^ I think you can try to express the character and structure of the music itself without knowing that it came from a play about a phantom.
For instance, Take Five isn't about anything. To interpret it, just be cool.![]()
^ I think you can try to express the character and structure of the music itself without knowing that it came from a play about a phantom.
For instance, Take Five isn't about anything. To interpret it, just be cool.![]()
I have to disagree. Interpreting music alone is a part of the orchestra led by the conductor. MM's post on Take 5 is correct.
In Ballet, the City Ballet presents works where music takes the dancers. (Some are good; some are not). In Classical Ballet, there are stories to be followed. (Some are good; some are not). Pick your choice.
In Figure Skating, I would say some skaters can perform to the music alone (Mirai's Carmen) and some require a story (Kat's Carmen). Personally I prefer a skater to bring something original to the music. People have different tastes, and so do judges.
Last edited by Bluebonnet; 05-09-2011 at 10:35 AM.
Actually, I think the the interpretations in Fantasia were pretty literal. The Hippos were "day" and the Alligators were "night" (good and evil) in the Waltz of the Hours. just like in the original opera.
Both the Sorcerer's Apprentice and Night on Bald Mountain stuck quite faithfully to the script. (Although, in the poem by Goethe I think it might have been a peasant lad rather than a mouse that applied for the job of errand boy to the sorcerer.)
IIRC the mushrooms were Chinese. The Cossack dancers were thistles.![]()
http://cdn1.iofferphoto.com/img/item...1/075/8j27.jpg
THE greatest animated movie of all time! (The 1940 version, that is.)(Number two, Snow White.)
Bringing Chan into this thread along with hippos and aligators is kind of off the wall. Chan, when he is on is the present day Musical Skater. If you can't feel what he is feeling whether there is a story or not, then you may have limited tastes.
Bookmarks