
Originally Posted by
jcoates
I love all the mildly dismissive assumptions that V/M will refine and improve their FD to the level of complete perfection and have done so every season the last few years; but somehow D/W will remain at the same level all season, can't possibly refine or enhance their expression to the same degree (w/ the implication that they have not refined past programs either). The expectation seems to be tied to the general consensus about their abilities, skills and potential that existed when both teams were rookies and sophomores. Everyone assumed back then that all things, being equal on a technical level, V/M would and should win out in all circumstances due to superior expression or dance quality or ability to relate to each other. That opinion was based primarily on impressions of musicality, interaction, line, posture, timing, foot position, and expression. Over time that opinion has persisted with many fans.
I wonder, however, if that is now merely a comfortable assumption that is easy to fall back on. Haven't D/W improved tremendously in some of those areas? Have they not shown that some of their own strengths can and do count just as much (speed, energy, projection out to the audience, abandon)? Samson and Delilah was much more refined by Worlds than it was at SC or CoR. Phantom was its sharpest at Worlds when a post-Oly hangover would have been perfectly understandable. Their tango last year was a constant work in progress throughout the season and even many of its detractors admitted there was much more punch to it in Moscow that at previous events. (BTW all three FDs beat VM in that segment at Worlds.) So given that track record, vastly improved PCS over the years, and the reception their FD has gotten so far, is it really fair to assume that D/W won't be able to keep pace with whatever improvements V/M will inevitably make to their program?
Bookmarks