While I can't at all explain the B&S PCS vs. the W&P PCS, perhaps someone who was there can? Were B&S faster than W&P? Than R&T? . The British Eurosport guys were watching it on TV like many of the rest of us, me included.
The R&T vs. B&S thing I can speak to:
Bobrova & Soloviev had a base score of 36.50 in the FD.
Riazanova & Tkachenko had a base score of 30.50 inf the FD.
There's 6 points right there. Furthermore, a bigger base means a bigger GOE for many of the skills.
R&T's Total Element Score: 34.79
B&S's Total Element Score: 43.52
So now we've found 8.73 of the overall difference. R&T had 3 Level 1 skills. I would think that that would not impress the judges very much when they came to give out any of the PCS components.
That said, I would have scored W&P higher in PCS than B&S, and if B&S were lower, they'd be closer to R&T than they are now.
But then, I wasn't at the rink.


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks