If you've read my posts, you'll see that I say positive things about Chan's skating but concede when he should be losing. Apparently on this forum if you say anything positive about Patrick Chan, people assume that you support every one of his victories.
Apparently you can use a Zamboni the ice rhetoric multiple times and still think you're clever. You're picking one example. Hanyu won NHK with two falls and 4 errors in his freeskate, and Takahashi won the GPF with errors too, including a fall. Kostner swiffered the ice with her butt in the SP and FS, but that's not indicative of how she is as a skater. And they still get 8s in P/E. Oh, but they're not Patrick Chan so you would never go after them.
You just make it seem like you have an axe to grind every time you mention Chan falls four times and can still win, as if that's been representative of his wins.
And you saying that I'm screaming for Chan just because I'm Canadian is as typifying and ignorant as if I saidsomething outrageous like you don't know a thing about skating because they don't even have ice in Australia, nor have they ever come up with any decent skaters to come out of Australia so why would your opinion hold any weight.
This post is about Chan's performance so naturally he is the subject to discuss, isn't it? If Plushenko said that he does not agree with one the results you mentioned above, then the post would be discussing about that case, plus discussing about Plushenko is artistic or not (which is just common trend when coming to Plushenko). But of course Patrick's name would certain appear in the post (assuming we would discuss about Hanyu) as an example: "maybe Hanyu's mark is not so convincing, but how about Patrick's mark in ? (pick one of his win with multiple falls)?". All the examples or controversial results listed here only contribute to the fact that the rules need some adjustment.
Other people have been over marked does not mean then everybody should feel OK about the system and stopping complaining about Chan's marks, it only means the system needs adjustment.