On a scale of 1 to 6, six being the Yu-Na Olympic short program dress and 1 being a potato sack, rate this dress.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/...icle-1.1255295
On a scale of 1 to 6, six being the Yu-Na Olympic short program dress and 1 being a potato sack, rate this dress.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/...icle-1.1255295
Holy cannoli, it's transparent! There's barely anything to rate.
Nowhere near the YuNa Olympic short program dress, in other words.
Nice Star of David pendant, though.
What, you didnt mention the sweaty armpits??????
Chris the fashion challanged
Originally Posted by Olympia
To be fair to Oksana, she was probably photographed with those professional-grade cameras with super-bright flashbulbs.
I suspect that the dress was sufficiently opaque when viewed with the naked eye in person.
Oh, golly, I never thought of that. Mercifully, I'm not familiar with such cameras.
Now that you make that point, I am reminded of that early picture of Princess Diana when she was still a nursery school teacher, and they got her to stand with her back to the sun. Her perfectly modest long full skirt became just about translucent, with her silhouette showing through.
What if she'd had dress shields! Remember them?
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks