Was hoping somebody could provide insight or confirmation of how protocols can be "read" as far as determining the views of individual judges.
For ISU events (ranging from Senior B to Worlds/Olympics) the marks of the judges are scrambled versus their listing as a judge for the event (i.e., the first column of marks do not necessarily mean they were given by the first judge "listed" and so on) BUT the marks throughout the event in a given column are from the same judge throughout. Meaning, you can look at the first column of marks and compare them for all the skaters and determine "this is how that one judge scored and ranked the skater relatively speaking" Is that right?
Is this the case in Junior level ISU events as well?
For National non-ISU events, however, the protocols actually DO reflect the judge list. In particular in the US. Is this correct? Is it true in Canada as well?
If somebody knows, that would be helpful. Thanks.
For ISU events (ranging from Senior B to Worlds/Olympics) the marks of the judges are scrambled versus their listing as a judge for the event (i.e., the first column of marks do not necessarily mean they were given by the first judge "listed" and so on) BUT the marks throughout the event in a given column are from the same judge throughout. Meaning, you can look at the first column of marks and compare them for all the skaters and determine "this is how that one judge scored and ranked the skater relatively speaking" Is that right?
Is this the case in Junior level ISU events as well?
For National non-ISU events, however, the protocols actually DO reflect the judge list. In particular in the US. Is this correct? Is it true in Canada as well?
If somebody knows, that would be helpful. Thanks.