I think I may have seen the post, too (now that I think about it) but still, no confirmation in the form of a video or article.
Still, I guess in any case I can't blame her if she felt a bit frustrated that her teammate wasn't going to get it done even if she did. I think the vast majority of US fans shared that frustration (and saw it coming from a mile away).
I just hope Wagner and/or Gold (especially Gold!) don't get too hung up over this "3 spots" thing. Last thing you want to do is think too much and put too much pressure on yourself. They can't control how the other does, but only on what THEY do.
I don't necessarily find Gao to be the most thrilling evah. But she has consistently landed a heck of a lot of triples every time. And in terms of Gracie, Gracie doesn't have exactly a ton of international experience herself. Gao HAS out performed her internationally this year.
Now I DO think Gracie has better jumps more likely to do the 3/3s. But Gracie's 3/3s aren't exactly Yu-na consistent.
Last edited by bekalc; 02-10-2013 at 11:12 PM.
And for the record I'm not censoring Gracie. I"m not sure I have so much of a problem with her on the world team. But what I have a problem with is the double standard. Where some skaters get credit for having good seasons, other skaters don't.
At the end of the day, what I think should have happened is the USFSA should have named Wagner provisionally to the team based on her good season results (but insisted on a test skate before Worlds due to how inconsistent she's been lately). And should have sent Gao, Gold, and Hicks to Four Continents. (I don't think Agnes deserved to place as high as she did at Nationals) and then looked at how well all of these girls did there. Then named the World team. Because I'm sorry Gracie has had one good free skate this season. I think she's a fantastic talent, and I'm not censoring her. But I think using Four Continents would have been a good idea...
Kim's are. Tukt's are becoming very consistent in the long...And a lot of girls have landed them more than Gracie.....And I think her 3/3s are incredible but right now they are extremely hit and miss.Lol. Whose are?
And Gao's been pretty consistently doing more triples in her free skate than Gold has.... And right now being able to consistently do about 5 triples in your program, isn't something to snuff at as uneventful. Especially when you consider Asada got credit for only rotating 4 triples here.
Last edited by bekalc; 02-10-2013 at 11:25 PM.
Gracie Gold's 3-3s 2012-2013 season (international/international comps; not including summer comps)
Successful 3F-3T attempts (no falls/UR): 2/5 (40 percent) Successful at Cup of Russia and FCC
Successful 3Z-3T attempts (no falls/UR): 4/5 (80 percent) Only failure was at 4CC.
Successful 3F-1L-3S attempts: 1/3 (33 percent) She only did this combo at the SLC Senior B early in the season.
So as you can see here, her problem has been with the 3F combos, not sure if it's because she's trying to fix her lip or what.
But her 3Z-3T is actually quite consistent. I believe this is the first competition (including summer comps) that she did not get that combo ratified.
Last edited by Mrs. P; 02-10-2013 at 11:24 PM.
Honestly I have a lot more problems with how Wagner was scored at Nationals than Gracie. I think Gracie is a huge talent and get why the USFSA wanted her out there but another part of me is just not sure she's ready for this... And I fear she'll be crucified if she's not perfect right away. I think she's a potential World Champ and don't consider her a headcase or even a disappointment.
However, I feel the USFSA has this tendency of shooting some girls up after one/two skates when the girls haven't really consistently performed well. Than they heap on all these kinds of pressure/expectations before they are ready for it...Its my real concern with Gracie....Not that I don't believe in her talent.
Last edited by bekalc; 02-10-2013 at 11:30 PM.
I know everyone is just speculating at this point in time but.......Gracie is still young! She did remarkably well at US Nats her first year as a senior. Don't y'all think her "team" is going to focus on her weaknesses, elaborate on the things she does well, and get her mentally prepared for next year? I just don't know that you can predict how someone is going to react or how they're going to be a year from now. Gracie is charismatic, relates to the crowd, has mad jumps (and I've no doubt they'll get more consistent with time - just like every other young skater's jumps....they aren't born landing triple/triples!) is graceful and flows across the ice. I honestly think she's the future of US women. She has 2 Olympics in her if she stays healthy and continues to love skating. Give her a chance instead of picking her apart.
I think the USFSA is going to nurture anyone they think can bring home a medal - especially a World or Olympic medal. If the skater performs, there will be expectations. Just like in any other sport. I doubt the powers that be are sitting back and worrying about whether they're moving her along too quickly! Hopefully she'll get good guidance from her coach(s) and family.
Last edited by noskates; 02-10-2013 at 11:47 PM.
And I'm not predicting how Gracie will be a year from now. I said that I think she's very talented and could be a future World Champion. What people are asking is if she is the best choice for Worlds. Right. Now. If she's ready for the kind of expectations she's getting. Because she's been hit or miss all season long. Now yes there's the point that it may be best for her to get experience now, but if Worlds don't go super well it may hurt her confidence too.
Nobody's saying Gracie doesn't have talent, what people are saying is basically to much too soon is she the best choice for worlds...
It seems to me the USFSA once again picks people based on one or two competitions. Rather than an people who illustrate they can perform well consistently. Wagner was not as nearly hyped as Nagasu/Zhang.. Neither Zhang or Nagasu did particularly well under the expectations they were given. And in someways probably made them far less hungry as well.
What people are saying perhaps it would be better not to hype people based on one skate or they have big jumps and such potential like Agnes (who gets held up far worse than Gold)
But rather look at the ones who perform well and reward those who perform consistently. That's where people are saying Gao has been frankly unappreciated ..
I think Gold is a huge talent by why not make her skate well in several competitions-before you annoint here and heap huge expectations on the girl too. She wasn't that bad here, but she wasn't great too.
I'm not seeing how all of this hype and holding up skaters-actually helps them. Czisny got better when she stopped being held up. So did Zhang. And the list goes on and on.
Look at the pressure poor Sotnikova was under but at least Sotnikova had performed well for several years won everything in Juniors, won several Russian National titles. Gold two years ago didn't even make the Nationals so she's not necessarily the best competitor to begin with. Why not let Gracie get use to competition, win a lot of competitions/not win. Before you hype because she had a good skate.. When she's very likely next week to have a not so good skate. There can be such a thing as setting someone up for failure.
I do see the pluses to getting Gold out there now.. But it may cost someone else an Olympic spot. I think my general problem isn't so much Gold/Wagner as the team as much as how that team got constructed. How the results at US Nationals were so highly questionable. And how the whole "judging went down"........
Last edited by bekalc; 02-11-2013 at 12:20 AM.
People screaming for Gao to replace Gracie remind me of the same kind of people who watch football and are always screaming for the backup quarterback to play when the starter is struggling. When the backup does finally play he doesn't end up doing any better then the starter and most times he does worse. There's a reason why he's the backup.
Last edited by Jammers; 02-11-2013 at 02:14 AM.
That said, I do think that there was some USFS favouritism going on, and I know I'm not alone in wondering whether the US selection system needs to be modified slightly.
R.D. is right in saying that Wagner's official statement was that she focused on herself and had no idea Czisny had skated that badly. It's probably a good thing nobody told her before she had to perform that in case she didn't land in the top 10, the US would be down to 1 spot
But basically I'm not surprised there have been no bold statements like Ashley's last year "I'm going to get those 3 spots back". Lesson learned: *both* have to do well and you have no control over the fate of your teammate.
I don't know whether she can or not. She is working with a sports psychologist. Nerves are frequently blamed for a bad outing. How would anyone know that unless the skater said that was the reason.