Here's Nathan two year ago, age 10. I take back what I just said about a double/double/double combo harming the choreography.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHimaaLOYg
Here's Nathan two year ago, age 10. I take back what I just said about a double/double/double combo harming the choreography.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHimaaLOYg
For levity and to back up fscric's point of the friendship between the two skaters we are discussing, here is a snipshot taken out of another video focusing on Rippon and Wagner.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2wyGm0Bh4c![]()
I love sequences with the half loop, they are so cool and the skaters who do them seem light on their feet. What other sequence is possible to do?
Last edited by seniorita; 02-24-2012 at 08:01 AM.
2A+1Lo+3S
2A+1Lo+2F
3T+1Lo+3S
3A+1Lo+3F
The jump after the half loop will be double or triple salchow or flip.
The first jump can be anything. The women are more likely to use a double axel or easier triple; the top men are more likely to use a harder triple.
At lower levels, the jumps will be doubles, or single axel. When I skated in the 1970s, I remember seeing single axel-half loop-double salchow from skaters around intermediate level.
Or did you mean sequences with other intervening jumps other than half loop? Those would still receive the 0.8 multiplier under the IJS rules.
I can see this happening, but unless lot's more skaters start adding more then one type of quad to their repertoire it would be the end of 4x3 and 3x3 jump combos in those Men's programs. Would have to be 4T-2T, 4T, 3A-2Lo, 3A. If that becomes the 'gold' standard, I do think we may have to start looking at changing the Zayak rule.
gkelly - Would it be possible to switch edges over in after landing a 1/2 loop and do a lutz as the 2nd jump? or would that get a SEQ call?
What would the podium results have been for men's competitions last year if zero point was given to a fallen jump? Here are the results:
2011 Worlds:
1. Patrick CHAN (1): 280.98
2. Takahiko KOZUKA (2): 258.41
3. Artur GACHINSKI (3): 241.86 )
4. Nobunari ODA (6): 232.50
5. Daisuke TAKAHASHI (5): 232.97 – 2.52 = 230.38
6. Florent AMODIO (7): 229.68
7. Brian JOUBERT (8): 227.67
8. Michal BREZINA (4): 233.61 – 4.5 – 3.73 = 225.38
9. Richard DORNBUSH (9): 222.42
10. Ross MINER (11): 217.93
2011 Skate America
1. Michal BREZINA (1): 216.00 – 2.52 = 213.48
2. Kevin VAN DER PERREN (2): 212.48
3. Takahiko KOZUKA (3): 212.09 – 4.20 – 4.20 – 3.90 = 199.79
4. Richard DORNBUSH (4): 202.27 – 3.51 = 198.76
2011 Skate Canada
1. Patrick CHAN (1): 253.74 -7.59 = 246.15
2. Javier FERNANDEZ (2): 250.33 – 5.50 = 244.83
3. Daisuke TAKAHASHI (3): 237.87
4. Adam RIPPON (4): 217.97 – 3.90 = 214
2011 Cup of China
1. Nan SONG (3): 226.75
2. Nobunari ODA (2): 227.11 – 1.60 = 225.51
3. Jeremy ABBOTT (1): 228.49 – 7.30 = 221.19
4. Artur GACHINSKI (5): 222.54 – 7.30 = 215.24
2011 NHK
1. Daisuke TAKAHASHI (1): 259.75 – 5.60 = 254.15
2. Takahiko KOZUKA (2): 235.02 – 5.06 = 230.02
3. Ross MINER (3): 212.36
4. Samuel CONTESTI (4): 209.69 – 0.90 = 208.79
2011 TEB
1. Patrick CHAN (1): 240.60 – 4.20 = 236.40
2. Nan SONG (2): 224.10
3. Michal BREZINA (3): 218.60
4. Adam RIPPON (4): 217.89
2011 Cup of Russia
1. Javier FERNANDEZ (2): 241.63
2. Yuzuru HANYU (1): 241.66 – 7.73 = 233.93
3. Jeremy ABBOTT (3): 229.08
4. Michal BREZINA (4): 226.35
2011 GPF
1. Patrick CHAN (1): 260.30 – 4.1 – 4.5 = 251.7
2. Daisuke TAKAHASHI (2): 249.12
3. Javier FERNANDEZ (3): 247.55
4. Yuzuru HANYU (4): 245.82
2012 4CC
1. Patrick CHAN (1): 273.94
2. Daisuke TAKAHASHI (2): 244.33 – 4.2 = 240.13
3. Ross MINER (3): 223.23 – 4.5 = 218.73
4. Takahito MURA (5): 217.16
5. Adam RIPPON (4): 221.55 – 4.2 – 2.1 = 215.25
So, do you like the partial-credit system better or the no-credit system better?
Last edited by skatinginbc; 02-24-2012 at 10:22 AM.
According to LifeSkates and Slam!Sports:
Patrick Chan: "I am not gay." Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Bookmarks