
Originally Posted by
Laughing Man
As for the 70% rotation rule matter, I am all for it! This sport has evolved throughout the decades. Long ago ladies only jumped doubles. Lots of men had trouble just jumping a 3lz. Then came the Russian guys who started jumping quads and hightened the level of the sport. Weren't you all excited to see Yag and Plushy compete? But the DG rates were so harsh, many men avoided quads for quite some time. Joubert, Takahashi, Oda and Kozuka kept on attempting knowing the risks, and when they failed to rotate even just a little bit, it cost them dearly. But after the 70% rule, Pattie started jumping fantastic quads which led the other guys to follow the same path, and now mens singles are becoming exciting once again. Many ladies jumping 3t-3t wouldn't have happened either if it weren't for the 70% rule I think, and I'm happy to see Gracie, Adelina, and Liza attempting much harder 3-3s. If it would encourage the skaters to try to achieve and attempt more difficult jumps, I don't see anything bad in this rule. This is a rule for all skaters, and even Verner who says he doesn't like it will be rewarded fairly by it at times. I'm not a skater so I can only imagine, but it must take alot of guts to go for a quad or a 3-3. I don't see any reason why skaters should not be rewarded at all just because of a slight UR. They still do have DG anyway, too. I find it very strange that some of you think this rule is not fair. It's a rule and that means it applies to all skaters, I see nothing unfair in that at all.
Sport is about challenge and attempting something which is hard to succeed. All the skaters practice hard to become able to do what they couldn't at first. A rule which encourages them to go on aiming for something higher cannot possibly be a bad nor unfair rule.
Bookmarks