
Originally Posted by
skfan
i disagree with 4CC as a method of selecting world team members, because i don't want a best 2 out of 3 deciding who goes--it should be a test of who can handle the pressure of one competition to decide it all IMO. what is a better test of someone's competitive mettle--a competition to decide it all, single elimination, or a series of competitions all counting a little toward the total? you want tough competitors, put them through a tough test.
i don't like what canada is doing, even though i vastly prefer phaneuf to lacoste and agree phaneuf will have a better shot at making the top 10, and i understand canada wanting 2 spots in worlds i their own country, just like i understand everybody's wish to get 3 US world spots back.
if you must use 4CC to decide the world team, shouldn't gold at least earn a chance to go to 4CC by competing against the other senior ladies who are vying for the world team? look at the hot disputes in japan and canada about the make up of 4CC teams--if it's become a competition of such great importance, then shouldn't one earn the right to go there, not just be annointed at the expense of somebody else who wants to go to 4CC?
Bookmarks