
Originally Posted by
DianaSelene
First of all, 4 non-fall mistakes may worse than one fall. Your argument is the falls. But that's not just it. If Chan won a competition with 2 falls only and no other mistakes that would be one thing but that is not the case.
Second, name me in his whole career: "How many competitions in his senior career did Patrick Chan win without falls (I'm not even counting competitions where he stepped out of a jump or put his hand down)?" I already count world and canadian nationals. Any more? You probably won't find that many. And let me reiterate- sometimes a bunch of mistakes are more costly than one fall. Consider the fall on the 3 lutz he had. He got -2.10. The fall on 4T-3T. He got -2.29. Together that would be -4.39. Yes, the GOEs are on jumps that have different base values but there would be a small difference if the falls were both lutzes or both 4T.
Now, his numerous mistakes. 4T (-1.86), 4T-2T (-2.43), 3A (-1.00). That is a total of -5.29. Together, these mistakes had more negative GOEs than two falls. Again, I understand that the higher value the jump, the more GOE you get, but the difference could be in a tenth maybe if all of the jumps were the same value.
I'm not arguing that Chan won with 3 falls, I'm arguing he won with 2 falls and a bunch of high costing mistakes.
Bookmarks