
Originally Posted by
ImaginaryPogue
Firstly, Sui/Han deserved to win. By including those high base value elements (which are actually undervaluled in pairs skating, I feel), they start with such sky high base value that it would take a poor skate from them AND a great skate from someone else to win. That didn't happen.
Secondly, that they deserved to win doesn't mean they weren't overscored, or that overscoring doesn't matter.
Here's the criteria for Skating Skills
a) Outside the elements, it's all two foot skating. Very much stroke, stroke, stroke
b) They're quick, but it's not effortless. It's the same thing Murakami struggled with and why her SS aren't as high as they could be even though she's fast, so you don't have that glide, that smoothness, that precision, that high skating skill technicians are able to get.
c) There's very little in the way of great edge control that again, we see in the top teams (not here, but in general)
So already, out of the seven criteria, they lack a strong hold with four of them. They did well in the multi-directional skating and showed a variety of speed well, and seemed pretty equal to me. To me, that's around a six. What do you think, skateflower?
Bookmarks