LADIES LONG PROGRAM Thread
- Thread starter christinaskater
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2006
Victoria looked sooooo much better yesterday in a Latin program and a costume that didn't have a headband. : (
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2010
The ISU judges adjusted Amelie's PCS to screw with Skate Canada.
I absolutely agree with the both of you. Plus, I find Amelie this year far more aesthetically pleasing than before (minus the hair).
I agree. I had high hopes for Haruka and Bingwa (as well as the Canadian ladies of course) but they all struggled tonight.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2006
Haha, that would be funny if true.
Au contraire, Rachael Flatt has a mind of *steel*, just like Zhenya & Michelle, she skates clean (except the year she was injured) 99% of the time.
Also, she's a JOYOUS skater, no comparison at all to Lacoste.
Back to Cynthia, she's done everything SC has told her to do, that is going to Brian Orser, working on her jumps, et al, they owe her imho.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2006
It is ridiculous talk about Amelie "beating" Cynthia when it is a matter of (as Blades said) a few hundredths of a point. It's a tie, folks. They have to hold another skateoff or decide on beauty points, or who has the best coach... or send Navarro. : )
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2009
when is the decision announced ?
did SC say that regardless of any other considerations, whoever scored better at 4C would go to Worlds? or were they more vague? In other words did they leave themsleves any " wiggle room"?
Also, after we send Amelie to a hair stylist and make up artist , can we get Cynthia a new costume designer - all her costumes look alike and none of them fit - she is a big girl ( compared to the many teenie lady skaters ) and rather than compliment her strong athletic look ,the costumes she wears arent well cut or proportioned so she looks manly :scowl:- and why always the same neckline????
did SC say that regardless of any other considerations, whoever scored better at 4C would go to Worlds? or were they more vague? In other words did they leave themsleves any " wiggle room"?
Also, after we send Amelie to a hair stylist and make up artist , can we get Cynthia a new costume designer - all her costumes look alike and none of them fit - she is a big girl ( compared to the many teenie lady skaters ) and rather than compliment her strong athletic look ,the costumes she wears arent well cut or proportioned so she looks manly :scowl:- and why always the same neckline????
This is just painful to watch.Why did they bring this comp here with all the bad history about the high altitude ?
Yes, why? I'm remembering lots of oxygen masks, etc.
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
This is just painful to watch.
Don't post a lot but the whole high altitude thing is ridiculous. High altitude is essentially a fitness test....if you fail that test thats your own problem. Its an excuse and nothing more.
I really don't think altitude has anything to do with what we are seeing.
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2007
- Country
-
I always wonder if Skate Canada doesn't still have lingering thoughts that they "owe" Cynthia support since she was encouraged not to go to senior worlds oh so long ago when she first won her national title. That's the karma I still think about wrt Cynthanny.
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
Cynthia's much hyped PCS is coming down to earth in international competitions.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2009
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2006
Cynthia Phaneuf looks about 10 lbs heavier than she used to be. She needs to lose a bit. My Mom said she looks heavier than me and I weigh 140 lbs, although I know the camera adds 10 lbs.
I was too heavy to continue with figure skating, naturally, and I wasn't about to starve. lol.
I was too heavy to continue with figure skating, naturally, and I wasn't about to starve. lol.
