01-04-2014, 04:21 AM
Asada needs 3A, because Her Jump Quality is too bad.(UR, 2footed, Edge...)
She needs Difficulty desperately.
01-04-2014, 04:36 AM
the Golden Era
seems it wont matter again anyways
Kim looks to be in top form again and to be in peak for the Olympics
Mao will have to settle for silver or bronze again
01-04-2014, 09:31 AM
I haven't twisted anything. Your brought up the analogy to other sports. Either stand by your own analogy or don't. It would be nice to actually discuss the fairness of rules, but you haven't brought up any logic about the fairness of the rules besides complaining about the eville Japanese federation for the the umpteenth time and bringing Hanyu into this. But you really needn't worry. The eville Japanese federation couldn't even get Mao's clean looking 3A ratified at GPF in their own country LOL, even though the British, French, and Russian Eurosport commentators all said the 3A looked clean. Rest assured. I'm sure that at Sochi, Mao will continue to get unreasonable downgrades like that, Yuna will win easily, and you will be back here praising this judging system for how fair it is.
Originally Posted by os168
01-04-2014, 10:14 AM
I don't understand Why some people complain about Mao obtaining benefits because her "powerful" federation ,that in my view point that federation is of chocolate (a joke). If they are so powerful Why Yuna got those scores in OG and worlds? I remember in 4cc 2009 Yuna got like 72 or 73 in sp, and YUna, orser and her fans were súper happy with that score, for The ISU would be very easy left her socores like that because she get so many points in goe and pcs and are so subjectives, easly manipulables, so stop to say YUna is a poor victim because she is from a small federation, if you want to say she deserves her high scores at least you should recognize that judges never put her down, because I repeat goes and pcs Are SUBJECTIVES and if The japanese federation or isu want put her down they wouldn't give her so high score.
01-04-2014, 11:09 AM
I think a lot of folks have already made great points that if Mao wants to do three 3As, then she should just go for it - if she wants them, then she deserves to go all out in her last Olympics. I also agree that she has a lot to offer with her skating other than the famed 3A, but after all is said and done, calculating what could possibly garner a few more points may backfire anyway. I think it would be better for her to be happy that she's given everything she wants to give rather than calculating what may or may not work.
That said, I am a little sad -- or maybe not sad, surprised? -- that skating has not made much progress in 3A. After the rule change, I expected more youngsters to want to have a go at 3A, but nothing has changed too much the last four years. Especially comparing to men's. Men's now have quads pretty regularly, and the world records set in the last Olympics have been broken. Not so with ladies. Yuna was the one who came the closest again last Worlds. I thought perhaps there are more up and comers attempting 3-3 (the Russian ladies and Gold, etc) than before, but I think last Olympics the top five or six ladies all had 3-3 in their arsenal and weren't afraid to use it, so maybe that's not true either.
I hope that newcomers have talents and skills to go after 3A in the future. Regardless of whether you are Mao or Yuna fans, no one can deny that the ladies FS advanced by miles in techniques in part due to Mao's 3A and Yuna's consistent 3-3. After they retire, I would like to see other great competitions pushing the boundaries, if not necessarily from a rivalry.
01-04-2014, 11:36 AM
It is a reflect of The difficult of The jump, not even with The rule change, that is supposly so beneficial to Mao, other skaters try it. It is better we wait sit down to see another talent and brave lady skater.
Originally Posted by vegarin
01-04-2014, 11:47 AM
3axels are harder for females then males obviously not just because the men have superior speed and power but women's bodies are not built to do those kind of jumps. As for 3-3 combo's the top Ladies now are attempting them much more then back in 2010.
Originally Posted by vegarin
01-04-2014, 11:55 AM
Of course I know how hard it is for ladies to land 3A -- and I was comparing it to quads, which had a similar status in men as 3A, but definitely more men are landing quads than ladies landing 3A, so perhaps quad is easier for men than 3A is to ladies? I wouldn't know.
Originally Posted by Jammers
And yes, I know ladies have been landing 3-3 long before 2010, but if I recall correctly, Arakawa won without 3-3 in the 2006 Olympics, and other ladies couldn't land them well, which cost them gold, but by 2010, all the top ladies landed and landed well. I was talking about that difference and whether we would see that sort of difference in the next Olympics. Probably not.