limits set by the Japanese government for iodine-131, cesium-134 and cesium-137.

    New analyses of seawater about 1,000 feet from the discharge point of reactors 1 through 4 show "a significant decrease" in radiation levels from March 26, IAEA said.

    Readings for iodine-131 went from 2,000,000 picocuries (1 picocurie is one-trillionth of a curie) per liter on March 26 to 297,300 picocuries per liter on March 27. Readings for cesium-137 went from 324,324 picocuries per liter on March 26 to 51,351 picocuries per liter on March 27. IAEA said that radiation readings in seawater "will be quite variable in the near future depending on water discharge levels."

    Japan's National Research Institute of Fishery Science has analyzed five fish samples from the port of Choshi in Chiba prefecture and found concentrations in the fish to be "far below any concern for fish consumption." Four of five samples showed cesium-137 concentrations below the limit of detection. In the remaining sample, cesium-137 was found to be slightly above detectable levels.

    IAEA said the situation was evolving, but that concentrations of radionuclides in seawater would soon drop to lower values by dilution and that the levels in marine food would most likely not reach levels above regulatory limits set for consumption.

    In the United States, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's daily data summary from its RadNet radiation air monitors across the United States show typical fluctuations in background radiation levels as of 8:30 A.M. EDT. "The levels detected are far below levels of concern," EPA said

  7. #232
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    11,538

    March 30th 5:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time for Me

    Nothing new from IAEA yet.

    I read through TEPCO's morning report on all reactor facilities; nothing new there.

    Monitoring:

    Daina March 30th, 2011, 9 AM Japanese Time; 6.4 MicroSieverts per hour
    Daiichi March 30th West Gate Gamma Rays 109.3 microSieverts per hour, wind in the east, slowly decreasing
    Daiichi March 30th Main Gate Dose: 169 microSieverts/hour
    Daiichi March 30th Main Building Dose: 1.05 milliSieverts/hour (down since yesterday)
    Daiichi March 30th West Gate Dose: 78 microSieverts/hour (down since yesterday)

    TEPCO reported the analysis of the water found in the pipe trench at Unit 1. They have not yet received the analysis of the water in the trenches at Units 2 and Unit 4 (Unit 3's trench is under debris).
    http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp...s/110330e2.pdf

    It contained
    Iodine 131, 132
    Cesium 134, 136, 137
    Tc 99m (Technetium)
    Nb 95 (Niobium)
    Ru 106 (Ruthenium)
    Ag 110 m (Silver)
    La (Lanthanum)
    Te 129 & 129m (Tellurium)

    The largest amount was Iodine 131 with 5.4 Becquerels/cubic centimeter. While there are some odd isotopes in here, the concentration is not that high (less than some of the Iodine 131 measurements at the discharge canal).

    There is nothing much new in the JAIF reports.
    Lowering the amount of water injected into Units 2 and Units 3 has not changed the stability of those reactors. At Unit 1, the temperature and pressure have risen a bit, and TEPCO may need to up the amount of water injection there at some point.

    The more I think about it, the more I wonder whether the reason TEPCO called in Areva for aid is to help get rid of the total mess that has to be the spent fuel pools in Units 3 and Unit4, and to help deal with site remediation in general.
    Last edited by dorispulaski; 03-30-2011 at 10:41 AM.

  8. #233
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    11,538

    Power Panel Smoking in Turbine Building March 30th

    When you are returning to normal electrical power in a building that has suffered an earthquake, a tsunami, and explosions, you will have wiring breaks and problems. So you unplug the power

    On approximately 5:56 pm, March 30th 2011, TEPCO employee discovered smoke generation from power panel (*)at the turbine building Unit 1 (Reactor cold shutdown). On 5:57 pm, March 30th 2011, TEPCO immediately reported this incident to the fire department.

    Subsequently the fire department consisting of TEPCO employee inspected the area. On approximately 6:13 pm, March 30th 2011,we confirmed the smoke generation stopped after interrupt electrical supply to the power panel.

    From now, the fire department will conduct inspection around the area.

    TEPCO will also conduct an investigation into a cause in detail. This incident will not cause any effect of radiation externally. (Previously announced on March 30th, 2011)

    On 7:15 pm, March 30th 2011, the fire department made a judgmental decision that this incident was caused fault of the power panel, they found no signs of fire.

