No, I am not because I already know the answer: Chan's falls are the most hillarious and entertaining, also they come in big numbers. Dai's, and not Dai's only, falls are much rarer. Chan follows the movement that his teacher told him to follow, with the same face expression and a little idea what the music is about. Dai has each note on the ice because he knows how to feel the music. But Aranjuez is not 'cool'. It's full of passion and sensual stuff. Unless it's the blah Aranjuez.
Wow! You amused me. Such a great work! I am too lazy to bother to count Chan's falls. They seem like come endlessly. But you did a real research that should go to some FS library records.![]()
There is no accounting in competition of the hearts but in official figure skating competitions as a sport, the X factors count for a limited percentage, directly in components of IN, P/E and maybe CH, plus whatever indirect influence in other marks.
Nobody will beat anybody automatically, especially at such level and such close rivalry. But Chan has a high chance of beating Takahashi, and has consistently done so in every competition since Worlds 2010. Takahashi's chances are much better in the SP portion and he did beat Chan by a fraction of a point in SC, the first match up this season. Then there was a close one in the LP in GPF. But Chan's higher TES content and higher consistency in execution in the LP make it extremely difficult for Takahashi to overtake him. It has to be a combination of Takahashi skating lights out, including landing his quads, and Chan blowing it. Then there are the patterns of progression to take into consideration. Chan usually gets his more and more challenging LP down pat at or after the GPF and hits his peak close to the end of the season whereas Takahashi tends to do his best at NHK and the Nationals, way before the final showdown. Hopefully he didn't peak at the SP of the Nationals this time. He has fallen 6 times in 2 competitions since this SP and 4CC won't be easy for him either with high altitude to contend with.Chan isn't going to beat Takahashi automatically at every competition.
My earlier comment about fallings referred to Chan's always quick recovery without loss of choreography, unlike many other skaters including Takahashi. I respect both skaters highly and would not be dragged into ridiculing either one with selective footages and juvenile mocking not befitting this forum. The above analysis is as objective as my knowledge allows and pertains to official competitions.
I agree with you 100%, but I was trying to answer Olympia's question "Takahashi and Chan really wring the most out of the skating possibilities--and I'm not even talking about jumps, but about how they use their whole bodies to create great shapes and positions. Why don't many ladies do this?". Few ladies have the strength to do what Pat and Dai do on ice.
Thank you. After watching them back to back, Chan's falls indeed stood out, especially his famous upturned turtle fall, forward frog fall and sidewise crab fall. The reputation and comical effect appeared so great that the judges were deduction-shy, oblivious to or unconscious of the insecure steps/edges leading to those falls.
Your conclusion contradicts your assessment.Stojko pointed out spins as ones of Chan's weakness. Apparently there is some truth in it.
My criticism of Chan's SP and his programs in general concerns his relative lack of varied speed. All his field moves are brief and uncreative, insufficient to demonstrate the true ability of keeping an extended edge. He wiggles and jiggles his body and feet all the time to change edges or generate speed or maintain balance (Worst still, his wiggling and jiggling does not always match the notes of the music). Can he produce beautiful positions on the same edge for a long time? Or will his technical ability and posture and interpretation skills be exposed as a result thereof? That is a question I always have, given that he hardly gives the audience a chance to see it.
As far as Da's SP is concerned, I appreciate his innovative, extended one-foot field move right before his camel spins. And I respect his momentary stop during his footwork to reflect the nuances of music and to showcase his ability of acceleration from zero. It is a program that demonstrates varied speed, not one-dimensional albeit fast like Chan's.
Last edited by skatinginbc; 01-27-2012 at 07:45 PM.
Last edited by Bluebonnet; 01-27-2012 at 03:26 PM.
Of course I couldn't. My criticism pertains to his lack of it. When something is absent, how do you expect me to find it? Gee, what kind of logic you are playing!
Can't he be more creative doing something like Dai's innovative field work? A brief spread eagle...hehe, so lame. Anyway, my emphasis is--to demonstrate a variety of skills. Chan hasn't proven his ability of keeping an extended edge and at the same time showcasing his interpretation of the music and good posture with his competitive programs. It is a weakness in his choreography and I wonder if it is a weakness in his skating skills as well.
Last edited by skatinginbc; 01-27-2012 at 03:48 PM.
I mean if you demand spread eagle kind of long demonstration in every program, it's not going to happen. Patrick has demonstrated extraordinary speed changing abilities in this program and his programs in general. The program has ups and downs, pulse and accelerating. It is perfectly fitting into the music and the theme.
Patrick has so many creative, original, beautiful moves in every single program of his. I'm just amazed that you could find Dai's innovative moves but not Patrick's.![]()
Last edited by Bluebonnet; 01-27-2012 at 03:53 PM.
Bookmarks