I do wish there was more variability among the program component scores for some of the top skaters. For example, there is rarely more than a .5 difference (e.g., 8.12 to 8.65) across the five component categories (e.g., SS, PE, CH, IN, TR). Ashley, in my opinion, should have gotten 9 (or higher) for IN and CH, maybe 8.5 for TR, and 8 for SS, with PE more likely effected by the Performance. In this scenario, her scores are relatively close, but still a full 1.0 point difference across categories. I would argue Miyahara should have a wider range. She should get 7-7.5 for SS, but could score as high as 9.0 for CH or 8.5 for PE, but that is 1.5 to 2.0 difference across those categories. Judges rarely give big score differences across categories, especially when the Program is executed well. I think there is more room to differentiate these categories for some skaters, especially when some are very slow, don't have any height or flow in jumps, no real eye contact or musicality, but might be consistent.
I think Miyahara's SS should be at least 1 point higher than Wagner's SS. TR should be 1.5 points higher.
The rest should be up for debate.