    (*) power panel: power supply board to supply electricity to the motor of a drawing water pump to the outdoor duct.
    Last edited by dorispulaski; 03-30-2011 at 09:52 AM.

  9. #234
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    11,538
    http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp.../110330e13.pdf

    Seawater concentration is up to about 100 Becquerels per cubic centimeter at the north discharge canal.

    Values at Daina are steady.

    It is important to remember that 3000x zero is still zero. 3000x almost zero is very small, but a significant difference. Leakage is still going on, but with all that contaminated water, not a surprise.

    Air:
    West Gate Gamma radiation
    Daiichi 9PM March 30th 102.8 MicroSieverts/hour (down)
    Daini 9 pm March 30th 5.8 MicroSieverts/hour (down)
    Daiichi Radiation dose measurements:

    Main Building 1.0 milliSieverts/hour at 9 PM March 30th (Down again)
    West Gate 72 microSieverts/hour at 9 PM March 30th (Down again)
    Main Gate 156 microSieverts/hour at 9 PM March 30th (Down again)

    NOTE: Back on March 13th, Daini was 0.037 microSieverts/hour, so we have quite a ways yet to drop, but the trend is encouraging.

    TEPCO Status 9PM March 30th

    Today's work for cooling the spent fuel pools
    - From 9:25 am, freshwater injection to Unit 2 was conducted by a temporary motor driven pump. But, because of the malfunction of that pump at 9:45 am, we decided to switch to the fire fighting pump. At 0:30 pm, we switched to use the fire pump. At 0:47 pm and 1:10 pm, because we find tear in a part of hose we prepare to restart freshwater injection.
    - At 2:04 pm, we conducted spray water to Unit 4 by a concrete pumping vehicle.
    Most of the activity has to be going on to track down the source of the water, and blocking it, and getting rid of the contaminated water (not easy).

    On the morning news, they said, an oil tanker had been considered. This might work, but has drawbacks as to what you do with the tanker.
    Last edited by dorispulaski; 03-30-2011 at 10:47 AM.

  10. #235
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    11,538
    English translation by JAIF of the 9 PM March 30th NHK news

    Today’s NHK news regarding status of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station as of 21:00 on March 30
    ●Kaieda urges safety steps at other nuclear plants
    Japan's industry minister has urged power companies across the country to secure emergency energy sources for their nuclear power stations. Banri Kaieda told reporters on Wednesday that the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi plant was due to a failure to secure emergency electricity and a loss of cooling systems at the reactors. Kaieda urged utility companies to secure mobile generators as a source of emergency power that can safely cool nuclear reactors, and to ensure water-supply routes for fire engines. He demanded that the companies confirm emergency steps and conduct drills within a month, or stop operating their nuclear power plants. Kaieda added that putting an immediate end to operations at nuclear power plants is out of the question, because Japan relies on them for about 30 percent of its electricity. NHK has learned that 90 percent of the 15 nuclear power stations nationwide, excluding the 2 quake-hit plants in Fukushima, have decided to introduce new emergency power generators, including mobile generators. Some utilities have already conducted simulations for cooling procedures based on a scenario in which emergency generators have failed to work at their nuclear reactors.
    Wednesday, March 30, 2011 16:57 +0900 (JST)


    ●TEPCO halts work to remove radioactive water
    The operator of the troubled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant has suspended work to move highly radioactive water from the basement of the turbine building into the turbine condenser at the No. 1 reactor. Tokyo Electric Power Company suspended the operation on Tuesday morning after the condenser became full of water. The work began on Thursday after water in the basement of the turbine building was found to contain radiation about 10,000 times higher than would normally be found inside an operating nuclear reactor. The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency says the water is now about 20 centimeters deep, half the initial level. TEPCO is studying a plan to move water from a tunnel outside the turbine building into an on-site waste disposal facility with a capacity of more than 25,000 tons. The water contains radioactive substances, and its level is only 10 centimeters below the top of the tunnel. TEPCO also planned to move highly radioactive water from the basements of the turbine buildings of the No. 2 and No. 3 reactors into turbine condensers with a capacity of 3,000 tons each. But both condensers turned out to be full. Plant workers are now using pumps that can draw 10 to 25 tons of water per hour to move water from the condensers' storage tanks into other tanks. They then hope to move water inside the condensers into the storage tanks and fill the condensers with the highly radioactive water from the basements.


    Wednesday, March 30, 2011 16:37 +0900 (JST)
    ●Air may be leaking from reactors No. 2 and 3
    Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency says air may be leaking from the No 2 and No 3 reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant. The agency was responding at a news conference on Wednesday to speculation that low pressure inside the 2 reactors was due to possible damage to the reactors' pressure vessels. It said some of their data show pressure is low, but there is no indication of large cracks or holes in the reactor vessels. The agency said fluctuations in temperature and pressure are highly likely to have weakened valves, pipes and openings under the reactors where the control rods are inserted.Wednesday, March 30, 2011 15:15 +0900 (JST)

    ●Radioactive elements in No.1 reactor tunnel
    Japanese nuclear safety officials say radioactive iodine and cesium have been found in water at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant coming from a tunnel outside the turbine building of the No.1 reactor. The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency says the levels of radioactive substances detected are low, at one-to-ten percent of those occurring in an operating nuclear reactor. The agency says the type of radioactive substances found in the water in the tunnel indicates some relation to the contaminated water in the basement of the No.1 reactor turbine building. It says the water in the tunnel will not be released into the sea.
    Wednesday, March 30, 2011 12:57 +0900 (JST)
    ●High radiation levels in waters off Fukushima
    The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency says radioactive iodine in excess of 3,300 times the national limit was found in seawater near the troubled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant on Tuesday afternoon. This was the highest measured in waters off the plant. The level of radioactive iodine-131 found 330 meters south of a water outlet of the plant was 3,355 times regulated standards at 1:55 PM on Tuesday. The outlet is used to drain water from the plant's No. 1 to No. 4 reactors. Radioactive iodine-131 measured 50 meters north of the water outlet of the No. 5 and No. 6 reactors was 1,262 times the regulated standards at 2:10 PM on Tuesday.
    This was also the highest reading at this location. An agency official told reporters on Wednesday morning that people in a 20-kilometer radius area from the troubled plant have been ordered to evacuate and the radioactive substance will be significantly diluted in the ocean by the time people consume marine products. The official added that efforts need to be made to prevent the contaminated water from flowing into the sea. Airborne radiation levels continue to decline in most prefectures, including Fukushima and nearby Ibaraki. Municipalities measured the radiation levels between 00:00 AM and 9:00 AM on Wednesday.
    Wednesday, March 30, 2011 12:23 +0900 (JST)
    ●Aerial photos reveal Fukushima plant damage
    Aerial photographs of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant show the scope of the devastation caused by tsunami and hydrogen explosions. NHK obtained the high resolution photos taken from an unmanned plane on March 20th and 24th. An aerial survey firm in Niigata Prefecture, Air Photo Service, took them at the request of the plant's operator, Tokyo Electric Power Company. One photo shows a large hole on the roof of the turbine building of the No.3 reactor. It was apparently created when debris hit the roof in a hydrogen explosion. Part of a pipe is missing between the reactor building and an exhaust stack. Heavy oil tanks were swept away from the pier by the tsunami and drifted 150 meters westward, blocking a road for vehicles needed for restoration work. Containers and passenger cars are piled up at the foot of a hill to the west of the No.4 reactor. Another photo shows pump trucks connected by hoses in a line that stretches from the pier to the first four reactors.
    Wednesday, March 30, 2011 08:48 +0900 (JST)
    ●Radiation levels falling in waters off Fukushima
    The science ministry says levels of radiation in seawater near the crippled Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant are on the decline. The ministry has been collecting seawater samples at 4 locations 30 kilometers off the coast of Fukushima Prefecture since March 23rd. The locations were at intervals of 20 kilometers from north to south. The ministry started the research after waters near the plant's drain outlets were found to be contaminated with a high density of radioactive substances. The ministry said 1.5 to 3.9 becquerels of radioactive cesium-137 per liter were found in seawater samples taken on Sunday. The amounts represent 1,000 to 2,600 times the levels measured in the same area 2 years ago. But the current levels are only one-fifth to one-tenth of those detected on March 23rd. The density of radioactive iodine-131 is also decreasing. It now stands at 5.4 to 15 becquerels per liter. The ministry said radiation density in the seawater is higher than normal, but it is declining.
    Cesium-137 is said to remain in the environment for a longer time than other substances as it takes roughly 30 years to lose half of its radioactive intensity. The Marine Ecology Research Institute says cesium-137 will not be directly absorbed into fish through gills but some species can accumulate the element by eating plankton and smaller fish. It's believed that through this process, the density of cesium in fish can increase 10 to 100 times the level in the seawater. It usually takes some time for radioactive material to be detected in fish after it flows into the sea. In many cases, such substances are found in flatfish and Japanese seaperch 2 to 3 months after a confirmed leak into the sea. However, unlike mercury, such elements are eliminated from fish in several weeks.
    Wednesday, March 30, 2011 06:25 +0900 (JST)
    End
    Additionally, JAIF updated their status report with the following information:

    Unit 1 Pressure vessel temperature is back down to 270.1 C

    On Mar. 30th, NISA said air may be leaking from the Reactor Pressure Vessel of Unit 2 and 3 because some of their data show the pressure in the vessels is low, but there is no indication of large cracks or holes in the vessels.

    30th High level of radioactive Iodine, I-131, which is 3,355 times higher than criterion, was detected in the seawater sampled in the vicinity of the south discharge outlet of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS at 13:55, Mar. 29th.


    It sounds like there was a very localized spill at the plant very recently, given that surrounding values are getting lower. Or that someone mislabelled a water sample or misread a scale. That has happened twice before during this situation.
    Last edited by dorispulaski; 03-30-2011 at 12:47 PM.

  11. #236
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    6,649
    Gaak, this place is beginning to sound like Mordor from Lord of the Rings. And yet there are people staying there and doing their job. Unbelievably impressive.

  12. #237
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    11,538
    Here's a link to the aerial photograph NHK referred to:

    http://img.ibtimes.com/www/data/imag...erial-view.jpg

    Yes, it looks like Mordor-or the Island of the Damned.
    Last edited by dorispulaski; 03-30-2011 at 02:51 PM.

  13. #238
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    11,538

    NEI 1:30 PM Easter Daylight Time March 30th

    UPDATE AS OF 12 P.M. EDT, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 30:
    Operators of nuclear power stations in Japan have been urged to ensure their facilities have emergency power sources.

    Industry Minister Banri Kaieda Wednesday attributed the nuclear emergency in Japan to the loss of cooling systems at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the Japan Atomic Industry Forum reported. He told utility companies they should have mobile generators on hand to cool their nuclear reactors as an added safety measure.

    Kaieda said the utilities should confirm the steps they have taken and conduct drills within a month or stop operating their nuclear facilities.

    According to the NHK news service, many companies are introducing emergency power generators to their facilities. Some have conducted drills for cooling operations based on a situation in which emergency generators fail.

    At the Fukushima Daiichi site, workers continued to inject fresh water into reactors 1, 2 and 3 to keep them cool, while at the same time dealing with water that has pooled in the basements of turbine buildings and in concrete trenches near the units. As available storage space in the reactors' condensers is filled, Tokyo Electric Power Co. is looking to store the radioactive water in tanks that will be brought to the facility. TEPCO has switched to fresh water for spraying the spent fuel pools for reactors 1, 2, 3 and 4.

    All the units at Daiichi are operating on off-site electric power and work continues to connect equipment. High radiation levels and wet equipment still hampers restoration of the plants' original machinery.

    The U.S. nuclear energy industry will learn important lessons from the Fukushima Daiichi accident and "identify additional steps we can and will take to further improve safety at our nuclear plants," one of the industry's leaders told a U.S. Senate committee today.
    William Levis, president of PSEG (Pennsylvania, Electric & Gas) and a leader in the nuclear industry addressed the US Congress. His remarks can be found here:

    http://www.nei.org/newsandevents/new...ive-testifies/

    Levis described safety plans and previous efforts of the industry, and praised President Obama's quoted opinion on Daiichi & the US nuclear industry.

    There was one useful thing:

    Levis reminded senators not to extrapolate earthquake and tsunami data from one location of the world to another when evaluating natural hazards, emphasizing that the catastrophic events in Japan occurred along a “subduction zone,” the type of tectonic region that produces earthquakes of the largest magnitude. In the continental United States, the only subduction zone lies off the coast of northern California, Oregon and Washington. None of California’s four reactors are located near this subduction zone. The California Coastal Commission last week concluded that a “nuclear emergency such as is occurring in Japan is extremely unlikely at the state’s two operating nuclear power plants,” Levis said.
    Diablo Canyon and San Onofre, the two nuclear complexes in CA, each have two reactors. All four of them are PWR reactors, not BWR. Diablo Canyon's reactors are Westinghouse Four Loop systems. San Onofre's were built by Combustion Engineering. So they are not the same general design as Daiichi, nor were they built by any of the vendors who built the Daiichi reactors (GE, Toshiba & Hitachi)

    Here's a list of the US nuclear reactors, with specs:

    http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operatin...tor-units.html

  14. #239
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    11,538

    IAEA's March 30th 4:30 PM UTC

    IAEA is not reporting on the high amounts of radioactive material in the seawater at the south discharge canal. My guess is that a second sample is being taken and analyzed.


    IAEA Briefing on Fukushima Nuclear Accident (30 March 2011, 16.30 UTC)
    On Wednesday, 30 March 2011, the IAEA provided the following information on the current status of nuclear safety in Japan.
    The TV news said that TEPCO was considering spraying the entire site with some kind of fixative to keep dust down. Neither JAIF, TEPCO, IEEA, or NEI have mentioned that.


    1. Current Situation
    Overall at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, the situation remains very serious.

    With respect to the water that is present in the turbine buildings. In Unit 1, water has continued to be pumped into the condenser with 3 pumps (6.5 ton/hour each) and the water level has reduced from 40cm to 20cm. In Unit 2 from 07.45 UTC, pumping of water from the Condensate Storage Tank into the Surge Tank was started so that the that condenser can be drained to the Condensate Storage Tank and contaminated water can be pumped out from the Turbine building into the condenser. The same process of pumping the water from the Condensed Water Storage Tank into the Surge Tank was started on Unit 3 at 08.40 UTCon March 28.

    Near the Unit 3 building, 3 workers spilled water over themselves when removing a flange from seawater pipes on the residual heat removal system (RHR). After showering, contamination was not detected.

    Fresh water has been continuously injected into the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) through feed-water line at an indicated flow rate of 8.0 m3/h at Unit 1. The pumping of freshwater into the RPV has been switched from fire trucks to temporary electrical pumps with diesel generator. At Units 2 and 3 fresh water is being injected continuously through the fire extinguisher line at an indicated rate of 7 m3/h using a temporary electric pump.

    The indicated temperature at the feed water nozzle of the RPV of Unit 1 has decreased from 323 oC to 281 oC and at the bottom of RPV remained stable at 134 oC. There is a corresponding decrease in Drywell pressure. At Unit 2 the indicated temperature at the feed water nozzle of the RPV has increased from 154 oC to 177 oC and at the bottom of RPV has increased from 78 oC to 88 oC. Indicated Drywell pressure remains at atmospheric pressure. For Unit 3 the indicated temperature at the feed water nozzle of the RPV is about 75 oC and at the bottom of RPV is about 116 oC. The validity of the RPV temperature measurement at the feed water nozzle is still under investigation.

    With respect to the Spent Fuel Pools. It was planned to commence the pumping of water into the Unit 1 Spent Fuel Pool by concrete pumping truck from 29 March. Also on 29 March pumping of fresh water into the Unit 2 spent fuel pool commenced via a temporary electrical pump. The temperature of the spent fuel pool is 46o C as of 19:00 UTC 29 March. For Unit 4 it was planned to commence pumping freshwater into the spent fuel pool on March 29. The IAEA has not received information on implementation of spraying activities in units 1 and 4.

    Units 5 and 6 remain in cold shutdown


    2. Radiation Monitoring

    The majority of the recently measured radioactivity levels in drinking water are being reported below the levels established by the Japanese authorities which are 100 Bq/L of I-131 for infants; 300 Bq/L for adults and 200 Bq/L of Cs-137 for infants and adults. Previously imposed recommendations for restrictions on drinking water are being lifted in most of the affected locations. As of 28 March, recommendations for restrictions based on I-131 concentration remain in place in one village in the Fukushima prefecture. In three other locations of the Fukushima prefectures, restrictions continue to apply for infants only.

    Two IAEA teams are currently monitoring radiation levels and radioactivity in the environment in Japan. On 29 March, one team made gamma dose-rate measurements in the Tokyo region at 8 locations. Gamma-dose rates measured ranged from 0.02 to 0.19 microsievert per hour, which is within or slightly above the background.

    The second team made additional measurements at distances of 32 to 62 km, at directions North to Northwest from the Fukushima nuclear power plant. At these locations, the dose rates ranged from 0.5 to 6.8 microsievert per hour. At the same locations, results of beta-gamma contamination measurements ranged from 0.05 to 0.45 Megabecquerel per square metre.