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2011
Position After 17 Of 24
1. Amelie LACOSTE (CAN) - 147.65 (FS = 95.93 (TES: 43.84, PCS: 53.09, DED: 1.00))
2. Cynthia PHANEUF (CAN) - 147.47 (FS = 96.71 (TES: 44.83, PCS: 51.88))
3. Haruka IMAI (JPN) - 134.49 (FS = 89.30 (TES: 49.05, PCS 42.25, DED: 2.00))
4. Bingwa GENG (CHN) - 127.89 (FS = 80.91 (TES: 37.02, PCS: 45.89, DED: 2.00))
5. Victoria MUNIZ (PUR) - 117.83 (FS = 75.20 (TES: 36.36, PCS: 40.84, DED: 2.00))
6. Alexandra NAJARRO (CAN) - 117.11 (FS = 80.03 (TES: 40.29, PCS: 40.74, DED: 1.00))
7. Melinda WANG (TPE) - 103.69 (FS = 68.34 (TES: 32.15, PCS: 36.19))
8. Sandra KHOPON (THA) - 103.15 (FS = 67.57 (TES: 35.39, PCS: 32.18))
9. Qiuying ZHU (CHN) - 102.77 (FS = 66.34 (TES: 34.09, PCS: 34.25, DED: 2.00))
10. Chantelle KERRY (AUS) - 102.49 (FS = 70.21 (TES: 37.72, PCS: 32.49))
11. Mimi Tanasorn CHINDASOOK (THA) - 97.19 (FS = 59.96 (TES: 28.04, PCS: 32.92, DED: 1.00))
12. Yea-Ji YUN (KOR) - 96.85 (FS = 64.39 (TES: 33.50, PCS: 31.89, DED: 1.00))
13. Melanie SWANG (THA) - 96.16 (FS = 64.95 (TES: 36.05, PCS: 28.90))
14. Chae-Yeon SUHR (KOR) - 94.95 (FS = 58.41 (TES: 28.47, PCS: 31.94, DED: 2.00))
15. Lejeanne MARAIS (RSA) - 94.34 (FS = 62.19 (TES: 30.20, PCS: 32.07))
16. Crystal KIANG (TPE) - 93.79 (FS = 62.88 (TES: 31.61, PCS: 31.27))
17. Zhaira COSTINIANO (PHI) - 87.26 (FS = 56.93 (TES: 27.64, PCS: 30.29, DED: 1.00))
1. Amelie LACOSTE (CAN) - 147.65 (FS = 95.93 (TES: 43.84, PCS: 53.09, DED: 1.00))
2. Cynthia PHANEUF (CAN) - 147.47 (FS = 96.71 (TES: 44.83, PCS: 51.88))
3. Haruka IMAI (JPN) - 134.49 (FS = 89.30 (TES: 49.05, PCS 42.25, DED: 2.00))
4. Bingwa GENG (CHN) - 127.89 (FS = 80.91 (TES: 37.02, PCS: 45.89, DED: 2.00))
5. Victoria MUNIZ (PUR) - 117.83 (FS = 75.20 (TES: 36.36, PCS: 40.84, DED: 2.00))
6. Alexandra NAJARRO (CAN) - 117.11 (FS = 80.03 (TES: 40.29, PCS: 40.74, DED: 1.00))
7. Melinda WANG (TPE) - 103.69 (FS = 68.34 (TES: 32.15, PCS: 36.19))
8. Sandra KHOPON (THA) - 103.15 (FS = 67.57 (TES: 35.39, PCS: 32.18))
9. Qiuying ZHU (CHN) - 102.77 (FS = 66.34 (TES: 34.09, PCS: 34.25, DED: 2.00))
10. Chantelle KERRY (AUS) - 102.49 (FS = 70.21 (TES: 37.72, PCS: 32.49))
11. Mimi Tanasorn CHINDASOOK (THA) - 97.19 (FS = 59.96 (TES: 28.04, PCS: 32.92, DED: 1.00))
12. Yea-Ji YUN (KOR) - 96.85 (FS = 64.39 (TES: 33.50, PCS: 31.89, DED: 1.00))
13. Melanie SWANG (THA) - 96.16 (FS = 64.95 (TES: 36.05, PCS: 28.90))
14. Chae-Yeon SUHR (KOR) - 94.95 (FS = 58.41 (TES: 28.47, PCS: 31.94, DED: 2.00))
15. Lejeanne MARAIS (RSA) - 94.34 (FS = 62.19 (TES: 30.20, PCS: 32.07))
16. Crystal KIANG (TPE) - 93.79 (FS = 62.88 (TES: 31.61, PCS: 31.27))
17. Zhaira COSTINIANO (PHI) - 87.26 (FS = 56.93 (TES: 27.64, PCS: 30.29, DED: 1.00))
I don't always agree with COP but it's the only "objective" way of looking at results in terms of numbers. In my book, even a 0.01 difference would be sufficient to declare one skater a winner over the other.
Similar threads
