
Originally Posted by
kwanatic
Here's her lutz and salchow attempts while with TAT (not including non ISU events, ie. Japan Open or Japanese Nationals):
2008-2009
TEB: SP (doubled lutz with "!" call, all -3 GOEs), LP (no lutz, fall on sal)
NHK: SP (clean lutz), LP (no lutz, clean sal )
Final: SP (clean lutz), LP (clean sal, no lutz)
4CC: SP (doubled lutz, all -3 GOEs), LP (no lutz, no sal)
Worlds: (doubled lutz with "!" call, all but one -3 GOEs), LP (no lutz, no sal)
WTT: SP (no lutz), LP (no lutz, no sal)
2009-2010
TEB: SP (no lutz), LP (no lutz, no sal)
COR: SP (no lutz), LP (no lutz, no sal)
4CC: SP (no lutz), LP (no lutz, no sal)
Olys: SP (no lutz), LP (no lutz, no sal)
Worlds: SP (no lutz), LP (no lutz, no sal)
So under TAT, Mao managed 2 clean lutzes and 2 clean salchows in two whole seasons. IMO those stats can't be seen as remotely consistent or valid enough to give more credit to TAT for fixing any of Mao's jumps. If anything abandoning both the lutz and the salchow for an entire season is probably why Mao never got them consistent. Her lutz was on its way to getting better before they dropped it; and b/c her salchow was too iffy, they switched it to a 3t and never put it back in and it's now twice as hard for her to get it back.
I think TAT has her merits but I really didn't like her coaching Mao at all.
Bookmarks