
Originally Posted by
jcoates
Charlie was the most successful of the four in singles, competing in several JGPs and Junior Nationals. I think that he could have been a success in pairs as well with the right sized partner.
As to Charlie's facial expressions, they have improved significantly ever since the success of the Bollywood program. He has greater range than he used to and establishes far more eye contact with both Meryl and the judges and audience than he is give credit for. He actually varies between bubbly and cheerful and confidently showy in sections of D/F. The old critique about his expression and eye contact has become a bit of a reliable fall back and somewhat cliched when distinguishing between the two teams. The same easy, predictability can be found in the critiques of V/M which almost always default to praising their connection, lines, musicality, etc. Even when they are off, the same canned lines of praise find their way into various posts. I feel it would be better to attempt to take a look at each team with fresh eyes each time they take the ice rather than relying on years of established perceptions. For example, I had no issue with V/M winning 4CC. they were clearly better in the end. I am not convinced of their clear superiority in Nice. Still it seems that there was a shift in perception that carried over between competitions and which established a new judging paradigm.
Taking another team into account, I felt the W/P could make a very strong case for performance of the night in the FD. I certainly thought they were noticeably better than P/B and were finally knocking on the door of the top two. There was a sureness to everything they did that has been slowly developing over the last two years. It was nice to see it come together as it reminded me somewhat of the breakthroughs V/M (2008) and D/W (2009) each had that forced the establishment to take notice of them.
Bookmarks