2. Lol "rule and point value changes" - you just can't get over this, can you? I'd outline the "rule and point value changes" you object to and why they are far better than the previous rules (e.g. decreasing double Axel point value, increasing triple Axel point value, decreasing triple jump GOE, allowing a triple Axel in short) but as you apparently see nothing wrong with (a) the positive GOE scaling for a double Axel being the same as a TRIPLE Axel (1, 2, 3), (b) nothing wrong with a 3A-2T being worth less than a 3Lutz-3T (a travesty, according to such "illustrious sources" as British Eurosport commentators, Alexei Mishin, Kristi Yamaguchi of all people, and Elvis Stojko, that still has not been rectified), (c) a triple Lutz with +2.2 GOE being worth as much as a +0 triple Axel, and (d) a triple Axel that's a 1/4 turn short being worth as much as a double Axel with -GOE, so I guess there's nothing that can convince you otherwise.
As for the rest of your post, why does Asada have to match Kim's accomplishments win for win and point for point in order to impress you properly? Kim obviously is better known due to her greater success and greater consistency. I don't see the need to put an asterisk next to everything Asada does that Kim hasn't done.