I thought the video would be useful but it turned out selective and biased.
Yu na herself admitted that she made a mistake in her footwork that cost her level. Do you want me to post a link? So when she herself admits this, why can't you accept that it may very well be true.:scowl: She's also missed some levels on spins all season long.
Basically, Kim played it safe technically and was tentative artistically.
^I do agree that Kim looked zoned out whilst skating her LP. She's been over skating post-Vancouver. That being said, the "technical win" has been debunked again, and again, and again, and again.
Some posters have selective reading skills.
No it hasn't. You just don't want to hear it.
Re-posting from another thread, but this is relevant here also:
I have been trying to stay out of this because I am a huge fan of Yuna (obviously) and Adelina. But I have to say that there were multiple errors that were committed by the tech panel. First, the step squence levels for Yuna (and Carolina for that matter) were not called properly. Yuna's LP step sequence was much better than Adelina's. If that was a level 3 then Adelina's was as well. Second, triple toe at the end of Adelina's 3Lz-3T was not called under-rotated when it should have been. Third, the wrong edge on Adelina's Lutz was not called, and fourth, the double at the end of Adelina's 3 jump combination was VERY obviously downgradable and it wasn't. These combined, with impact on GOE are worth, at least, 5 points. Add to that (AT LEAST) a couple of extra points in PCS for Yuna for each program and there you go! Almost the same point difference but in opposite order.
ETA and if we're going to use the 'Andelina landed more triples' argument then consider this: Mao landed more triples than Adelina, with no obvious errors (unlike Adelina) and still ended behind her. And no, her combinations were not under-rotated and her components should have been ahead of Adelina's.
Also from another thread:
http://mydearkorea.blogspot.ca/2014/02/sochi-figure-skating-scandal.html
Flutz in full display. Tech panel should explain step sequences.
This article says it was a flip:
http://msn.foxsports.com/olympics/story/how-adelina-sotnikova-won-gold1-022014
How to know if it was originally meant to be lutz?
The article from fox said she did a triple lutz triple toe and the gif in the first thread shows the same (though it was a flutz). Not exactly sure what you meant. Maybe I'm missing something..
ESPN readership doesn't measure "international public." 92% of international public has no idea who Kim, Sotnikova or Kostner is.No scoring gymnastics can cover up the truth.
92% of the international public think Yuna was the winner, as evidenced by ESPN Poll. When there is that kind of public consensus... the notion that the judging panel scored this correctly cannot hold water.
Well, arguments have been presented, and one could say that some do not want to hear them. Here is my take from earlier in this thread:
Correctly judged, Adelina should be barely over 130 for her FS and 65 for her SP. But wait.. that's Yulia's scores.. (actually Yulia received over 200 )
Blatantly false. People are making up this statement to try and compare Adelina/Yuna to Tara/Michelle, and there IS NO COMPARISON. Yuna is not tentative. Her form is among the greatest in history. She performed perfectly and Adelina did not.
ESPN readership doesn't measure "international public." 92% of international public has no idea who Kim, Sotnikova or Kostner is.
How is it blatantly false that someone's opinion is that Yuna was tentative in Sochi? Many many people believe she lacked spark, including the NBC commentators.
and yet there other commentators said that yuna should have won..