- Joined
- May 15, 2009
Good point in theory, but in practice what has happened is that the world team has been selected based on increasingly controversial results in recent years. There are issues of skaters being marked much higher in certain scoring components than they would be internationally, which is fine by itself; but there have also been allegations of "favoring" certain skaters by increasing their amount of "Nationals inflation" relative to others...or "boosting" their scores regardless of performance if they had a great season prior to the event. I don't think the current method is as "objective" as some would like to think.
I tend to see more of a difference in scoring between National and International events than I do among International events. Rachel Flatt for example would NEVER get the program components she gets at Nats at ANY international event, regardless of panel.
I think what you are saying is more important than CoP boosters and many skating fans are willing to admit.
If we go back to 2010 Natls and 6.0 was in place Flatt's margin of victory would have caused a much bigger controversy.
If comparitive scores had gone up for the presentation marks fans in the arena and fans on TV would have either been bewildered, angry or had a long laughing fit at Rachael getting the same presentation marks as Mirai.
That is what happened under the CoP and of course it was inaccurate to the point it felt biased and political.
When skating de-emphasized the artistic components it also began using the components more to boost the favorites rather than judging them fairly.
Don't believe me but we have heard this from Lori and of course Joe Inman. Jenny Kirk devoted an entire blog to it.
If Rachael and Mirai had both received 5.8 for presentation at Natls the charade would have been exposed.
Casual fans don't know and most don't care about the scoring system as long a they can understand at some level what it means.
"201" and "188" did not make it clear to casual viewers that Rachael won by such a large margin because she was judged as Mirai's equal in the PCS.
US Natls in the CoP era has had contoversial scoring and caused several longtime skating fans I know to walk away.
They just don't think it matters anymore and that it is not only too political but inaccurate.
As RD implied keeping Natls as the qualifier does give US Skating a better abilty to select who they want on the Natl team more than if Intl scores were weighted more heavily and factored into the equation.
Last edited: