Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 45

Thread: Ice Dance: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

  1. #1
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,609

    Ice Dance: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

    The dance story took a very dramatic turn during Worlds, with stories both big and small getting new twists to make the ending interesting. Be prepared for some diffuse rambling....

    The Fluke Bronze Medalist
    One idea that I had after last season was that fluke first time medalists tend not to repeat themselves. While a semantics debate erupted around the use of the word fluke (and the judgement contained therein), ultimately I meant that in a situation where the results were close enough that a slightly different judging panel could come to a different conclusion, the beneficiaries of said decision would be unlikely to repeat. Chait/Sahknovski and Khoklova/Novitski were the two that came to mind. I used this to question what we’d see with the Shibutanis and much like the earlier two skaters, they suffered a little this season. Now, it’s not clear to what extent they suffered as a consequence– they were hindered by the perception of more-of-the-same with the FD, an SD that didn’t cater to their strengths (I liked it, though), but their PCS weren’t harmed profoundly (they had lower PCS this year at Worlds, but it was a lesser skate). I do think that the Shibs will likely bounce back from this (unlike the two earlier teams), but think it’s worthy of a note.

    Random sidebar: In the modern history (read: since the introduction of ice dance to the Olympics) the one-time medalist is actually increasing in frequency. Of the eight teams, only two occurred in 24 years (1976-1999) – one of those teams was Krylova/Federov, and she obviously had success after that. From 2000-2010, it’s happened six times (Drobiazko/Vanagas, C/S, Winkler/Lhose, Grushina/Goncharov, Khoklova/Novitski, Faella/Scali – P/B and the Shibs could win more, of course). Just a sign of the times regarding the fluidity of the standings.

    Bobrova/Soloviev vs Ilynikh/Katsalpov
    One team won a GP gold medal, earned a trip to the GPF, won their second consecutive National title and followed that up with their second consecutive Euro silver. The other merely beat their compatriots at the biggest event in the world by more than 10 points, to go along with their first Euros medal and their GP bronze (along with the highest worlds ranking since Domnina/Shabalin). Who do you choose? I/K? They’re younger, with the more connected coach and have demonstrated more improvement this year. But they’re also tempestuous and very new (three years old). Kustorova is nothing if not feisty. She will fight. And even when they had two flawed skates, Bobrova/Soloviev actually outPCSed I/K (cumulatively) suggesting that the judges still aren’t quite sure they want to buy what I/K are selling. The problem (aka, the awesome thing for us) with the ice dance standings being so fluid is that without a clear separation in talent, it’s actually rather hard for one team to gain momentum, and given that both have one similar points-losing flaw (the levels), I wouldn’t wager.

    Don’t even think about it, Skate Canada
    You know what I’m talking about.

    The Sun setting on the Canton quartet
    Okay, I’ve been trying to wrap my head around the results, negotiating both the on-ice dancing, the shift in the off-ice judging paradigm, and potential narratives that result. It’s a little weird in my head right now, so I’ll try to be cogent.

    None of the Canton trio scored a level four on the Rhumba
    Canton knows levels. B/A’s success was in part of their ability to score levels (they actually had a higher base value than Navka/Kostamorov at Worlds 05 and the Olympics). Davis/White were the first team to score an all level four free dance (NHK 2006). Virtue/Moir were the first team to score straight level fours on both dances (Worlds 2007). Canton had the extraordinary luck of having not one but two long-lasting teams that also were quite young, a recipe for COP magic. But the world has caught up. The top three Krylova/Camerlengo teams had level fours (two had for both segments, W/P only one). Ilynikh/Katsalpov were able to. That these six weren’t able to, despite their technical ability, is something worth remarking on. What did they do wrong (both Charlie and Scott have mentioned that they dislike the Rhumba, though that was five years ago for the former, curiously)?

    Davis/White: PCS???
    SD
    SA: 36.19
    CoR: 36.65
    GPF: 37.67
    4CC: 37.44
    Worlds: 37.48

    No real trend. You’d expect PCS to increase as skaters get more comfortable with the program – a jump from the GP season to the ISU championship season is expected. Given how closely the last three cluster, it’s fair to say that’s pretty much on one level together. Now, I don’t recall all their SDs, except my recollection matches the aforementioned – they skated it the best they had at the GPF.

    FD
    SA: 56.53
    CoR: 58.27
    GPF: 57.95
    4CC: 57.24
    Worlds: 56.71

    Now, I’m not sure what the margin of error is, but you see a very early peak, followed by a steady decline. I’m not sure what conclusions to draw, but I wanted the numbers posted because....

    How would you politick against Canton?
    Honestly, think about it.

    The Shibs? Easy. Emphasize how junior they skate (they don’t, but they’re young, so the criticism will stick). Play up their presumed lack of range (truer). Root for a style of SD that hurts them (Latin? Ouch. Yankee Polka? Finnstep? Every single European federation dropped the ball on that one)

    D/W? Less easy, but still doable. Talk about their athleticism, but do so in the passive-aggressive terms (it’s more like pairs skating! They’re so fast you can hardly take in the choreography). When they talk about how they would rather not fake a relationship off the ice in order to get publicity, snark that they can barely fake one ON the ice. Talk about their lack of performance. Ignore the improvements Meryl’s made to posture, Charlie’s made to emoting, etc. It’s harder because.... well, they HAVE improved a great deal (I recommend comparing their final rotational lift in Samson and Delilah to their rotational lift in DF), but it’s certainly plausible (and everything’s relative. They have improved their performing, but they aren’t comparable to any number of teams there).

    V/M? Probably be the hardest, as they have the mantle of Olympic Champion. Tarnish them too much and you tarnish the trophy (and you want that trophy). But it’s possible, definitely very possible. Mention their lack of range (sure, they actually haven’t skated to a strictly romantic piece since Mahler, but whatever). Discuss how good they were when they came on, and how injuries have limited their actual improvement to the point where it’s like they haven’t improved since they came on the senior stage(again, anyone who doesn’t see improvement between the Worlds performance of Valse Triste/Assassination Tango and the Worlds performance of Dark Eyes/Umbrellas of Cherbourg doesn’t
    want to see the improvement. But in politicking, a willfully blind eye is necessary).

    Remember that politicking is most effective when there’s some truth in it – and I’ve heard all these ideas postulated on forums (here and FSU, mainly); when the judges are capable of doing something about it. Now, there is bad politicking. It was bad of Mishin et al to politick against Lysacek on the basis of the quad, as the judges couldn’t deduct base value points from his flip or lutz to make up for that. The quad has a base value. You don’t do one, you don’t get the base value. It was smart of Carroll et al to play up the simplicity of Plushenko’s choreography and lack of transitions. The judges can say – hey, those aren’t transitions, and he loses points!

    So it’s certainly not impossible to politick against Canton, but....

    Who benefits?
    I mean, more specifically than everyone. Backstage Barbie posted a series of questions at the beginning of the season, and on the situation in dance, my post was as follows....

    10) How critical is the 2011-2012 in the grand scheme of things, specifically looking toward Sochi?
    ...

    Dance: Super critical. If one of the newer teams don’t make a huge leap forward to close the gap between them and the Canton quartet, it’ll be like being down by four runs at the bottom of the ninth. Simply speaking, they need to make their move and do it now. But not just that. If they’re the third team in their country, they need to make an argument they should be second (Riazanova/Tkachenko, Paul/Islam), otherwise by Sochi they’ll be like Weaver/Poje in 2010. If they’re second, they NEED to make that move on first. And if they’re first, they damn well better cement that. If they don’t..... well, see Belbin/Agosto. It’ll also give us a hint just how hungry V/M are to continue competing. I’ve read people doubting their presence in Sochi, whereas I sorta feel the opposite.
    I’ve said elsewhere that the goal for everyone but the Canton quartet would be to get within ten points of Canton. The ground moved so little between Worlds 2010 and 2011 that it was striking. Well, this year one team did it: Pechalat/Bourzat. They were 9.47 points behind V/M. On paper, they would be the ones most likely to snare the group. But how realistic are their scores? There was a lot of inflation going on for the hometown skaters, and they were the most egregious beneficiaries. But more than that – it’s not like the European nations work in a vacuum. Russia wants a spot on the Sochi podium as well, and it’ll be a lot easier to tackle the team that has peaked than the dominant quartet of this time. And, frankly, P/B aren’t THAT good that they’ll be held up as exemplars over the next two seasons. Expect a minor, K/N-like drop next season (at worlds. At Euros, they should still be fine).

    But the other teams: W/P, B/S, I/K, C/L.... none were in the ten points or less range. That is not good. V/M were 11.5 points within bronze in 2007. D/W were twelve points within bronze by 2008. I mention bronze and not gold/silver because the gold/silver teams retired (and the injuries that blocked the D/S’s are well known) and that’s partly what allowed the rise of the Canton quartet. When you’re still ceding 16-20+ points to these guys, you’ve got a lot of ground to make up. Now, I feel the Sochi podium will be made of three of the seven aforementioned teams, but there’s some talk about the scoring being the wake-up call to both the top two that they’re gonna be roped in.

    Breaking Records vs Overscoring
    The ISU believes, rightly or wrongly, that the sport benefits from those who can break records. Chan wants to start the 300 club (Nationals doesn’t count, obviously). During the Olympic season, we saw the first tens handed out. The rules have been redefined to use the upper GOE limits more freely. During the Olympic season, we saw records in the OD, ladies (sp/lp/both) and pairs (sp/lp/both). One of the proposals on the table at the next ISU conference would be to give a base value to the transition lift, which would have the effect of raising the possible score in the FD even further.

    But on the other hand... there is a clearly defined ceiling. This year, the ceiling was 81 points for the SD, 118 points for the FD. It was literally impossible to score higher than that. The number will change. The Golden Waltz and the Rhumba had different point values at corresponding levels, for example. The number of elements will change. But the fact remains – these guys are pushing the limits of scoring. Meanwhile.... people are complaining about it. It started at the GPF, but I’d speculate that the rumblings actually started after CoR, with D/W scoring the highest PCS ever for a FD (at least we saw that debate explode here) and scoring two 10s from one judge for SD despite Charlie having a significant flaw and the consequent “offness” of the skate. But we know that Zhulin complained loudly about the way the judges were handing out tens after the GPF. We know Kustorova complained that “yesterday’s” skaters were being overscored based on reputation. At Euros and 4CC, the tech panels came down hard (likely in response to the level fours like candy at the GPF). At Worlds, none of the Canton quartet scored season’s bests in overall or the FD. V/M did score a SB in the short, but that’s been a disappointing dance all year for them. I/K, C/L, W/P and P/B did score season’s bests in both portions (and overall) at Worlds.

    So the Canton trio have, almost, become victims of their own success. I doubt that the complaints would have been so vociferous if V/M weren’t 70+ skaters with a fall (SD), nor if D/W weren’t scoring 76+ for a Latin dance that didn’t conform to a popular conception of that dance (or 10s for a passionless tango). The higher you get, the harder it gets to score better (it’s gonna have to be a massively special skate to get all +3s or all 10s). Their competitors can still, theoretically, score higher. If D/W and V/M are still looking at the 180 territory and the rest are gazing at 170 longingly, I doubt all the politicking i the world with remove them from the top two steps, regardless.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    160
    Davis and white can start getting beat if they don`t evolve and get creative their rah rah in you face speed style is starting to get old with the judges, and Charlie please drop the butterfly leap already.

  3. #3
    Custom Title Mathman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    28,330
    Quote Originally Posted by ImaginaryPogue
    Don’t even think about it, Skate Canada.

    You know what I’m talking about.
    Actually, I don't. Can you give me a hint?

  4. #4
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Nontario
    Posts
    246
    I know and I agree wholeheartedly.

    As for the Canton skaters, I feel that Marina Zoueva had an off year in choreography, not only for the top three. DF looked like a masterpiece to me, except for the butterfly leap, but Davis and White never quite pulled it off. Everything else this year was pretty pedestrian, including her work for the Shibutanis and Chock and Bates. Perhaps it would be unwise to extrapolate from this, she may get her groove back next year.

  5. #5
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,198
    Quote Originally Posted by Mathman View Post
    Actually, I don't. Can you give me a hint?
    I think ImaginaryPogue was either referring to:

    a) the situation with Skate Canada vis-a-vis Gilles/Poirier, or

    b) the speculation that Skate Canada may exchange their gold medal politicks in ice dance at Sochi in favour of a gold medal in another discipline.

  6. #6
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,609
    Quote Originally Posted by Mathman View Post
    Actually, I don't. Can you give me a hint?
    Quote Originally Posted by evangeline View Post
    I think ImaginaryPogue was either referring to:

    a) the situation with Skate Canada vis-a-vis Gilles/Poirier, or

    b) the speculation that Skate Canada may exchange their gold medal politicks in ice dance at Sochi in favour of a gold medal in another discipline.
    The former. I don't want either, but man, the scoring at Canadian nationals terrified me re: the former.

  7. #7
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Nontario
    Posts
    246
    The scoring at Nationals was a horror movie, especially with the two competition times.

    I wanted to shout, "Kids, if you're not Gilles and Poirier, grab your skates and get yourselves to an international coach !"

  8. #8
    Constable , Costume Police colleen o'neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,797
    Pogue, you may be bringing me back to life here... I've been in a kind of numb space ,and having a hard time wrapping my brain around anything , but you raise some very interesting points... and I think I feel the engines starting to warm up. Ennui , begone!

    Dont even think about it , Skate Canada ...I'm with you 100% and if there were such things , that would be 200% or 300%. Credit where credit is due only , please. And do not ,ever again, split up the competition. It's so unfair. OK, let the TV only show the last group with, maybe , the odd standout in prime time , if they must..but don't let them monkey with the competition.( I don't think they continued with that arrangement in the US this year, did they ?)

    The Fluke Bronze Medalist..This one has me very interested. With the log jam beneath V/M and D/W anything could happen.. I'm thinking W/P have not peaked and could do well with a polka..I can see no reason why their momentum should not continue ( fingers crossed ). The Shibs should find the polka a better fit , but they need an injection of something else .. just a touch. I don't know if I can explain what I mean..It's something that may just naturally come with maturity... but right now , they're just a bit too perfect.. it's sort of like they're giving a " how to " demonstration , and not a performance. I love them.. and feel they're fully capable of meeting any technical requirements in the future ,but I think this area needs special attention.

    B/S vs. I/K..this is very tough for me.. I always liked B/S, but , Boy,oh boy ! do they need choreography ( and a posture fix and better costumes ). And I/K ?..I just don't feel "couple" from them , at all. Even though they've improved , it's all her , and lovely as she is..it takes two. I didn't like their programs and I think they were probably over marked ... then , with C/L probably being a bit undermarked..voila ! It doesn't sit well with me...Anyway , that's just an aside.. I do feel that there will be an attempt to fulfill the I/K prophecy , and I agree Kustarova will fight. Not-so-secretly, I wish R/T could get some choreography and make some real progress in the next year ( speed, neatness, etc ). If they could, I feel they could be the surprise standout from Russia.

    Grocery shopping calls, I'll have to come back to Canton.
    Last edited by colleen o'neill; 04-07-2012 at 03:34 PM.

  9. #9
    Tripping on the Podium
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    In the windy prairies
    Posts
    60
    Gilles and Poirier are going to have to work for it. Weaver and Poje are light years in front of them right now, it'll be a couple of years before they can catch them. And in the choreo dept I'd give Camerlengo the edge over Dean who isn't as familiar with the cops scoring as is the former. I've been wrong many times before but I'd call it advantage team W/P.

    I'd give the advantage to Bobrova and Soloviev. They have no baggage and neither Russian teams had programs that made you go wow, holy smokes that was awesome, but we'll see what happens next season. The first time I saw I/K was at jr worlds where they had a wonderful golden waltz. I don't see any technical progression, to me they have looked sloppier. Nothing I can put my finger on but they look less crisp.

    D/W and V/M. What do they need? Well they've done a lot of different programs/themes through the years. I think a change in choreo for both of them might be a good idea. Heaven forbid they leave Canton . They can still take their coaching there, but new eyes would be an improvement - breath some different life into their skating.

  10. #10
    Wicked Yankee Girl dorispulaski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Staring at the ocean and smiling.
    Posts
    15,964
    I&K did not skate the Golden Waltz in Juniors; the Golden is always skated at the Senior Level; they did skate to a Schnittke waltz in last year's SD, which included the Golden.

    The CD in their one trip to Jr Worlds was the Westminster Waltz. (2009-2010) Is that the performance you are referring to, or the SD last year?

  11. #11
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    The Brink of Insanity
    Posts
    667
    Quote Originally Posted by PatC View Post
    I'd give the advantage to Bobrova and Soloviev. They have no baggage and neither Russian teams had programs that made you go wow, holy smokes that was awesome, but we'll see what happens next season. The first time I saw I/K was at jr worlds where they had a wonderful golden waltz. I don't see any technical progression, to me they have looked sloppier. Nothing I can put my finger on but they look less crisp.
    I thought B&S would be the next great Russian dance team, but the problem lies in their packaging. Their FD's have all looked stale and dated, relying more on drama and less on technique. Worse yet, Russian fans have posted that their coaching/choreographic team seems to think that they're doing nothing wrong and their team is being held down by politiks, so they're not prepared to make any changes. Without better material, I don't see them moving up.

  12. #12
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,609
    Worse still is that you can see Kustorova's junior teams developing the same faults B/S have. It's a shame because they have some nice qualities.

    I have to admit, my heart lies with Riazanova/Tkachenko, though everyone who's seen them live always mentions their lack of speed.

  13. #13
    Tripping on the Podium
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    In the windy prairies
    Posts
    60
    Quote Originally Posted by dorispulaski View Post
    I&K did not skate the Golden Waltz in Juniors; the Golden is always skated at the Senior Level; they did skate to a Schnittke waltz in last year's SD, which included the Golden.

    The CD in their one trip to Jr Worlds was the Westminster Waltz. (2009-2010) Is that the performance you are referring to, or the SD last year?
    My mistake, I should have remembered it was the westminster waltz. Last year's sd was not as memorable.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonlady View Post
    I thought B&S would be the next great Russian dance team, but the problem lies in their packaging. Their FD's have all looked stale and dated, relying more on drama and less on technique. Worse yet, Russian fans have posted that their coaching/choreographic team seems to think that they're doing nothing wrong and their team is being held down by politiks, so they're not prepared to make any changes. Without better material, I don't see them moving up.
    I re-watched their sd from worlds again because I couldn't remember it. Neither one of these teams is going to challenge for the podium with the material they've been using and probably will continue to use. (shrug)

  14. #14
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    The Brink of Insanity
    Posts
    667
    Quote Originally Posted by ImaginaryPogue View Post
    I have to admit, my heart lies with Riazanova/Tkachenko, though everyone who's seen them live always mentions their lack of speed.
    They were at Skate Canada this fall and I was shocked to see a Russian team with so little speed. I found them pleasant and their programs were OK, but the lack of speed was jarring. They finished behind Chock & Bates, which is pretty telling.

  15. #15
    Off the ice Buttercup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Left field
    Posts
    3,428
    Quote Originally Posted by ImaginaryPogue View Post
    The Sun setting on the Canton quartet
    Okay, I’ve been trying to wrap my head around the results, negotiating both the on-ice dancing, the shift in the off-ice judging paradigm, and potential narratives that result. It’s a little weird in my head right now, so I’ll try to be cogent.
    .
    .
    .
    So the Canton trio have, almost, become victims of their own success. I doubt that the complaints would have been so vociferous if V/M weren’t 70+ skaters with a fall (SD), nor if D/W weren’t scoring 76+ for a Latin dance that didn’t conform to a popular conception of that dance (or 10s for a passionless tango). The higher you get, the harder it gets to score better (it’s gonna have to be a massively special skate to get all +3s or all 10s). Their competitors can still, theoretically, score higher. If D/W and V/M are still looking at the 180 territory and the rest are gazing at 170 longingly, I doubt all the politicking in the world with remove them from the top two steps, regardless.
    I see two major issues with the Canton teams that you haven't mentioned, and they bear discussion:

    1. Zoueva and Shpilband don't really know what to do with teams that can't do romantic. They've come up with a few good ideas here and there, but for the most part, they seem to subscribe to the school of thought that dance is all about romance and passion - and if it can't be, well, let's default to ballroom. This results in D/W getting material that doesn't suit them stylistically, while the Shibs get the same programs over and over again. Both those teams could use a fresh point of view when it comes to choreography, the Shibs in particular. Being a sibling team can be limiting, sure, but it doesn't have to be that limiting.

    If you look at P/B, on the other hand, I think they've come as far as they have because they recognize where their strengths lie and what their limitations are, and their programs very clearly reflect that. You don't see them doing ballroom, and they certainly took a different approach to the SD this past season than most teams.

    2. So long as V/M were the stars and D/W were the challengers, with everyone else further back (or in juniors), the relationships and the politicking could be worked out easily. But once the top two teams became more equal, and D/W started beating V/M - well, suddenly it's not so clear who should come out ahead, and I suspect this affected the political maneuvering and the working relationships. D/W became dangerous, and had to be stopped; V/M became beatable, and needed to be kept that way. I think there's a lot going on behind the scenes that we're not privy to, and while I imagine that superficially at least everyone is friendly, I don't think Scott Moir would have made those post-GPF comments publicly in the past, or that D/W would have made sly digs about faking relationships.

    Something similar could happen happen with the DSC teams soon, too - but they're not at the very top yet, and I don't think it's as stressful an environment, so maybe not to the same extent.

    Somewhat OT, I don't think the French skaters were particularly overscored in Nice; I think there was overscoring going on almost across the board in some of the disciplines, and the French skaters were merely part of that trend. Contrary to what some suggest, the results have long shown that the FFSG is not that good at politicking for its skaters compared to the other big feds.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •