Spectacular ladies triple Lutz | Golden Skate

Spectacular ladies triple Lutz

Krislite

Medalist
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
Watch these two ladies (Tonya Harding and Yuna Kim) do a triple Lutz: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMu0zQtKHAU

Some of the very best triple Lutzes done by women. I think both girls' Lutzes are spectacular, but based on comparing the height attained by their ankles relative to the boards in the background, Yuna's seems to go a little higher.

Who says the triple Lutz is a man's jump? (Mathman ;))

I think I'll continue to add to it, maybe include Ito and others and make a "Ladies Triple Lutz" compilation (just the very best). Suggestions are appreciated.
 

Krislite

Medalist
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
As a side question, I wonder what is it about the mechanics of the Lutz that can make it such a big jump? Is it just because it requires a lot of speed and height to rotate fully? Does the counter-rotation add anything?
 

Ruffles78

On the Ice
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
They are both spectacular. You definitely cannot judge the height by the relation of the ankles to the boards, because they are being filmed from different camera angles. Tonya's seems a little higher to me, but that might just be the way she vaults herself up so dramatically. I would tie them. I'd give it to Tonya based on pure athleticism, and Yuna based on overall technique. Plus, Yuna can easily tack a triple toe on the end of her lutz, something that I don't think Tonya ever did. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) I also really like how Tonya was already unhinging the free leg before she landed.
 

Ruffles78

On the Ice
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
As a side question, I wonder what is it about the mechanics of the Lutz that can make it such a big jump? Is it just because it requires a lot of speed and height to rotate fully? Does the counter-rotation add anything?

I think you're right about it requiring a lot of speed and height. I'm not sure if the counter-rotation contributes, but that could make a skater use more speed and force to jump upwards. It seems to me that skaters with big lutzs usually have big flips as well. Maybe it has to do with picking into the ice with that dominate landing leg, and the fact that you need more strength and speed to get over your right hip as you're vaulting up to snap into rotation. Some skaters do have bigger lutzes than flips, though, so maybe that outside edge and the counter rotation do contribute to it being higher.

I love watching skaters with really big lutzes in slowmo. Sebestyen's and Volchkova's were awesome as well. Tanja Szewczenko could get great height with hers as well. I don't think I've ever seen hers in slowmo.
 

FSGMT

Record Breaker
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Well, I would say that Harding has more height, but Yu-Na has better arms position, better air body position, better landing position and better landing edge...
Other great lutzes are Marchei's: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRygw_nVLuk (right at the beginning)
Miki's: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLLgEqVIqRo (at 3:02)
Caro used to have a very unstable lutz but now it is a magnificent jump: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqYLMnyl8VA
I really liked Lu Chen's lutz, too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y12W0J13oSc (at 3:41)
 

Krislite

Medalist
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
I think you're right about it requiring a lot of speed and height. I'm not sure if the counter-rotation contributes, but that could make a skater use more speed and force to jump upwards. It seems to me that skaters with big lutzs usually have big flips as well. Maybe it has to do with picking into the ice with that dominate landing leg, and the fact that you need more strength and speed to get over your right hip as you're vaulting up to snap into rotation. Some skaters do have bigger lutzes than flips, though, so maybe that outside edge and the counter rotation do contribute to it being higher.

I love watching skaters with really big lutzes in slowmo. Sebestyen's and Volchkova's were awesome as well. Tanja Szewczenko could get great height with hers as well. I don't think I've ever seen hers in slowmo.

I thought I read somewhere that the toe-picking with the landing leg adds a lot to the height. Compared to the Toe-loop, both the Flip and the Lutz use a downward forceful toe-pick into the ice.

Anyone more knowledgeable want to chime in?
 

HazyD

Rinkside
Joined
Jul 14, 2013
I love watching skaters with really big lutzes in slowmo. Sebestyen's and Volchkova's were awesome as well. Tanja Szewczenko could get great height with hers as well. I don't think I've ever seen hers in slowmo.

I'm with you. The great thing about Sebestyen's lutz was the old-school hang time (see Peggy Fleming axel); she actually looked as if she went into slo-mo in her rotations she had so much amplitude (from the vault) and so much coverage (from the momentum of her entrance speed). There's no doubt that Kim has a spectacular lutz, but it's quicker and, dare I say, doesn't travel quite as far; if one really wanted to make a speculative "jump," one might say that the jumps in general have evolved in favor of quicker revolutions at the loss of coverage, not just to potentially allow for another rotation, but to finish the jump sooner and get on to all the other things that a program needs to accumulate points.
 

drivingmissdaisy

Record Breaker
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Tatiana Malanina had a very good lutz, one of the best I've seen. I also like Baiul's and Volchkova's in addition to those already mentioned.
 

Krislite

Medalist
Joined
Sep 22, 2010
I'm with you. The great thing about Sebestyen's lutz was the old-school hang time (see Peggy Fleming axel); she actually looked as if she went into slo-mo in her rotations she had so much amplitude (from the vault) and so much coverage (from the momentum of her entrance speed). There's no doubt that Kim has a spectacular lutz, but it's quicker and, dare I say, doesn't travel quite as far; if one really wanted to make a speculative "jump," one might say that the jumps in general have evolved in favor of quicker revolutions at the loss of coverage, not just to potentially allow for another rotation, but to finish the jump sooner and get on to all the other things that a program needs to accumulate points.

Yuna's Lutz is quite delayed--her first revolution is completed at the peak, while Tonya for example is already done with two at the peak. (See slow-mo video above.)
 

HazyD

Rinkside
Joined
Jul 14, 2013
Yuna's Lutz is quite delayed--her first revolution is completed at the peak, while Tonya for example is already done with two at the peak. (See slow-mo video above.)

Yeah, after I posted this, I looked at a couple more Kim lutzes, and they do have good delays. I might still argue that what I refer to as the old-school hang time just doesn't show up much anymore, but you're right. Still love the quality of Sebestyen's lutz, though -- her grace was really in the air.
 

dorispulaski

Wicked Yankee Girl
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Country
United-States
I'm with you. The great thing about Sebestyen's lutz was the old-school hang time (see Peggy Fleming axel); she actually looked as if she went into slo-mo in her rotations she had so much amplitude (from the vault) and so much coverage (from the momentum of her entrance speed). There's no doubt that Kim has a spectacular lutz, but it's quicker and, dare I say, doesn't travel quite as far; if one really wanted to make a speculative "jump," one might say that the jumps in general have evolved in favor of quicker revolutions at the loss of coverage, not just to potentially allow for another rotation, but to finish the jump sooner and get on to all the other things that a program needs to accumulate points.

Welcome to Golden Skate, HazyD! Post long & often!
 

FlattFan

Match Penalty
Joined
Jan 4, 2010
Yuna's Lutz is quite delayed--her first revolution is completed at the peak, while Tonya for example is already done with two at the peak. (See slow-mo video above.)

It means what?
Tonya's first 2 revolution are near the peak means she has more hang time than all of them.
 

Robeye

Final Flight
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
It means what?
Tonya's first 2 revolution are near the peak means she has more hang time than all of them.
I think you're misunderstanding the argument, which is that if two rotations were completed, that means that the rotations must have begun well before the peak, and that therefore there was much less delay, if any (a skater is not a helicopter or a hummingbird).
 

Robeye

Final Flight
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Nonsense!
The physics of the argument is decidedly not "nonsense", unless you have a problem with Newton. And that was your original question ("It means what?").

If you want to dispute the observed facts, take it up with the poster.
 

drivingmissdaisy

Record Breaker
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Well, I would say that Harding has more height, but Yu-Na has better arms position, better air body position, better landing position and better landing edge.

Looking at the video, I'd say Tonya has a better landing position and edge. Yuna's free leg is still completely wrapped when she lands, whereas Tonya has already started opening up. Not to take anything away from Yuna, because she does have one of the best lutz's ever, but to me no one had better run out on the jump than Tonya because she fully rotated the jump in the air AND begun her landing position before hitting the ice.
 

FlattFan

Match Penalty
Joined
Jan 4, 2010
The physics of the argument is decidedly not "nonsense", unless you have a problem with Newton. And that was your original question ("It means what?").

If you want to dispute the observed facts, take it up with the poster.

What's so Newtonian about what you said? Hummingbird? Nonsense is nonsense.
 

Robeye

Final Flight
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
What's so Newtonian about what you said? Hummingbird? Nonsense is nonsense.
Jayzus...I'm sure there are good high school physics texts at the local library. Read them. Start with the parts dealing with parabolic trajectories and simple ballistics (bullets rotate, too, in case you didn't know, although on a slightly different axis).
 
Top