"the two teams were scored equally in the Performance mark
, 9.68. Virtue & Moir earned slightly higher marks for the four remaining categories. This, of course, is where subjectivity creeps in fairly easily. What makes the different between a 9.50 and a 9.75 in two stellar performances? It is not something that is easily defined, and since the judges' identities are secret,
(and Judge #1 listed for Virtue & Moir is not necessarily Judge #1 on Davis & White's protocol sheet) we cannot see how they directly compared the two teams."