Actually, the rule does. Do I need to cite the definition of "all" for you also?
Edit: Looking above at your response, it appears that English is not your first language and I will have to clarify further. The key words in the rule are "all" and "both." "All" does not appear in your purported counterexample.
Logically speaking, "all" is a scope modifier. It means that the "5 turn types and 3 step types" in the sentence are governed by it.
"All" indicates that the "5 turn types and 3 step types" must individually have the property of being performed in both directions (CW and CCW) in order to satisfy the rule. I can state this for you in logical notation if you wish, but I have already been far more pedantic than I wished to be on a forum where I thought a basic understanding of English was a given.
2nd Edit: It appears that I will have to break down the logical structure of the sentence for you and others like you. For the sake of the math-impaired I won't use logical notation.
The rule states:
Complexity must include at least 5 different types of turns and 3 different types of steps all
executed at least once in both directions.
"All" and "both" are the key words in the rule. We dealt with "both" already and the confusion that some seemed to have with it, wherein they mistook it for "either."
"All" is defined as:
all
[awl] adjective
1. the whole of (used in referring to quantity, extent, or duration): all the cake; all the way; all year.
2. the whole number of (used in referring to individuals or particulars, taken collectively): all students.
3. the greatest possible (used in referring to quality or degree): with all due respect; with all speed.
4. every: all kinds; all sorts.
5. any; any whatever: beyond all doubt.
[source: dictionary dot com]
In the rule, "all" is being used in the sense of 4. in the definition above. Which use, by the way, is synonymous with "each."
So schematically,
All (5 kinds of turns and 3 kinds of steps) must be performed in both (directions, CW and CCW)
in order to satisfy the rule for Level 4 StSq.
Edit: Looking above at your response, it appears that English is not your first language and I will have to clarify further. The key words in the rule are "all" and "both." "All" does not appear in your purported counterexample.
Logically speaking, "all" is a scope modifier. It means that the "5 turn types and 3 step types" in the sentence are governed by it.
"All" indicates that the "5 turn types and 3 step types" must individually have the property of being performed in both directions (CW and CCW) in order to satisfy the rule. I can state this for you in logical notation if you wish, but I have already been far more pedantic than I wished to be on a forum where I thought a basic understanding of English was a given.
2nd Edit: It appears that I will have to break down the logical structure of the sentence for you and others like you. For the sake of the math-impaired I won't use logical notation.
The rule states:
Complexity must include at least 5 different types of turns and 3 different types of steps all
executed at least once in both directions.
"All" and "both" are the key words in the rule. We dealt with "both" already and the confusion that some seemed to have with it, wherein they mistook it for "either."
"All" is defined as:
all
[awl] adjective
1. the whole of (used in referring to quantity, extent, or duration): all the cake; all the way; all year.
2. the whole number of (used in referring to individuals or particulars, taken collectively): all students.
3. the greatest possible (used in referring to quality or degree): with all due respect; with all speed.
4. every: all kinds; all sorts.
5. any; any whatever: beyond all doubt.
[source: dictionary dot com]
In the rule, "all" is being used in the sense of 4. in the definition above. Which use, by the way, is synonymous with "each."
So schematically,
All (5 kinds of turns and 3 kinds of steps) must be performed in both (directions, CW and CCW)
in order to satisfy the rule for Level 4 StSq.