    Based on measurements of I-131 and Cs-137 in soil, sampled from 18 to 26 March in 9 municipalities at distances of 25 to 58 km from the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant, the total deposition of iodine-131 and cesium-137 has been calculated. The results indicate a pronounced spatial variability of the total deposition of iodine-131 and cesium-137. The average total deposition determined at these locations for iodine-131 range from 0.2 to 25 Megabecquerel per square metre and for cesium-137 from 0.02-3.7 Megabecquerel per square metre. The highest values were found in a relatively small area in the Northwest from the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant. First assessment indicates that one of the IAEA operational criteria for evacuation is exceeded in Iitate village. We advised the counterpart to carefully access the situation. They indicated that they are already assessing.

    As far as food contamination is concerned, 35 samples taken from 25-29 March, and reported on 29 March, for various vegetables, fruit (strawberry), seafood, pork and unprocessed raw milk in nine prefectures (Chiba, Gunma, Ibaraki, Kanagawa, Nagano, Niigata, Saitama, Tochigi and Yamagata), stated that results for iodine-131, caesium-134 and caesium-137 were either not detected or were below the regulation values set by the Japanese authorities.

    The Joint FAO/IAEA Food Safety Assessment Team met with local government officials in Tochigi prefecture on 29th March and provided advice related to contamination of food and the environment.

    Local government officials briefed the FAO/IAEA Team on the extent of contamination in Tochigi, the principle agricultural products affected, the main production areas and production methods (greenhouses, open-air), levels of contamination found (principally in air, tap/ground water and vegetables) and imminent plans to monitor soil contamination. A field visit also took place to a spinach producer outside Utsanomiya City.

    Based on these latest discussions with the Tochigi authorities, it is apparent that the focus of the Joint FAO/IAEA mission has changed to some extent from the mechanisms of contamination to remediation strategies and techniques related to plant and animal production, food traceability and water/soil characterization.

    The FAO/IAEA team is also meeting with the local government officials in Gunma prefecture today.

    No new results from the marine monitoring stations 30 km off-shore as well as from close to the discharge, were reported since 27 March.

    One IAEA staff member of the Monaco marine laboratory will fly to Japan on 31 March in order to join the Japanese team assessing marine environment.

    The IAEA continues activities under the Joint Radiation Emergency Management Plan of the International Organisations through regular video/teleconferences. As of March 30 the WHO liaison officer is working in the IEC.

    In response to the request for data on measurement, the IEC has received information from Singapore. The Singapore Authorities have sent reports on measurements in food imported from Japan (cabbages). Some samples were over the Codex Alimentarius values recommended for international trade. In Singapore no increase in gamma dose rates have been observed and no fission products have been found in air samples.

  15. #240
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    11,538
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...72T3O920110330

    Meanwhile a delegation from Areva has arrived to offer help with containing all the contaminated water, including the head of Areva, Anne Lauvergeon.

    Edition:U.S.

    Reuters
    March 30th, 2010

    11:35am EDT
    By Sybille de la Hamaide and Mathilde Cru

    PARIS | Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:19am EDT

    PARIS (Reuters) - Areva Chief Executive Anne Lauvergeon arrived in Japan on Wednesday, broadening out a French delegation that has flown out to help Tokyo Electric Power bring its crippled Fukushima nuclear plant under control.

    The head of the French nuclear reactor maker -- one of France's most powerful female executives -- traveled to Tokyo with three French experts in radioactive water contamination.

    Two other Areva experts flew to Japan on Tuesday, after a request for help from Tokyo Electric Power (TEPCO), an Areva spokeswoman said.

    Separately, President Nicolas Sarkozy will make a flying visit to Tokyo on Thursday, the first foreign leader to arrive since a March 11 earthquake and tsunami killed more than 28,000 people and set off the world's worst atomic crisis in years.

    "At the moment the problem which worries TEPCO is water, so we are trying to see -- because they are specialists in the treatment of radioactive waste -- what they could advocate," she said. "They are looking at what aid we could bring them."

    While Sarkozy will offer France's support to the Japanese people, Lauvergeon's experience makes her well-placed to help with technical aspects of the crisis. "She knows Japan well, she knows the industry well, it is a way to answer the Japanese request for expertise," the Areva spokeswoman said.
    ...
    The French experts will be based in the Tokyo area, where TEPCPO has offices, and not at the nuclear site itself.


Page 16 of 70 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 66 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •